Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Discussion thread: One on One: AMR and JCWR on the Temporality of God

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Discussion thread: One on One: AMR and JCWR on the Temporality of God

    We can discuss the One on One here.

    http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=53669

    To be honest I really don't know much about JCWR and I don't know what prompted this debate so I have no idea how this will go or how interesting it will be.
    Last edited by Knight; December 21st, 2008, 05:48 PM.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

  • #2
    I'm looking forward to it.

    I admire AMR's theological knowledge and ability in debate and JCWR has proven himself to be nothing if not irenic, courteous and intellectually up to the challenge.

    Let the games begin!

    Comment


    • #3
      nothing

      I know this is a kinder gentler TOL.

      But come on now!! I think so far AMR has basically said nothing.

      Nothing!

      -Bob Enyart

      p.s. Come to think of it though, there's less there than there normally is to disagree with
      The Bob Enyart Live talk show airs at KGOV.com weekdays at 5 pm E.T. Also, same time, same station, check out Theology Thursday (.com) and on Fridays, Real Science Radio (.com) a.k.a. rsr.org. All shows are available 24/7 and you can call us at at 1-800-8Enyart.

      Comment


      • #4


        Cool??

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bob Enyart View Post
          I know this is a kinder gentler TOL.

          But come on now!! I think so far AMR has basically said nothing.

          Nothing!
          Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
          TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

          Comment


          • #6
            That's too funny
            The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Knight View Post
              We can discuss the One on One here.

              http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=53588

              To be honest I really don't know much about JCWR and I don't know what prompted this debate so I have no idea how this will go or how interesting it will be.
              The link goes to a Christmas thread?
              Know God and make Him known! (YWAM)

              They said: "Where is the God of Elijah?"
              I say: "Where are the Elijahs of God?" (Ravenhill "Why Revival Tarries")

              Rev. 1:17, 18; Jer. 9:23, 24

              "No Compromise!" (Keith Green)

              The Pledge: He died for me; I'll live for Him.

              Comment


              • #8
                Oooops. It's fixed now. Sorry!!!

                Here is the right link.
                Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
                TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Bob Enyart View Post
                  I know this is a kinder gentler TOL.

                  But come on now!! I think so far AMR has basically said nothing.

                  Nothing!

                  -Bob Enyart

                  p.s. Come to think of it though, there's less there than there normally is to disagree with
                  Yet with all his bad theology, he is in the Body of Christ because he believes he has failed, and that Jesus died for his sin and that the Father raised the son from the dead.

                  And others that try really hard aren't.
                  Jesus saves completely. http://www.climatedepot.com/ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

                  Titus 1

                  For there are many insubordinate, both idle talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, whose mouths must be stopped

                  Ephesians 5

                  11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    JCWR, has made his first post. Very interesting.

                    I like the way he kept it short and understandable.... call me lazy but my eyes glaze over when I see long posts.
                    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
                    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      JCWR despises me, from what I can tell. I am surprised he is opposing AMR, another one who does not like me.

                      I must say that I am cheering for JCWR, because I think he is right on track.

                      The one issue for credibility, though, is that his view is actually the A-theory of time, the one Open Theists resonate with. He is defending the A-theory, but calling it the B-theory.

                      Could someone tell him to look into that before AMR thinks he lacks credibility?

                      Keep his content, but correct his view to A vs B theory (A is dynamic/temporal; B is static/timeless).
                      Know God and make Him known! (YWAM)

                      They said: "Where is the God of Elijah?"
                      I say: "Where are the Elijahs of God?" (Ravenhill "Why Revival Tarries")

                      Rev. 1:17, 18; Jer. 9:23, 24

                      "No Compromise!" (Keith Green)

                      The Pledge: He died for me; I'll live for Him.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Bob Enyart View Post
                        I know this is a kinder gentler TOL.

                        But come on now!! I think so far AMR has basically said nothing.

                        Nothing!

                        -Bob Enyart

                        p.s. Come to think of it though, there's less there than there normally is to disagree with
                        For a moment there, Bob, I thought you actually understood the nature of entropy when applied to information theory. Oh, the irony! :squint:
                        Embedded links in my posts or in my sig below are included for a reason. Tolle Lege.



                        Do you confess?
                        Founder, Reformed Theology Institute
                        AMR's Randomata Blog
                        Learn Reformed Doctrine
                        I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
                        Christian, catholic, Calvinist, confessional, Presbyterian (PCA).
                        Lex orandi, lex credenda: everyone is a Calvinist on their knees.
                        The best TOL Social Group: here.
                        If your username appears in blue and you have over 500 posts:
                        Why?


                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Knight View Post
                          JCWR, has made his first post. Very interesting.

                          I like the way he kept it short and understandable.... call me lazy but my eyes glaze over when I see long posts.
                          Prepare yourself for some serious glazing to come, then. I am up next in the debate.
                          Embedded links in my posts or in my sig below are included for a reason. Tolle Lege.



                          Do you confess?
                          Founder, Reformed Theology Institute
                          AMR's Randomata Blog
                          Learn Reformed Doctrine
                          I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
                          Christian, catholic, Calvinist, confessional, Presbyterian (PCA).
                          Lex orandi, lex credenda: everyone is a Calvinist on their knees.
                          The best TOL Social Group: here.
                          If your username appears in blue and you have over 500 posts:
                          Why?


                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
                            Prepare yourself for some serious glazing to come, then. I am up next in the debate.
                            Oh trust me I know... but it's all good because I haven't been sleeping so well lately.
                            Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
                            TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by godrulz View Post
                              The one issue for credibility, though, is that his view is actually the A-theory of time, the one Open Theists resonate with. He is defending the A-theory, but calling it the B-theory.

                              Could someone tell him to look into that before AMR thinks he lacks credibility?

                              Keep his content, but correct his view to A vs B theory (A is dynamic/temporal; B is static/timeless).
                              This from one who is a bastion of credibility?

                              Anyway, the debate will proceed despite JCWR's apparent confusion on the topic. I will try and clear things up for you both.
                              Embedded links in my posts or in my sig below are included for a reason. Tolle Lege.



                              Do you confess?
                              Founder, Reformed Theology Institute
                              AMR's Randomata Blog
                              Learn Reformed Doctrine
                              I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
                              Christian, catholic, Calvinist, confessional, Presbyterian (PCA).
                              Lex orandi, lex credenda: everyone is a Calvinist on their knees.
                              The best TOL Social Group: here.
                              If your username appears in blue and you have over 500 posts:
                              Why?


                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X