Hooray For Pedophilia!

Gary K

New member
Banned
Just like homosexuality back in the seventies

Remember this thread? Every leftist mocked it as lunacy that pedophilia would be normalized in the US. Now the smarter ones are staying away from the subject, but those with shorter memories are jumping right in and saying it's a good thing that people who want to have sex with babies and little kids, and as a result destroying those children's lives, should be looked at as just people with a different sexual preference because a pedophile's behavior needs to be looked at with "tolerance", which in their eyes means accepted as normal. That completely abnormal and destructive behavior should just be accepted.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Remember this thread? Every leftist mocked it as lunacy that pedophilia would be normalized in the US. Now the smarter ones are staying away from the subject, but those with shorter memories are jumping right in and saying it's a good thing that people who want to have sex with babies and little kids, and as a result destroying those children's lives, should be looked at as just people with a different sexual preference because a pedophile's behavior needs to be looked at with "tolerance", which in their eyes means accepted as normal. That completely abnormal and destructive behavior should just be accepted.

Wow it's been less than a year since the tiresome bananahead went on vacation. It's been so nice with her gone it has seemed longer. :)
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
Wow it's been less than a year since the tiresome bananahead went on vacation. It's been so nice with her gone it has seemed longer. :)

The time span between these threads show just how fast things are sliding downhill and to the left at the same time. The left just keeps on getting bolder in their machinations. Now BLM advertises this kind of stuff on their website.
 

quip

BANNED
Banned
Remember this thread? Every leftist mocked it as lunacy that pedophilia would be normalized in the US. Now the smarter ones are staying away from the subject, but those with shorter memories are jumping right in and saying it's a good thing that people who want to have sex with babies and little kids, and as a result destroying those children's lives, should be looked at as just people with a different sexual preference because a pedophile's behavior needs to be looked at with "tolerance", which in their eyes means accepted as normal. That completely abnormal and destructive behavior should just be accepted.

Did you watch the video at all?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond

Hollywood Elites Rush To Normalize Pedophilia Before They're All Outed By Ghislaine Maxwell

August 21st, 2020
article-6853-3.jpg


U.S.—With Epstein’s infamous assistant Ghislaine Maxwell awaiting trial and testimony in prison, many celebrities, politicians, and entertainment industry elites are rushing to make pedophilia generally acceptable before they’re outed as patrons of Epstein’s notorious island.

“I’m not going to lie, this is going to be an uphill climb,” said actor and director Rudy Allan, “but it’s absolutely necessary in order to prevent the entire world from seeing us as depraved perverts. Well, actually, I guess we don’t mind that so much as we just want depravity and perversion to be considered completely valid sexual orientations. I mean, we’re pretty much there already, just have to check off one last box.”

According to Allan, the movement is gaining unprecedented cooperation from across industries and international political positions. From an unnamed prince in a small country off the coast of France, to fashion industry moguls, to famous musicians and actors, the push to make pedophilia mainstream is gaining traction.

“The gay rights movement took 30-40 years, but the transgender movement really only took about 5-10 years,” said a hopeful former US President from Arkansas who preferred to remain anonymous. “At that rate, we should be able to make this thing happen by the end of the year!”

“Honestly, the timing couldn’t be better,” says Oscar-winning actor Kelvin Smacey. “If this whole Epstein Island thing had come out before we had fully integrated things like transgender children and Drag Queen Story Hour into mainstream values, we’d be totally doomed. Nowadays, we’ve got so many letters crammed into the whole ‘LGBTQETC+’ thing, nobody even notices if we slide a ‘P’ in there somewhere!”

In addition to those subtle changes, the ramp-up includes bolder strategies, such as a California proposal that will make it okay for 22-year-olds to have relations with 13-year-olds, a new streaming series about an 11-year-old girl defying her family’s outdated traditions by dancing sensually, or simply tweeting pro-pedo slogans like “love has no age” from popular drag queen associations.

While the momentum has recently increased, Allan says they’ve been laying down the groundwork for decades.

