ECT They Will Not Receive Thy Testimony: Acts 22: 17-21

I

Interplanner

Well-known member
The things promised to the fathers are fulfilled in the resurrection. The passages own explanation is that Israel is now to be missionaries to the world, v47.

there is nothing else there, unless you have bibles with green lights about X000 years in the future.

You don't have specifics, so you lose.
 
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
The things promised to David were transferred to Christ, Is 55 quoted in Acts 13. That sets up the resurrection as the enthronement and sets up the mission too. This is unified with Acts 2:30 saying the enthronement was the resurrection and brought the Spirit to do the mission work of the kingdom, v33, cp Gal 3:2, 14.
 
SaulToPaul 2

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Interplanner said:
The things promised to the fathers are fulfilled in the resurrection. The passages own explanation is that Israel is now to be missionaries to the world, v47.

there is nothing else there, unless you have bibles with green lights about X000 years in the future.

You don't have specifics, so you lose.
Click to expand...

More made up stuff, as usual.
 
D

Danoh

New member
Interplanner said:
The things promised to David were transferred to Christ, Is 55 quoted in Acts 13. That sets up the resurrection as the enthronement and sets up the mission too. This is unified with Acts 2:30 saying the enthronement was the resurrection and brought the Spirit to do the mission work of the kingdom, v33, cp Gal 3:2, 14.
Click to expand...

Thing is, bro, you have obviously figured out so much ABSENT OF the Scripture, that you have ended up having basically figured yourself out of being able to figure things out THROUGH the Scripture.

Thus, your view makes absolute sense to you from within your particular vacuum.

Result?

There is no hope for successfully reasoning with an individual such as yourself, anymore than such an individual as yourself, has any hope of successfully reasoning with those opposed to your obvious approach, and it's results.

In this, we have long since reached a check mate - you and us Dispys...

Thus, while some are content to go back and forth with you on your every post, I no longer bother much.

Nothing against you, yourself, mind you.

Romans 5:8 took, and takes care of that part.
 
SaulToPaul 2

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Danoh said:
Thing is, bro, you have obviously figured out so much ABSENT OF the Scripture, that you have ended up having basically figured yourself out of being able to figure things out THROUGH the Scripture.

Thus, your view makes absolute sense to you from within your particular vacuum.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
So it is confused when Acts 13 has a quote of Is 55 that the promises to David were transferred to Christ? would that have any meaning if they were going to be about an 'eternal' David? That Christ--would that be the one who suffered in Ps 22 and elsewhere in the Psalms?

And then what if a few lines later 'the things promised to the fathers are fulfilled in the resurrection'? What if David was a father? What if David realized the resurrection was the enthronement of the Christ he was speaking of?
 
SaulToPaul 2

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Interplanner said:
So it is confused when Acts 13 has a quote of Is 55 that the promises to David were transferred to Christ? would that have any meaning if they were going to be about an 'eternal' David? That Christ--would that be the one who suffered in Ps 22 and elsewhere in the Psalms?

And then what if a few lines later 'the things promised to the fathers are fulfilled in the resurrection'? What if David was a father? What if David realized the resurrection was the enthronement of the Christ he was speaking of?
Click to expand...


Made up. Your act is old.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top