Search results

Bob Hill's bottom line is that anyone who reads the Bible and concludes that the description of "saved" applies to himself is "saved?"

The unnamed designer coded for random homosexual expression?

A belief in God is immaterial to conducting lab experiments and objectively recording what one observes in a microscope or a telescope. The existance of God only matters to those analysing the data. But a belief in the existance of God might preclude some experiments and not only on moral...

90% of the time whenever there is a complaint about racism it always boils down to people who (at least half the time self designate) as "African American" or equivalent. Being a big eater, I judge things by food. When I was a kid It was a rare thing to fine decent Chinese chow. Now every town...

From another thread, "I don't know any Christian who supports the US becoming a theocracy." See www.freebooks.com Gary North, all Reconstructionists, many leaders of the OPC want the US and the world to be come a theoracy. All Post Tribs.

Creationists, please explain why humans are the only creature that soils itself when excreting waste material.

1 John is the only checklist or test or confirmation in the Bible that one is "saved." It was written so that one could know that he is saved. If you conform 100% to the precepts of 1 John then one can know that he is saved.

Examine the real St Paul (not the Pastorals) and one will find that every reference to "the Jews" is a negative statement and every reference to "Israel" is a positive statement - with one exception. The elect have always been a sub set of humanity. That goes for the Jews as well as the...

OK, no one has the time of the inclination or the guts to classify the 613 statements, but for all of you who think that gentile Christians are bound by the "Law of Moses," please someone convince me that the prohabition against lending money at interest should be classified as "administrative"...

Been listening to a John MacArthur rant against evolution. He dishonestly fails to differentiate between Darwin's wish to eliminate the concept of "god" from the study of science and the credibility of Darwin's observations about evolution. He should know better but this is an acceptable...