I'm not a Darby follower but I am dispensational premillennial and I affirm that it is only Christ's one time sacrifice for sin that saves anyone at any time.
Tet has to assume that OT animal sacrifices actually atoned for sin.
They didn't.
Neither would they if they were to be offered in the future.
Correct, ko of Stek. And the passages re. the sacrifices, in the future, as depicted in Ezekiel................................are in a different order, than those described in the OT. But that does not stop deceiver Craigie Tet., from spamming this sophistry, and, excuse his spinelessness, preventing him from "calling us out," as lost, if we do, as he satanically asserts, "deny that Christ Jesus' one time sacrifice for sin was good enough." He has no purpose on TOL-NADA. He admits that he is not here to teach, advise.or evangelize anyone. So, just what is his purpose here? We know....Ssssssssssssss...............
Would the punk, assert that the "early Acts" believers, "deny that Christ Jesus' one time sacrifice for sin was good enough," as they all followed the law of Moses, including observing the feasts, "appointed times," going to the temple, which included sacrifices. Would the punk assert that Paul "denied that Christ Jesus' one time sacrifice for sin was good enough," as her kept the law, shaved his head, offered a sacrifice, and observed the feasts-every one of them?
