Was the fall necessary ?

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
It means an infinite amount of time.

It's quite the opposite of timelessness.

So you are saying that the "eternal state" has "an infinite amount of time." So you acknowledge that there is such a thing as the "eternal state."

I've already answered this question. It is the Body of Christ, as a group, that is predestined. God has no idea who or how many will join that group, (unless He has some upper limit in mind (Rom. 11:25)), but whomever does has been predestined to be glorified because He has been predestined to be glorified.

That is not what the passage says:

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love" (Eph.1:3-4).​

Paul is saying that God has chosen us in the Body of Christ before the world began. It is "individuals" who are chosen in the Body:

"For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit" (1 Cor.12:13).​

Again, it is "individuals" who are chosen to be members of the group which makes up the Body of Christ:

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love" (Eph.1:3-4).​

The believer inherits the spiritual blessings individually, as we read later in the same chapter:

"In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise" (Eph.1:13).​

Different people believe at different times so they are not sealed as a "group," and since they believe at different times they are baptized into the Body of Christ at different times and not as a "group":

"For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit" (1 Cor.12:13).​

Were you baptized into the Body of Christ at the same time, and in a group, as those who were baptized into the Body of Christ in the first century when this epistle was written? Of course not!

Your whole argument falls apart if you can't make it a group baptism into the Body of Christ.
 

Nanja

Well-known member
The Fall of man in Adam was necessary because God had already purposed Salvation Mercy through Christ from everlasting to everlasting Ps 103:17

But the mercy of the Lord is from everlasting to everlasting upon them that fear him, and his righteousness unto children's children;

Notice its From Everlasting. This is regards to the Vessels of Mercy Paul wrote of here Rom 9:23
23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
454


Amen Brother !

God had Purposed from Everlasting to display his Favour upon Particular Chosen sinners
Eph. 1:4-7, His Vessels of Mercy Rom. 9:23, for a Redemptive Purpose in Christ Jesus Eph. 3:11. And also by His Everlasting Mercy Ps. 103:17 was Purposed that everyone of them will also experience His Regenerating Mercy in New Birth.

Titus 3:5-6

5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

6 Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
So you are saying that the "eternal state" has "an infinite amount of time." So you acknowledge that there is such a thing as the "eternal state."

No, I acknowledge simply that God has always existed and that He always will exist.

That is not what the passage says:

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love" (Eph.1:3-4).​
How can you say that isn't what it says and then quote it saying exactly what you just denied it said?

"He has chosen us in Him..."

Paul is saying that God has chosen us in the Body of Christ before the world began. It is "individuals" who are chosen in the Body:

"For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit" (1 Cor.12:13).​
Once again, you claim that the verse is saying one thing and then you quote the verse that doesn't say what you just claimed it said!

How is that even possible?

Where is the singular pronoun in that passage? There isn't one! He is talking about groups, thus the plural pronouns throughout the passage.

Again, it is "individuals" who are chosen to be members of the group which makes up the Body of Christ:

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love" (Eph.1:3-4).​
Three times in a row now you have stated your doctrine and then quoted a passage that contradicts that doctrine! Are you drunk?

"...God...hath blessed us...in Christ: He hath chosen us in Him..."

The believer inherits the spiritual blessings individually, as we read later in the same chapter:

"In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise" (Eph.1:13).​

Different people believe at different times so they are not sealed as a "group," and since they believe at different times they are baptized into the Body of Christ at different times and not as a "group":

"For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit" (1 Cor.12:13).​

Were you baptized into the Body of Christ at the same time, and in a group, as those who were baptized into the Body of Christ in the first century when this epistle was written? Of course not!

Your whole argument falls apart if you can't make it a group baptism into the Body of Christ.
You're conflating two different issues.
We are saved individually into a corporate destiny. You are made a member of the Body of Christ when you get saved and it is this Body that has been predestined to Glory. Just as when you personally get on the plane, you're going to DFW along with everyone else who got on the plane. The plane's destination was set before you ever bought your singular ticket.

This really isn't that complicated and this is now already getting repetitive. Nothing anyone says will ever convince you this side of the Rapture so I think we're done.

Clete
 

genuineoriginal

New member
I'm not so sure that it would be meaningless. The fact is that we know that the fall and all it consequences happened and if we assume it was predestined then what does that say about whomever predestined it? Quite a lot, I'd say and nothing good at that!
You appear to be hinting that only an evil god would orchestrate the fall and condemn most of humanity to eternal damnation in order to gain the praise and glory from the small remnant that were predestined for salvation.

