Outlawing Abortion: The Office of the President and the Legislative Process.

Jacob

BANNED
Banned
What could we accomplish if I were the President of the United States of America? What can be accomplished by a President? How do we assure that it is (accomplished)?
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
I do not know what it is that you do not know. The question is likely now how to do this.
I told you how. By making it illegal.
What could we accomplish if I were the President of the United States of America? What can be accomplished by a President? How do we assure that it is (accomplished)?
Not saying you wouldn't be a good leader, but we wouldn't be able to accomplish much if you were president.

If you were the king, however, that's a different story entirely.
 

Jacob

BANNED
Banned
I told you how. By making it illegal.Not saying you wouldn't be a good leader, but we wouldn't be able to accomplish much if you were president.

If you were the king, however, that's a different story entirely.
My understanding is that we have no King in the United States of America. What can the President do, including the legislative process? Presidents can accomplish a lot.

Yes. Not the declaring of abortion to be illegal, but actually making it illegal. What can the President do alone? How can the legislative process work? This is not a judge interpreting preexisting law, except God's Law, the Torah. This alone would be worth the effort and becoming President. I thank you for implying that I may make a good leader.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
My understanding is that we have no King in the United States of America.

Correct.

In an ideal world, though, America would not have a president, congress, House of Rep., or Senate. She would have a King.

What can the President do, including the legislative process? Presidents can accomplish a lot.

Not really.

Yes. Not the declaring of abortion to be illegal, but actually making it illegal. What can the President do alone?

Not very much.

How can the legislative process work?

I encourage you to go have a look at my "Advocation of Government" thread.

This is not a judge interpreting preexisting law, except God's Law, the Torah. This alone would be worth the effort and becoming President. I thank you for implying that I may make a good leader.

Certainly a better leader than the current government could ever provide.
 

Jacob

BANNED
Banned
Correct.

In an ideal world, though, America would not have a president, congress, House of Rep., or Senate. She would have a King.



Not really.



Not very much.



I encourage you to go have a look at my "Advocation of Government" thread.



Certainly a better leader than the current government could ever provide.

Maybe you can provide a link to your thread? I looked through two pages of threads in Politics.

Why a King?

What about legislation?

We have a Constitution to defend.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Maybe you can provide a link to your thread? I looked through two pages of threads in Politics.

Just use the search box to look for: "An Advocation of Government"

Why a King?

Well, for starters, Monarchy is the purest form of government. A single point of accountability often rightly motivates.

What about legislation?

For what? Excluding the criminal code and the constitution, the King would be the one to implement, amend, and revoke laws pertaining to infrastructure use and zoning. No amendments to the Constitution (not the one we have currently, but a new one) and the Criminal Code would be permitted. The Monarch alone would be allowed to amend only America’s Code of Use.

We have a Constitution to defend.

Our constitution is unconstitutional.

Read Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation.
 

Jacob

BANNED
Banned
Just use the search box to look for: "An Advocation of Government"
Okay. Much easier with a computer.
Well, for starters, Monarchy is the purest form of government. A single point of accountability often rightly motivates.
Interesting. Are you a Citizen of the United States of America? I am.
For what? Excluding the criminal code and the constitution, the King would be the one to implement, amend, and revoke laws pertaining to infrastructure use and zoning. No amendments to the Constitution (not the one we have currently, but a new one) and the Criminal Code would be permitted. The Monarch alone would be allowed to amend only America’s Code of Use.

Our constitution is unconstitutional.

Read Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation.
Interesting to see an the Articles of Confederation.

What do you believe makes the Constitution unconstitutional? Do you believe that it contradicts itself? In what way are you wanting to say that it is unconstitutional?

I understand that the Constitutional Monarchy idea is not your idea.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Okay. Much easier with a computer.
Interesting. Are you a Citizen of the United States of America? I am.

Yes, I am.

Interesting to see an the Articles of Confederation.

What do you believe makes the Constitution unconstitutional? Do you believe that it contradicts itself? In what way are you wanting to say that it is unconstitutional?

It is in violation of Article 13 of the AoC, which were the original government documents in the USA.

I understand that the Constitutional Monarchy idea is not your idea.

Right.
 

Kit the Coyote

New member
Our constitution is unconstitutional.

Read Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation.

Every State shall abide by the determination of the United States in Congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them. And the Articles of this Confederation shall be inviolably observed by every State, and the Union shall be perpetual; nor shall any alteration at any time hereafter be made in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a Congress of the United States, and be afterwards confirmed by the legislatures of every State.

Since the current Constitution was agreed to by a Congress of the United States and afterward confirmed by the legislatures of every state, I'm not sure how you base this argument.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Only if it's Jesus ....

A monarchy is not a theocracy, Doc.

I said king. Not God.

I need to get back to this thread...I have a post that needs an answer from me.

Can't wait to hear it!

Since the current Constitution was agreed to by a Congress of the United States and afterward confirmed by the legislatures of every state, I'm not sure how you base this argument.


Every State shall abide by the determination of the United States in Congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them. And the Articles of this Confederation shall be inviolably observed by every State, and the Union shall be perpetual; nor shall any alteration at any time hereafter be made in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a Congress of the United States, and be afterwards confirmed by the legislatures of every State.



The Constitution is not an alteration to the Articles of Confederation, it's a completely different document. And we don't even abide by the Articles anymore, even though it was a perpetual document that every State was to follow.

The Articles were signed in 1781. The Constitution wasn't signed until SIX YEARS LATER, in 1787.

That is how the constitution is unconstitutional, in that it is a new document made in direct violation (approving of something that violates the law makes one a criminal by association) of the 13th Article, which described the Articles as being a perpetual document. (Interestingly enough... The number 13 in the Bible signifies rebellion. :think: But that's neither here nor there... :idunno:)
 

Jacob

BANNED
Banned
Can I? Kind of. Will I? No.



See my above post.



What does my age have to do with anything?
It doesn't matter then. I noted that you said 23 in your thread. I think that there is something at 20 and at 25 on the Jewish calendar. Just interesting that you may be 25.
 
Top