With you jumping on the band-wagon.
Apparently "It's their business" is only used with one side of your face.
Spammers wasteland
- Thread starter Delmar
- Start date
- Status
Apparently "It's their business" is only used with one side of your face.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well no, As I told you before, I'm more concerned with the allegations of sexual assault against Trump. You, on the other hand, advocate for laws that Trump would never enact so your whole 'MAGA' nonsense was simply dishonest anyway so the double standard is once again, all yours.
Apparently President "David Dennison," or whatever alias he operates under, is now suing Ms Daniels' for $20 million for:
1. violating a nondisclosure agreement that he claims he didn't know about or signed
2. a payment of $130000 to buy her silence that the President says he ever made
3. from talking about a relationship that he swears never existed
Last edited:
No matter how "Tombora" spins it, Americans have 32X greater chance of being a gum homicide victim than those living in Britain!
Either British citizens are a superior breed of humanity when compared to their American counterparts, or they do not have access to those firearms that facilitate murdering one's "neighbour!"
More and more of these guys are being held accountable.
ROCKLIN, Calif. (AP) — A Northern California police officer was arrested for allegedly using his baton to assault a man suspected of driving drunk, authorities said.
Rocklin Police Officer Brad Alford was taken into custody Tuesday and booked into Placer County jail on charges of assault with a deadly weapon causing great bodily harm, assault under the color of authority and filing a false police report, said Rocklin Police Chief Chad Butler.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...ce-officer-arrested-for-using-excessive-force
OKC Police Officer Charged With Second-Degree Murder
http://www.news9.com/story/36997191/okc-police-officer-charged-with-second-degree-murder
Video evidence helped seal the fate of a white former police officer who will spend two decades in prison for a crime that law enforcement is rarely held accountable for—the killing of an unarmed black man.
A federal judge on Thursday sentenced ex-South Carolina patrolman Michael Slager to 20 years in prison for the shooting death of Walter Scott in April 2015. Outside the courthouse, Scott family attorney Chris Stewart hailed it as one of the longest sentences ever for a police shooting, calling the decision “historic.”
Officers are seldom convicted for on-duty shootings, and a judge’s ruling that Slager will serve two decades is even more unheard-of, according to a criminology expert.
“It is very rare that an officer is convicted in one of these cases and their sentence is in the range of 20 years or so—that’s rare,” Philip Stinson, an associate professor of criminal justice at Ohio’s Bowling Green State University, told Newsweek. Stinson keeps a database tracking police misconduct.
http://www.newsweek.com/walter-scott-ruling-very-rare-expert-says-741493
There are a lot of these cases; this is only a sample.
But lack of accountability is still a major problem. Many times, police get off for offenses that would get the rest of us jailed.
Why Police Officers Often Aren’t Convicted for Using Lethal Force
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...n-aren-t-convicted-using-lethal-force-n619961
And yes,as Glorydaz suggests, training regarding rights of citizens is very lacking in many police departments.
Even worse, the evidence suggests that the blue culture often pressures rookies to forget the little training they did get. A lot of police will confidentially tell investigators that they fear retribution from other officers if they report misconduct.
ROCKLIN, Calif. (AP) — A Northern California police officer was arrested for allegedly using his baton to assault a man suspected of driving drunk, authorities said.
Rocklin Police Officer Brad Alford was taken into custody Tuesday and booked into Placer County jail on charges of assault with a deadly weapon causing great bodily harm, assault under the color of authority and filing a false police report, said Rocklin Police Chief Chad Butler.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...ce-officer-arrested-for-using-excessive-force
OKC Police Officer Charged With Second-Degree Murder
http://www.news9.com/story/36997191/okc-police-officer-charged-with-second-degree-murder
Video evidence helped seal the fate of a white former police officer who will spend two decades in prison for a crime that law enforcement is rarely held accountable for—the killing of an unarmed black man.
A federal judge on Thursday sentenced ex-South Carolina patrolman Michael Slager to 20 years in prison for the shooting death of Walter Scott in April 2015. Outside the courthouse, Scott family attorney Chris Stewart hailed it as one of the longest sentences ever for a police shooting, calling the decision “historic.”
Officers are seldom convicted for on-duty shootings, and a judge’s ruling that Slager will serve two decades is even more unheard-of, according to a criminology expert.
“It is very rare that an officer is convicted in one of these cases and their sentence is in the range of 20 years or so—that’s rare,” Philip Stinson, an associate professor of criminal justice at Ohio’s Bowling Green State University, told Newsweek. Stinson keeps a database tracking police misconduct.
http://www.newsweek.com/walter-scott-ruling-very-rare-expert-says-741493
There are a lot of these cases; this is only a sample.
But lack of accountability is still a major problem. Many times, police get off for offenses that would get the rest of us jailed.
Why Police Officers Often Aren’t Convicted for Using Lethal Force
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...n-aren-t-convicted-using-lethal-force-n619961
And yes,as Glorydaz suggests, training regarding rights of citizens is very lacking in many police departments.
Even worse, the evidence suggests that the blue culture often pressures rookies to forget the little training they did get. A lot of police will confidentially tell investigators that they fear retribution from other officers if they report misconduct.
I thought it was about a police officer committing a crime against a citizen, and I mentioned that it is a problem.
What was the point of the thread?
What was the point of the thread?
musterion
Well-known member
We're wise to your playbook tricks. You know what the point it. It's about this specific story, which you will not be allowed to dilute and obfuscate. Start your own thread on general police problems.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Another bit of propaganda then. Interesting to see some of the comments on the page as well:
"The video is edited right before he is apprehended. No bullets had to be shot. No life was lost."