Who was He proving it to?
God is proving free-will to any of us humans that needs to know that God is not forcing their decisions.
Some people even believe that God had to prove to the angels that He gave humankind free-will.

Man either has the ability to choose or he doesn't. God already knows the answer, He doesn't need proof nor is He required to defend Himself to any of His creation.

All that is necessary (logically) is that there be an actual choice, a real alternative, a way to do or to do otherwise. There is no need for the fall itself to have ever occured at all, never mind to prove anything to anyone.

Clete
There are many people that have managed to convince themselves that they do not have any actual choices and that there are not any real alternatives.
Those are the people that need God to prove to them that their choices are not meaningless.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
"He has chosen us in Him..."

This verse is saying that God has chosen "us" in the Body of Christ. It is the "individual" believer who is baptized into the Body of Christ:

"For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit" (1 Cor.12:13).​

Where is the singular pronoun in that passage? There isn't one! He is talking about groups, thus the plural pronouns throughout the passage.

Where is a singular pronoun at 1 Corinthians 12:13? So are you saying that believers were baptized by one Spirit into the Body of Christ as a group?
 
Last edited:

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Where is a singular pronoun at 1 Corinthians 12:13? So are you saying that believers were baptized by one Spirit into the Body of Christ as a group?

:think:

You're conflating two different issues.
We are saved individually into a corporate destiny. You are made a member of the Body of Christ when you get saved and it is this Body that has been predestined to Glory. Just as when you personally get on the plane, you're going to DFW along with everyone else who got on the plane. The plane's destination was set before you ever bought your singular ticket.

This really isn't that complicated and this is now already getting repetitive. Nothing anyone says will ever convince you this side of the Rapture so I think we're done.

Clete

:idunno:
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Perhaps you will answer my questions:

Where is a singular pronoun at 1 Corinthians 12:13? So are you saying that believers were baptized by one Spirit into the Body of Christ as a group?
Clete answered your last question, Jerry. There's not a whole lot I can do if you can't read it for yourself and understand it.
 

beloved57

Well-known member
Amen Brother !

God had Purposed from Everlasting to display his Favour upon Particular Chosen sinners
Eph. 1:4-7, His Vessels of Mercy Rom. 9:23, for a Redemptive Purpose in Christ Jesus Eph. 3:11. And also by His Everlasting Mercy Ps. 103:17 was Purposed that everyone of them will also experience His Regenerating Mercy in New Birth.

Titus 3:5-6

5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

6 Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;

Amen you nailed it my Sister !
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
You appear to be hinting that only an evil god would orchestrate the fall and condemn most of humanity to eternal damnation in order to gain the praise and glory from the small remnant that were predestined for salvation.
Such a god would be analogous to the arsonist who sets your house on fire at night, comes and gets you out of bed and out of the house and then wants praised as a hero for saving your life.

God is proving free-will to any of us humans that needs to know that God is not forcing their decisions.
So we couldn't know that God is good unless we sinned first?

Is that really what you believe?

Some people even believe that God had to prove to the angels that He gave humankind free-will.
God made the angels the same week that He made Adam and Eve (Exodus 20:11). If anything it was one of them that "orchestrated" Adam's fall. His name was Lucifer.

And, once again, the implication here is, in addition to God needing to prove Himself righteous to His own creation (which is blasphemy to start with), that the angels would somehow have no way of knowing that God was good until sin happened. God's goodness is not contingent upon the existence of sin!

There are many people that have managed to convince themselves that they do not have any actual choices and that there are not any real alternatives.
Those are the people that need God to prove to them that their choices are not meaningless.
This doesn't follow.

First of all God does not answer to human beings but more directly to the point, people today who stupidly think they make no choices are products of the fall. They didn't witness Adam's fall. The same bible the tells them that Adam sinned tells them that God is good. And so how would a doctrine that claims that God orchestrated the fall of Adam 6000 years ago prove to people that God is good when the fact that they make 6000 choices a day doesn't convince them that they have the ability to choose, especially when the same bible that tells them that God is good, which they don't believe, doesn't tell them that God orchestrated the fall?


Clete
 

ttruscott

Well-known member
Originally Posted by ttruscott
then HE would have to cause our sin and that negates our free will.
If no one was choosing sin, then no proof would be necessary.
This is senseless, it does not even have a contradictory meaning but no meaning at all.


It is not God that is causing you to sin.
You see my word then? iF our sin was necessary and IF no one was sinning, THEN HE WOULD have had to cause us to sin, a blasphemy ...Don't you suggest we should read what is written?

