No what I said was,
There are many fish that live outside of water, these are not fish according to your requirements.
-
This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
Why don't Darwinists say that birds are fish?
- Thread starter 7djengo7
- Start date
No what I said was,
There are many fish that live outside of water, these are not fish according to your requirements.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
False. You did say that--you did contradict yourself--by answering "Yes" to the question I asked you.
I don't dispute that you said that, also.
So when does your Winter break start, are your parents taking you anywhere this year?
Have you written your letter to Santa Clause yet?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
You're angry now, I see. But it's not my fault you contradicted yourself by saying that something that lives wholly in water lives outside the water. Why bark at me? I'm just the messenger.
So, "Child of God", have you told God yet that you don't consider Him to be good?
Yeah. Santa Claus wrote back. He told me to tell you to stop being an idiot, and that you should learn how to spell correctly.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
You know, you don't really need to keep posting replies in order to continue your conversation with yourself.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
| Nonetheless, both the popular press and many scientists continue to claim that birds are dinosaurs because they are descendents [sic] from ground dwelling theropods like dromaeosaurs. |
Note carefully that the Darwinist(s) who wrote that are, by their word, "because", telling you that for birds to be descendants of dinosaurs would be for birds to be dinosaurs. Similarly, the Darwinists who wrote the following:
And:
| birds are dinosaurs because they are descended from them |
And:
| birds are dinosaurs because they descended from the first theropod and the first dinosaur. |
What Darwinists are saying is that to be descended from B's would make A's B's. So, since Darwinists say that dinosaurs are descended from non-dinosaurs (such as fish), they are thereby saying that dinosaurs are non-dinosaurs -- in other words, Darwinists are saying that dinosaurs are not dinosaurs.