"They took him down in 14 sec in the real video."
Guy arrested, no life lost, no shots needing to be fired. What a terrible result.
lain:
"The video is edited right before he is apprehended. No bullets had to be shot. No life was lost."
"They took him down in 14 sec in the real video."
Guy arrested, no life lost, no shots needing to be fired. What a terrible result.
lain:
"More Americans have died from guns in the United States since 1968 than on battlefields of all the wars in American history."
— Nicholas Kristof on Thursday, August 27th, 2015 in his column in the New York Times
The 58 killed and over 500 wounded in Mas Vegas weren't victims of radical Islamic terrorist!
The 17 students and teachers gunned down in Florida didn't die because of Muslims!
280000 of the 280024 Americans who were victims of gun violence from 2005-2015 were not killed by terrorists!
Today's marches in Washington and those around the nation aren't protesting Islam!
Trump and his surrogates are so desperate to make this an issue that they have to divert our attention from the current carnage that's happening every day in America to a few isolated cases in Britain!
If they were serous about protecting American lives, instead of jousting with political windmills, they would be directing our attention to the one major contributor to preventable deaths in the nation!
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Apparently anything that doesn't fawn over the current president is considered 'unpatriotic'. Especially ironic for those who moaned about Obama so much and even more so for those who think Presidents are 'elected' by divine decree...
:freak:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
What, a serial adulterer who married a "slut", makes the most creepy innuendo up about his own daughter and generally acts like a kid who's X Box has blown up mid game? Some 'award' dude...
If only it was only yours and Tam's...
lain:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Might wanna ask Tam, it's her definitions after all. In case you hadn't noticed, I put the word slut in inverted commas. Where it comes to 'The Don' then there's plenty of adjectives for the guy, creep being right up there as with anyone else who would make such remarks about their own daughter. Ugggh...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I've asked that this thread be taken down. The reason being, accept for a few 'Good Posters' the rest are really FILTHY, disgusting human beings. No offence intended.
What, it's "filthy" to find Trump's comments about his daughter creepy as heck? Guy went on about how he'd probably be dating her if she wasn't his kid for crying out loud. You's two will give the crank a pass on anything won't you?
:freak:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
He was apprehended in 14 seconds. Oh, and please don't project onto me with your dumb neg reps you silly little crackpot. There's only one person out of the two of us who entertained anything of that sort at one point and it sure wasn't me.
lain:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
"Boy"?! :rotfl: Seriously dude, stop projecting about yourself. You've done it in a neg rep and you're doing it again here. Get a grip.
:doh:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
With regards to Daniels sure, especially given the way he's been played at each and every turn. If he had nothing to hide then why the gymnastics? It's glaringly obvious he had a fling and you have to be sorely naive to think otherwise. C'mon dude, your 'sitting president' has cheerfully gone on about being able to grab women by the genitals and would date his own daughter if he didn't happen to be her dad, so do the math.
Barbarian observes:
because this administration's policy is to let mentally ill people purchase guns,
Trump's one piece of gun-related legislation undid restrictions aimed at mental illness
But there is one important thing Trump has done on the issue of gun control during his time in office.
A little less than a year ago, on February 28, 2017, he signed a measure nixing a regulation aimed at keeping guns out of the hands of some severely mentally ill people.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/15/politics/trump-gun-legislation-mental-health/index.html
Always check before you respond. It can save you a lot of embarrassment.
because this administration's policy is to let mentally ill people purchase guns,
Trump's one piece of gun-related legislation undid restrictions aimed at mental illness
But there is one important thing Trump has done on the issue of gun control during his time in office.
A little less than a year ago, on February 28, 2017, he signed a measure nixing a regulation aimed at keeping guns out of the hands of some severely mentally ill people.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/15/politics/trump-gun-legislation-mental-health/index.html
Always check before you respond. It can save you a lot of embarrassment.
Unfortunately, Trump made no distinction, removing the restriction for all mentally ill people. It was a huge mistake, and it will continue to have consequences.
I understand you're trying to find a way to spin this so it's something other than it is. But there is no way to shill it around that way.
It was a huge error.
Hardly. He just did what he was told by the NRA. They didn't want mentally ill people stopped from buying firearms.
Calm yourself. He messed up. And later, he shifted his postion to another indefensible idea:
President Donald Trump, during a bipartisan meeting Wednesday with lawmakers to discuss school safety and gun measures, said it might be better in some cases to allow law enforcement to confiscate weapons from potentially disturbed individuals before allowing due process.
"Take the gun first, go through due process second," Trump said.
After listening to his Vice President Mike Pence discuss due process and the conversation that the President had with governors earlier this week, Trump suggested: "Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court."
Trump pointed to the shooter in the Parkland case, citing the red flags and calls from neighbors -- all warning signs that law enforcement failed to follow up on.
"A lot of times by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court to get the due process procedures, I like taking the guns early," the President said.
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska, who was not at the bipartisan meeting, slammed Trump's statement.
"We're not ditching any constitutional protections simply because the last person the President talked to today doesn't like them," he said.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/politics/due-process-donald-trump-second-amendment/index.html
I know his theory of management is to have as much chaos as possible. But in a representative democracy, where the laws are made by legislators, it doesn't work so well.
The solution isn't to just ignore the 2nd Amendment; once you go down that road, no freedom is safe. Rather, it's to find constitutional ways to keep guns out of the hands of people who are likely to misuse them.
- Status