Liberals win: America to become Communist/Socialist

[ok doser]

A personally compassionate one... not mindlessly wrought from rote scripture retreading.

do you agree that that particular chapter directs God's Chosen People to treat foreigners differently?

 

[quip]

do you agree that that particular chapter directs God's Chosen People to treat foreigners differently?

Again...I don't follow your "goodbook"; I don't care....as such, this isn't about me.

So is this your rationalization for accepting inequities for the poor....foreign or domestic?

 

[ok doser]

Again...I don't follow your "goodbook"; I don't care....as such, this isn't about me.

so your interest is in chastising me (and Lon) for not adhering to scriptures that you have no interest in understanding or following?

OK :idunno:

 

[quip]

so your interest is in chastising me (and Lon) for not adhering to scriptures that you have no interest in understanding or following?

OK :idunno:

Yes.
Specifically, the fact you (and Lon, apparently) conveniently cherry-pick and prop your personal affectations via the Christian belief.

 

[Gary K]

A personally compassionate one... not mindlessly wrought from rote scripture retreading.

In other words, you'll make it say whatever you wish it said rather than what it actually does say.

 

[quip]

In other words, you'll make it say whatever you wish it said rather than what it actually does say.

It's straightforward. Hard to miss that target....though doser keeps succeeding at it!

 

[Gary K]

Wow, well that was a load of presumptive word salad, pretty much what I've come to expect really. Get this ffreeloader, I am cynical all ends up where it comes to politics, politicians etc from whatever "side of the aisle" so spare me your patronising ignorance. If you post a link to someone who denies that the holocaust happened then that ain't getting taken seriously and nor is the guy who comes up with such crap.

Okay?

Jolly good!

:thumb:

Just how is saying how you behave on all political subjects "patronizing"? You support every accusation made against Trump and defend absolutely corrupt Democrats and their political practices. I've never seen a single negative post from you about the Democrats or their propaganda arm, the mockingbird media. You've seen me criticize many Republicans. I'm not a one trick pony like you are. I look at both sides and criticize corruption on both sides. Too bad you can't show a similar lack of bias. You won't even criticize ABC news who has been shown to tell flat out lies in their news stories and that they suppress major political stories that can harm the Democrats. That this is what they have done is incontrovertible. It comes from ABC news themselves. And where is your criticism of that behavior? All I hear are crickets as the silence is deafening.

So, don't accuse me of being patronizing. You're the one guilty of it. It's just more projection from a socialist.

 

[Gary K]

It's straightforward. Hard to miss that target....though doser keeps succeeding at it!

LOL. You ignore the context of what you quoted and then say it means what the context denies.

In the context of the Bible, socialism is a lie. It comes from a man who hated God and Christianity, and wrote odes to the devil. His former followers admit he created a religion of immorality and demonstrate that from Marx's own words and behavior. And yet you, with a straight face try to make the Bible support a satanic political philosophy. If anyone cherry picks scripture, it is you.

 

[quip]

LOL. You ignore the context of what you quoted and then say it means what the context denies.

In the context of the Bible, socialism is a lie. It comes from a man who hated God and Christianity, and wrote odes to the devil. His former followers admit he created a religion of immorality and demonstrate that from Marx's own words and behavior. And yet you, with a straight face try to make the Bible support a satanic political philosophy. If anyone cherry picks scripture, it is you.

Giving aide to the poor; supporting social and economic equity for the same is considered a 'satanic philosophy' to you?
What an utterly sad and daresay, impoverished take on spirituality.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Just how is saying how you behave on all political subjects "patronizing"? You support every accusation made against Trump and defend absolutely corrupt Democrats and their political practices. I've never seen a single negative post from you about the Democrats or their propaganda arm, the mockingbird media. You've seen me criticize many Republicans. I'm not a one trick pony like you are. I look at both sides and criticize corruption on both sides. Too bad you can't show a similar lack of bias. You won't even criticize ABC news who has been shown to tell flat out lies in their news stories and that they suppress major political stories that can harm the Democrats. That this is what they have done is incontrovertible. It comes from ABC news themselves. And where is your criticism of that behavior? All I hear are crickets as the silence is deafening.

So, don't accuse me of being patronizing. You're the one guilty of it. It's just more projection from a socialist.

More blah blah blah...

You concocted a whole load of ignorant bunk and assumptions about me that were founded in your own imagination. I'm cynical of all parties, be it in the UK or across the pond. I make no secret of the criticism I have for Trump, he's the biggest clown of a president the US has probably ever had, a narcissist man baby. Does that mean I think the democrats are whiter than white? Nooooooo.....

