Grizzly bears are why we need guns in schools

aCultureWarrior

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Crucible said:
"Gun free zones" are the primary targets for mass shootings, and the fact of them being 'gun free zones' has a lot to do with it.
It's not just the fact that they are easy targets, it's also a stigma in and of itself.
Click to expand...

They're putting a proverbial band aid on an out of control cancer (see my last comment as to whose responsible for that cancer).

Because society has made every place like a court building, where nobody can be armed, people are subject to any form of scrutiny, and you could be charged for looking at someone the wrong way, you have a ticking time bomb.
Click to expand...

I don't think I'd want angry people who are going to court for various reasons carrying guns inside the court building. There's plenty of police officers in those buildings to deal with any kind of violence.

There's a reason why these things rarely happened before society decided to censor others and control both them and their right to bear arms- it's too bad a lot of people can't see it.
The only thing you can do, in keeping your bias, is to progressively restrict and suffocate society with it.
Click to expand...

You Godless Libertarians are the reason our society has become a moral hellhole; too bad more people can't see it.
 
quip

quip

BANNED
Banned
aCultureWarrior said:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I'd start off with posting the 10 Commandments; they could be placed somewhere between the metal detectors and the armed security personnel at the school's entrance.



I imagine that my above post gave you secular humanists heartburn just reading it (good).
Click to expand...

TUMS® :cool:
 
ok doser

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Nick M said:
You could set a few pigs free in the hall to keep the muslims out.
Click to expand...

or just one :)

Rosie-ODonnell-Feb-7.jpg
 
Crucible

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
Nihilo said:
Is this patriarchical misogyny, or just plain old male chauvinism?
Click to expand...

Nobody cares.

Men are over being scrutinized.
Women don't like it done to them, and yet a lot them make a living off of doing just that.

They can cry all they want, it's time to grow the hell up :rolleyes:

1hy283.jpg
 
Nihilo

Nihilo

BANNED
Banned
kmoney said:
potential grizzlies. :chuckle:

:Grizzly:
Click to expand...
Pit a sufficiently motivated LeBron James against a man half his size and thrice his age---no, make it a lady instead. Pit them against each other in a death match. Is there any way that LeBron James loses this? " God made them male and female, and Samuel Colt made them equal. " Paraphrase.
 
Crucible

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
Nihilo said:
The age of consent distinguishes children from adults. :)
Click to expand...

The age of consent needs to be 16 years old. I thought it was stupid when I was 16, and I think it is stupid now. Alabama is the only state to have kept sense along that line- hearing people talk about 'not being able to consent' before they are 18 is quite frankly just retarded. Not only was one a woman or man by 16 years old just a couple centuries ago, but now a 20 year old can be labeled a sex offender for having sex with someone who is 16- I mean, it really just refutes itself :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Nihilo

Nihilo

BANNED
Banned
Crucible said:
The age of consent needs to be 16 years old. I thought it was stupid when I was 16, and I think it is stupid now. Alabama is the only state to have kept sense along that line- hearing people talk about 'not being able to consent' before they are 18 is quite frankly just retarded. Not only was one a woman or man by 16 years old just a couple centuries ago, but now a 20 year old can be labeled a sex offender for having sex with someone who is 16- I mean, it really just refutes itself :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
You understand that the difference is not the things done, but the age, that determines whether or not consent occurred.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top