I did not write that GOD causes our sin! Throw your verses like stones elsewhere.
 

genuineoriginal

New member
So we couldn't know that God is good unless we sinned first?

Is that really what you believe?
What does scripture state about whether the fall has anything to do with mankind knowing what good is?

Genesis 3:22-24
22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.​


God made the angels the same week that He made Adam and Eve (Exodus 20:11).
The verse is talking about the physical "heavens" (also known as the sky and outer space), not the dwelling place of God.

And, once again, the implication here is, in addition to God needing to prove Himself righteous to His own creation (which is blasphemy to start with), that the angels would somehow have no way of knowing that God was good until sin happened. God's goodness is not contingent upon the existence of sin!
Wow, so many poorly thought theological positions in such a short space.

First, God does not "need" anything, but God often does things because He "wants" it.
Does God need to prove Himself righteous to His own creation? No.
Does God want to prove Himself righteous to His own creation? Yes, of course God does.

Second, there is no blasphemy, even in the strawman argument that you created (which was a deliberate distortion of anything I may have stated).
You need to learn what blasphemy is before accusing others of committing blasphemy through your distorted misunderstandings.

Third, proof is often needed by God's creation, despite knowledge.
Peter knew that he loved Jesus more than anything, until he proved that he loved his own life more by denying Jesus three times.

Fourth, my argument is about whether the fall is necessary for proof that mankind has free-will, not about whether sin proves God is good.
Please keep to the topic instead of trying to derail it with nonsensical statements.

First of all God does not answer to human beings
I never said He did.
What made you think in that manner?

people today who stupidly think they make no choices are products of the fall.
The only thing that is a product of the fall is mankind knowing good and evil.
People are not products of the fall.

how would a doctrine that claims that God orchestrated the fall of Adam 6000 years ago prove to people that God is good
Doctrines are not proof, they are merely an attempt by mankind to take what is written in the Bible and put it in a form they can accept, often despite the fact that the doctrine is contradictory to the Bible.
Also, my argument is not about anything proving to people that God is good, merely that the fall proves that Adam had the free-will to choose to obey God or to disobey God.
 

genuineoriginal

New member
If free-will is true, then the fall was necessary to prove that God gave mankind free-will.
IF no one was choosing sin and the proof was necessary then HE would have to cause our sin and that negates our free will.
If no one was choosing sin, then no proof would be necessary.
This is senseless, it does not even have a contradictory meaning but no meaning at all.
My argument is based on a cause-effect relationship.
God gave mankind the free-will to choose whether to obey Him or disobey Him.
The fall was caused by a free-will choice made by Adam to disobey God.
Adam's disobedience proved that Adam had the ability to choose to disobey God.
If Adam had not disobeyed God, then there would be no proof that Adam was created with free-will.

A corollary argument involves whether there is a need of proof.
If everyone obeyed God, then the entire question of whether Adam was created with free-will would not even be an issue, since there would be no difference between mankind obeying God from a free-will choice and mankind obeying God because a lack of free-will that means mankind has no ability to do otherwise.
If there is no difference between mankind obeying God from a free-will choice or from a lack of free-will, then there is no need for any proof for or against the existence of free-will.
If there is no need for any proof for or against the existence of free-will, then the fall would not be necessary for anything at all.
If you find this to be senseless, it is only because of the inherent problems with the underlying assumptions of determinism.
Somehow, people who believe in determinism think that the fall happened despite mankind having no ability to make any free-will choices, which would mean that the fall was completely unnecessary and completely devoid of all meaning.

Through studying the Bible, I have come to the following conclusions:
Mankind has the free-will to choose whether to obey God or disobey Him.
Adam was created as a completely pure and untainted human who didn't even know good and evil.
The proof that mankind has free-will is found in the act of Adam disobeying God and eating of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil.
This one act of disobedience from a completely pure and untainted human is known as "the fall".
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
What does scripture state about whether the fall has anything to do with mankind knowing what good is?

Genesis 3:22-24
22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.​

I had a feeling you were going to say this. It's just so very disapointing.

The Tree was the alternative to God, ge. It was not the only avenue available toward such knowledge. Teaching good and evil was not the purpose of the Tree, it was the alternative, it was the choice, the "otherwise" in "to do or to do otherwise".

The offense at the tree grew into the Law. The Law is the knowledge of good and evil. The Law was given so that the offense might abound and both the Tree of the Knoweldge of Good and Evil and the Law had/have a ministry of death (Gen. 2:17 & Romans 7:9 (and elsewhere))

The verse is talking about the physical "heavens" (also known as the sky and outer space), not the dwelling place of God.
That's your doctrine, not the text.

