Tweet
Originally posted by glorydaz
View Post
-
Neither is this, so what's your point? -
I have to question the veracity of that article, but will certainly check into it further.Originally posted by JudgeRightly View PostComment
-
Also this... http://americanrtl.org/life-of-the-mother-exceptionOriginally posted by glorydaz View PostComment
-
Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
My "point" is that it looks like the rules may be changing again, and I want to be up to speed.
Do you blame me for wanting to know what is allowable and what isn't?
Am I not allowed to make observations about possible rule violations?
Am I forbidden to warn others of possible rule violations?
I speak of Truster's warning.
How is his post any different ....what makes it NOT SUBSTANTIVE?
How can we post here unless we understand the RULES?Comment
-
Babies survive ectopic pregnancies. It might be more common to survive that situation than not.Originally posted by glorydaz View PostWhere is the evidence for a global flood?
E≈mc2 "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"
"The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
-Bob B.Comment
-
Look a little further... http://americanrtl.org/files/docs/Jo...transplant.pdfOriginally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
"Does it not look possible..." he says, that baby that begins in the tube can be transplanted into the uterus.
Anything is possible...flying without an airplane might seem possible, too.Comment
-
How? There is no room to grow in a fallopian tube. Transplant them to the uterus? I'm not seeing any documented cases of that being done.Originally posted by Stripe View PostComment
-
Not sure how. They can survive without help. Even undiagnosed.Originally posted by glorydaz View PostWhere is the evidence for a global flood?
E≈mc2 "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"
"The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
-Bob B.Comment
-
There are two or three examples of a baby growing outside the womb... the abdominal cavity, for instance, when the women didn't even know they were pregnant. They had no pain from a baby trying to grow in the fallopian tube that would inevitable rupture.Originally posted by Stripe View Post
I'd say "undiagnosed" equates to lack of symptoms of pregnancy, and those were so rare that they shouldn't even be brought up as an example in the anti abortion argument. They are flat out flukes. Period.
So, are we so desperate to stand against abortion that we dare to suggest ectopic pregnancies must be endured by a woman in spite of the facts? I certainly hope not.
Comment
-
Nobody has said that.Originally posted by glorydaz View PostAre we so desperate to stand against abortion that we dare to suggest ectopic pregnancies must be endured by a woman in spite of the facts? I certainly hope not.
Furthermore, the ectopic pregnancy argument is raised by people trying to defend late-term abortion.Where is the evidence for a global flood?
E≈mc2 "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"
"The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
-Bob B.Comment
-
Good, I'm glad to hear that.Originally posted by Stripe View Post
Then that just shows how stupid they are. Just scoff at them.Furthermore, the ectopic pregnancy argument is raised by people trying to defend late-term abortion.Comment
-
I think the important thing is that abortion is seen as the answer to ectopic pregnancies when medical investigation and advance might save these mothers and kids.Originally posted by glorydaz View Post
However, pro-aborts only have an eye for justifying childkilling.Where is the evidence for a global flood?
E≈mc2 "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"
"The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
-Bob B.Comment
-
So, if a fetus becomes a danger to the mother, she should risk her life to carry it to term? Are you serious?Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
Also, at a larger scale, if you neither condone contraceptives nor legalized abortions for unwanted children, how do you ever implement population control? We have grown to 7 billion on this planet AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHER SPECIES!! Numerous species have gone extinct just in the last century as a direct result of human overbreeding. And right-wingers just seem to want to preach abstinence and wash their hands off addressing the actual problem. Help the beings that are already born!Comment
-
Try reading the thread before reacting.Originally posted by Amyrich View Post
We don't.Also, at a larger scale, if you neither condone contraceptives nor legalized abortions for unwanted children, how do you ever implement population control?
Keep the easy questions coming. They're, well, easy.
What's taken us so long?We have grown to 7 billion on this planet AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHER SPECIES!!
That's a rhetorical question. It's Darwinists, socialists and pro-aborts who have retarded the human population.
And you want to kill the unborn.Help the beings that are already born!Last edited by Stripe; March 14th, 2019, 07:32 AM.Where is the evidence for a global flood?
E≈mc2 "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"
"The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
-Bob B.Comment
-
if a baby is in a burning house and the mother would have to put herself at risk to rescue it, do you think she would hesitate? Are you serious?Originally posted by Amyrich View Post
nobody has mentioned contraceptives in this thread so farAlso, at a larger scale, if you neither condone contraceptives
of course we don't condone legalized murder of children, regardless of whether they are wanted or notnor legalized abortions for unwanted children
[MENTION=20895]Amyrich[/MENTION]
if a mother decides she no longer wants to be burdened with an infant or a toddler, should she be allowed to kill it?
if not, why not?
by raising the standard of living, how do you ever implement population control?
some have benefited, some haven'tWe have grown to 7 billion on this planet AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHER SPECIES!!
cite?Numerous species have gone extinct just in the last century as a direct result of human overbreeding.
is there any reason not to consider abstinence?And right-wingers just seem to want to preach abstinence
explainand wash their hands off addressing the actual problem.
human beings?Help the beings that are already born!Comment
Comment