Spammers wasteland
- Thread starter Delmar
- Start date
- Status
zoo22
Well-known member
Wha??
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3
Just because it got shut down (because aCW couldn't take the heat and complained about it) doesn't mean it didn't happen.
lain:
You're on WHMBR! (excuse me) Part 4.
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3
Just because it got shut down (because aCW couldn't take the heat and complained about it) doesn't mean it didn't happen.
lain:You're on WHMBR! (excuse me) Part 4.
Brother Vinny
Active member
Wha??
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3
Just because it got shut down (because aCW couldn't take the heat and complained about it) doesn't mean it didn't happen.
You're on WHMBR! (excuse me) Part 4.
Oops.
Let's call it 3.1. Then we can round down.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Wha??
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3
Just because it got shut down (because aCW couldn't take the heat and complained about it) doesn't mean it didn't happen.
You're on WHMBR! (excuse me) Part 4.
It took me a minute to realize what was happening here.
I thought epic had come back to life. :chuckle:
Brother Vinny
Active member
Well, I'll just go have a cry now, I guess.
zoo22
Well-known member
Yeah, me too. But aCW couldn't take the heat.
In the first and original WHMBR! (excuse me) Part 3 thread, I'd posted a Christian-compiled list of "gay gateway bands," like Ted Nugent and so forth. But aCW got upset about it and complained, needing the Christian-compiled info removed and the WHMBR! (excuse me) Part 3 thread shut down. What a shame.
But Jefferson will likely post a censorship thread about it.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Well like I said on your original WHMBR! Part 3, it would have been epic...
What a shame to see the wrong thread sent to spammer's wasteland.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Er, no, I think all relevant threads should have a mandatory table of contents...
lain:bigbang123
New member
The christian biblegod is impotent
The christian biblegod is impotent
The christian biblegod wants his followers to believe that they will get their godly desires
Psalm 37:4
4 Delight thyself also in Jehovah; And he will give thee the desires of thy heart.
Matthew 21:22
22 And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.
But the christian biblegod won't get what he desires
1 Timothy 2:3-4
3 This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
4 who would have all men to be saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth.
Luke 18:8
...Nevertheless, when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?
The "so-called" reason that the christian biblegod does not get what he desires
Matthew 7:14
14 For narrow is the gate, and straitened the way, that leadeth unto life, and few are they that find it.
Matthew 22:14
14 For many are called, but few chosen.
The christian biblegod is impotent
The christian biblegod wants his followers to believe that they will get their godly desires
Psalm 37:4
4 Delight thyself also in Jehovah; And he will give thee the desires of thy heart.
Matthew 21:22
22 And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.
But the christian biblegod won't get what he desires
1 Timothy 2:3-4
3 This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
4 who would have all men to be saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth.
Luke 18:8
...Nevertheless, when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?
The "so-called" reason that the christian biblegod does not get what he desires
Matthew 7:14
14 For narrow is the gate, and straitened the way, that leadeth unto life, and few are they that find it.
Matthew 22:14
14 For many are called, but few chosen.
Spitfire
New member
It's the difference between God's antecedent and consequent will. Some synthesis is necessary. In the mean time, you're going about this exactly as fundamentalists do.
bigbang123
New member
In this forum it is ok for christians to question the soundness of the thinking of non-christians but it is not ok for non-christians (armed with little more than the bible) to question the soundness of the thinking of christians. Thanks for making that clear.
It is not OK to mock the God of the Bible at TOL. Is that clear?
I'm thinking of buying this for a daily commuter this winter :think:
or perhaps this:
Last edited:
not interested in admiring vintage snow machines? :idunno:
you must have a poor estimation of the intelligence of your audience if you believe they can't find their way to your pearls without a link :idunno:
anyhoo, we'll be getting buried with the white stuff soon up here, so for those who can commiserate, might as well travel in style
anyhoo, we'll be getting buried with the white stuff soon up here, so for those who can commiserate, might as well travel in style
- Status