Wow, so many poorly thought theological positions in such a short space.
Right back at ya!

First, God does not "need" anything, but God often does things because He "wants" it.
Does God need to prove Himself righteous to His own creation? No.
Does God want to prove Himself righteous to His own creation? Yes, of course God does.
So then explain how it accomplishes that goal?

You can't because it doesn't. All you're able to do is to make the claim but when pressed to make the actual argument, it's crickets at first and then you simply repeat the claim.

Second, there is no blasphemy, even in the strawman argument that you created (which was a deliberate distortion of anything I may have stated).
You need to learn what blasphemy is before accusing others of committing blasphemy through your distorted misunderstandings.
It is you who proposed that God orchestrated sin in order to prove Himself righteous, not me! It's blasphemy of the highest order whether you want to acknowledge it as such or not.

Third, proof is often needed by God's creation, despite knowledge.
Saying it doesn't make it so.

Again, make the argument then! How does a doctrine that teaches that God orchestrated sin, which is not anywhere stated in the bible prove the God is righteous, when the very same bible that fallen human being learn of the fall of Adam from also states emphatically that God is righteous?

If they don't believe it when the bible simply tells them that God is righteous (or that we have the ability to choose, which ever (its the same thing, by the way), how would an extra-biblical doctrine prove it to them? HOW???

And even if it were explicitly biblical that God orchestrated sin (I cringe to even write those words!) why would such a biblical account be believed and accepted as proof that God is righteous if they don't believe that God is righteous based on the testimony of the very same bible?

No matter which direction you come at this from, there is no profit whatsoever in accepting the notion that God orchestrated sin! It's just so much blasphemous nonsense!

Peter knew that he loved Jesus more than anything, until he proved that he loved his own life more by denying Jesus three times.
How is that relevant to the issue of God trying to prove Himself righteous to His own creation?

God is all the time in the business of proving to us thick headed humans that we are evil and in need of a savior. That's entirely different than God deciding in advance of creation to orchestrate evil in order to prove something. He's the only thing that existed when He supposedly cooked up this scheme so who was He trying to prove it to, Himself?

Fourth, my argument is about whether the fall is necessary for proof that mankind has free-will, not about whether sin proves God is good.
There are at least two thing wrong here...

First, as I have already said, all that is necessary is for there to be a real alternative from which to choose. If you can do or do otherwise then your will is free, by definition. It is not necessary for you to have ever done otherwise but only that doing so was a real possibility.

Second, humans are not the only beings in existence with a free will. God also has a free will. Does God also need to do evil in order to prove that He has a free will? If not, then on what basis do you make the claim that is necessary for men to do evil to prove the same thing?

Please keep to the topic instead of trying to derail it with nonsensical statements.
I will say precisely and exactly what I want to say when I want to say it. I do not say things that are intentionally off topic but I am certainly not responsible for your ignorance and/or your inability to follow my reasoning. If you have a question then ask, otherwise, I couldn't care less what you don't want me to say.

I never said He did.
What made you think in that manner?
You're premise is about God providing proof of His own righteousness, is it not? Who else other than His creation (i.e. human beings) would He be standing in the docket for?

The only thing that is a product of the fall is mankind knowing good and evil.
People are not products of the fall.
What?

Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned— 13 (For until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.​

Doctrines are not proof, they are merely an attempt by mankind to take what is written in the Bible and put it in a form they can accept, often despite the fact that the doctrine is contradictory to the Bible.
Also, my argument is not about anything proving to people that God is good, merely that the fall proves that Adam had the free-will to choose to obey God or to disobey God.
Okay fine then make the argument. I mean, actually write out the argument that concludes with the statement, "Therefore, if Adam (or anyone else) had not fallen and evil did not exist, we could not know that we have a free will."

Clete
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
You did not answer my request. How it is that you can not sin? Don't be evasive.
No one said that not sinning was possible.

The argument was that of being ABLE to turn away from sin when presented with the option to.

NO ONE said that doing so every time, turning away from sin, was doable.

People sin, saved and unsaved. Period
 

Cntrysner

Active member
No one said that not sinning was possible.

The argument was that of being ABLE to turn away from sin when presented with the option to.

NO ONE said that doing so every time, turning away from sin, was doable.

People sin, saved and unsaved. Period

What difference does it make as far as in once or anytime? Tell me how you can not sin.
 
Top