ECT Hebrews- Problem verses for Interplanner

[SaulToPaul 2]

There are MANY verses that challenge IP's views. But, let's start things with this one:


Hebrews 2
8 Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.


What saith IP?

 

[steko]

There are MANY verses that challenge IP's views. But, let's start things with this one:


Hebrews 2
8 Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.


What saith IP?

'Not yet'? Is that what it says?

I'll have to look at that again!

Yeah man, what it is!

 

[steko]

Well, just to be sure.

Yep, is what it is.

Not yet!

 

[steko]

nun de oupō horōmen


Greek- oupo- not yet

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

nun de oupō horōmen


Greek- oupo- not yet

I wonder what IP's commentaries say...

 

[steko]

I wonder what IP's commentaries say...

Can't wait to find out!

 

[Right Divider]

I wonder what IP's commentaries say...

Partial enthronement?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Partial enthronement?

He will probably come up with some "now, but not yet" theory from a commentary.

 

[Right Divider]

He will probably come up with some "now, but not yet" theory from a commentary.

I know that some Acts 2 dispies try that trick to avoid the obvious.

 

[Tambora]

There are MANY verses that challenge IP's views. But, let's start things with this one:


Hebrews 2
8 Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.


What saith IP?

Oh boy! Scripture games with IP!
I'll take a stab at what IP might say.

It says you don't yet SEE all things under Him.
(All things are there, you just don't SEE all things.)

 

[steko]

I know that some Acts 2 dispies try that trick to avoid the obvious.

Yep, CH Dodd(realized eschatology) > George Eldon Ladd(classical millennialism) > some Messianic Jews and... Progressive dispensationalists, for sure.

 

[Danoh]

There are MANY verses that challenge IP's views. But, let's start things with this one:


Hebrews 2
8 Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.


What saith IP?

What his answer will be?

None other than Matthew 24B.

You just watch and see,
This is...his predictability.

On this, there is no debate.

Nevertheless, Romans 5:8.

 

[Danoh]

Can't wait to find out!

O come on; you know what he'll spout.

Same old, same old he is all about.

Clearly his is an obvious self-hate.

Thank God for Romans 5:8.

 

[Danoh]

Yep, CH Dodd(realized eschatology) > George Eldon Ladd(classical millennialism) > some Messianic Jews and... Progressive dispensationalists, for sure.

Watch it, bub, the men behind the KJV were Reformed Amillennial - they too might well have taken great issue with Dispensationalism :chuckle:

 

[DAN P]

O come on; you know what he'll spout.

Same old, same old he is all about.

Clearly his is an obvious self-hate.

Thank God for Romans 5:8.

Hi might try Eph 1:10 BUT it way above his skills !!

dan p

 

[Danoh]

Hi might try Eph 1:10 BUT it way above his skills !!

dan p

lol - such is the case with all shills.

Must be their Replacement pills.

What it distorts, and what it kills.

Nevertheless, there's THE Book,
for whom ever wills.

Come on IP, just take a look.
Quit being a Replacement crook.

Nevertheless, despite your hate,
Romans 5:8.

 

[steko]

Watch it, bub, the men behind the KJV were Reformed Amillennial - they too might well have taken great issue with Dispensationalism :chuckle:

No doubt!

 

[George Affleck]

There are MANY verses that challenge IP's views. But, let's start things with this one:


Hebrews 2
8 Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.


What saith IP?

No idea why this might be a problem!!

Can anyone fill me in?

 

[tetelestai]

Hebrews 2
8 Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.

Written prior to 70AD.

At the time Hebrews was written, Christ Jesus had not yet returned, and put all His enemies under His feet.

Keep reading Hebrews, the writer of Hebrews made it clear, that it was soon going to happen:

(Heb 10:37 KJV) For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry.

 

[tetelestai]

Funny watching all you Darby Followers take the phrase "not yet" literally, but at the same time twisting the phrase "a little while" into meaning 1,900+ years and still counting.