“I mean, we’ve got award-winning movies and shows featuring minors in sexual situations,” Allan says. “We’ve got drag shows for toddlers, school curriculum developed to get children thinking about exploring their sexuality really early on, and clothing lines designed to show off their bodies. We’ve implemented various strategies to reduce parental influence and protection over their children by weakening the family structure and encouraging promiscuity. And that’s not even mentioning abortion. Like, once you’re okay with casually slaughtering babies by the millions, how is anyone going to take issue with objectifying kids?”

According to Allan, next steps include Kidnapper Story Hour at the library, human sacrifices at public schools, a competitive reality TV series called Six-Year-Old Strippers, and outlawing millstones within 40 miles of any large body of water.



https://babylonbee.com/news/hollywo...able-before-theyre-outed-by-ghislaine-maxwell
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Any specific proposals being debated on this subject in D.C.?

Else, it sounds like slippery-slope fear mongering to me.

The video supports a psycological, rational approach to pedophilia as apposed to an emotional/violent one. Take a listen.

The slippery slope fallacy is a common one with those not overly blessed in the rational thinking department. It's also telling that some of these wingnuts had no problem with Phil "Quack Quack" Robertson's "advice" about getting girls when they're 15...
 

Rusha

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
The slippery slope fallacy is a common one with those not overly blessed in the rational thinking department. It's also telling that some of these wingnuts had no problem with Phil "Quack Quack" Robertson's "advice" about getting girls when they're 15...

Yep, I was just thinking the same thing ... Super creepy ...
 
Last edited:

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Bill's dead --
Wiener’s SB145 would['ve] create[d] parity by giving judges discretion over sex-offender registration in all cases involving voluntary intercourse between teenagers ages 14 to 17, who cannot legally consent, and adults who are less than 10 years older.

Oh, I remember this, the bill wasn't anything that the right was trying to make it out to be.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Oh, I remember this, the bill wasn't anything that the right was trying to make it out to be.

quip

Found it:
Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, “sexual intercourse” (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.

This distinction in the law — which is irrational, at best — disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse. For example, if an 18 year old straight man has vaginal intercourse with his 17 year old girlfriend, he is guilty of a crime, but he is not automatically required to register as a sex offender; instead, the judge will decide based on the facts of the case whether registration is warranted. By contrast, if an 18 year old gay man has sex with his 17 year old boyfriend, the judge *must* place him on the sex offender registry, no matter what the circumstances.


SB 145 does not apply for anyone 14 years or younger.

Currently, there are several non-forcible, “consensual” sexual offenses involving minors which require lifetime sex offender registration. These cases involve minors who are having a sexual relationship with someone over the age of 18. Although minors cannot legally consent to sexual activity, the cases are viewed as “consensual” because the sexual activity is not forced and the minor is a willing participant.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
ummmm

wait, what?

what's the "L" stand for?

Vaginal intercourse as legally distinguished from vaginal penetration or oral intercourse.

Your source is as misleading as the original article taken down by I think it was Washington Pundit months ago. This doesn't legalize anything; adults convicted of non-forcible statutory rape have to serve their time. "The bill would not shield anyone from the requirement to register as a sex offender. Rather, it would leave that decision, in eligible cases, to the discretion of the presiding judge."

San Francisco – Today, Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) introduced Senate Bill 145 to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry. Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, “sexual intercourse” (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted.

SB 145 does not change whether or not particular behavior is a crime and does not change the potential sentence for having sex with an underage person. Rather, the bill simply gives judges the ability to evaluate whether or not to require registration as a sex offender. To be clear, this judicial discretion for sex offender registration is *already* the law for vaginal intercourse between a 15-17 year old and someone up to 10 years older. SB 145 simply extends that discretion to other forms of intercourse. A judge will still be able to place someone on the registry if the behavior at issue was predatory or otherwise egregious. This change will treat straight and LGBT young people equally, end the discrimination against LGBT people, and ensure that California stops stigmatizing LGBT sexual relationships.

(SB 145 does not apply to intercourse of any kind with minors who are age 14 or younger. For those crimes, mandatory sex offender registration will continue to be the case for all forms of intercourse.)
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
And so, regarding the relaxation of punishment for molesting children:

For: anna, artie, quip
Against: me and every sane person in the world

:thumb:
 
Top