I'm not a "socialist" either.

 

[ok doser]

In other words, you'll make it say whatever you wish it said rather than what it actually does say.

he's a troll

a silly troll who's not worth wasting time on

 

[ok doser]

Giving aide to the poor....

...brethren

not foreigners

 

[ok doser]

I'm cynical of all parties, be it in the UK or across the pond. ... Does that mean I think the democrats are whiter than white? Nooooooo.....

an advanced search of "arthur brain" and "clinton" shows that you're a liar

an advanced search of "arthur brain" and "obama" shows that you're a liar

 

[ok doser]

Again...I don't follow your "goodbook"; I don't care....as such, this isn't about me.

So is this your rationalization for accepting inequities for the poor....foreign or domestic?

almost missed this

Duet 15:8 But thou shalt open thine hand wide unto him, and shalt surely lend him sufficient for his need, in that which he wanteth.

"sufficient to his need"

NOT "everybody equal"

 

[annabenedetti]

an advanced search of "arthur brain" and "clinton" shows that you're a liar

an advanced search of "arthur brain" and "obama" shows that you're a liar

An advanced search of arthur brain and democrat shows that you're a troll.

The Senator from the Democrat Party told you to shut up!

I could care less what anyone from any party says.

That seems rather constrictive. What about those who are cynical of all parties in the US and don't align with your parameters and see some grey areas? It's not unpatriotic to be at odds with the administration is it? After all, plenty have voiced dissension where it comes to former presidents.

I'd surmise it was rather the more jaded and cynical element that effectively got Trump elected. There comes a time where folk get fed up of politicians in general and liberal/conservative - republican/democrat become meaningless little labels as the same ole crap goes on regardless. Understandable in its own way.

I am not blaming Obama for her breaking of the law however Obama is complicit in allowing her to escape accountability...it is called politics AB, but, it certainly does lay out an entire double standard for those that work in classified environments, meaning the rules only apply to them not the elite politician or well connected. Sorry AB, if this were a republican that had committed these crimes I would be asking for his/her head as well, either the law is the same for all or you might as well have no law at all...simple as that.

Well, if you think she's so guilty of these crimes and it's all been covered up then why do you even bother with labels like liberal/conservative or democrat/republican etc? If you think one individual is solely behind a major political manoeuver then that's naive at best no matter what party. You're too invested in a subject where you will willingly swallow claims of criminal activity against one client without absolute proof and wave the other. I'm more inclined to think they're both corrupt as anything frankly.

Oh geez, wake up and smell the napalm dude. If you think there's some substantial difference between political parties in general then you may as well have a dunce cap on your head. Way to be a naïve schmuck frankly.

And in the process of enjoying AB's posts a second time I came across a 2012 thread from when I was still a conservative defending Fox News :shocked: and there are so many people in that thread that aren't here anymore. Very sad.

 

[Arthur Brain]

An advanced search of arthur brain and democrat shows that you're a troll.

And in the process of enjoying AB's posts a second time I came across a 2012 thread from when I was still a conservative defending Fox News :shocked: and there are so many people in that thread that aren't here anymore. Very sad.

Eh, so the silly little guy's still following me about and making his usual shtick up then? Figures.

Thanks for pointing out what was obvious to anyone who isn't an obsessed troll or totally caught up in their own propaganda.

You supported Fox News?! :shocked: Well, we all have a past...

It is sad how many people have departed...

 

[annabenedetti]

Eh, so the silly little guy's still following me about and making his usual shtick up then? Figures.

Thanks for pointing out what was obvious to anyone who isn't an obsessed troll or totally caught up in their own propaganda.

You're welcome, I always did love a good search.

You supported Fox News?! :shocked: Well, we all have a past...

:chuckle:

It is sad how many people have departed...

I miss them.

 

[ok doser]

An advanced search of arthur brain and democrat ....

proves my point

thanks! :thumb:

 

[JudgeRightly]

Giving aide to the poor; supporting social and economic equity for the same is considered a 'satanic philosophy' to you?
What an utterly sad and daresay, impoverished take on spirituality.

Stealing from the rich to give to the poor is still theft.

 

[Right Divider]

Giving aide to the poor; supporting social and economic equity for the same is considered a 'satanic philosophy' to you?

Only when you forcibly take other people's money to do it.