What Kind Of Person Could "Execute" A Child?

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Abortion is the real execution of children that liberals will do anything to defend.

We can't even execute serial murdering rapists aged 40, let alone contemplate justice for a younger product of the just-a-system they love.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Abortion is the real execution of children that liberals will do anything to defend.

We can't even execute serial murdering rapists aged 40, let alone contemplate justice for a younger product of the just-a-system they love.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Stripe, please go and derail and bluster on one of your own threads, else, and as you well know, there's plenty of non far right wingers who are against abortion, Rusha being one of the more staunch on here.

Now, ya got anything on actual topic?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
That is the actual topic: "What Kind of Person Could Execute a Child?"

And the answer is: An Abortionist!

on the one hand we have the brutal and deliberate murder of an innnocent child, guilty of nothing other than being unloved, unvalued and unwanted by its mother and society


on the other hand, we have Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, who at ten years old, deliberately kidnapped, tortured and murdered James Bulger, a two year old chosen at random



in the first case, we hear "I don't want to talk about that!"

in the second case, we hear "Anyone who thinks Thompson and Venables should have been tried and executed is a psychopathic monster!" :dizzy:


by the way - Thompson and Venables were tried and found guilty and walk the streets free men today

oh wait - not Venable - he's been in trouble with the law ever since his release and is currently serving a three year term for child pornography charges

but soon enough he'll be free to molest other children
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
on the one hand we have the brutal and deliberate murder of an innnocent child, guilty of nothing other than being unloved, unvalued and unwanted by its mother and society


on the other hand, we have Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, who at ten years old, deliberately kidnapped, tortured and murdered James Bulger, a two year old chosen at random



in the first case, we hear "I don't want to talk about that!"

in the second case, we hear "Anyone who thinks Thompson and Venables should have been tried and executed is a psychopathic monster!" :dizzy:


by the way - Thompson and Venables were tried and found guilty and walk the streets free men today

oh wait - not Venable - he's been in trouble with the law ever since his release and is currently serving a three year term for child pornography charges

but soon enough he'll be free to molest other children
If we had a justice system — instead of "just a system" — their upbringings would have been tempered by the law, which would have never allowed a situation where they would commit the initial crime.

Murder should be a rare and shocking event, instead it is written into the regulations and largely ignored.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Which is exactly why they don't want to talk about it.

Really, you think people like Rusha haven't been vocally anti abortion through the years on here? It's not a case of not wanting to talk about it as you well know. There's plenty of threads where abortion has been the focus, this just doesn't happen to be one of them even though it was predictable that folk would try and muddy the waters.

Yeah. It's mind-boggling that on this site — of all places — a liberal could think she could get away with a title like that and have it not be about the world's No. 1 issue.

What isn't mind boggling is that you continually fudge the issue of the killing of children outside of the womb into that of abortion. Anything to avoid the actual topic.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Interesting, terminating a pregnancy after 2 months is the same as hanging an 8 year old.

Both are taking away a life of one who is created in the image of God. And that is the reason the LORD gives for capital punishment. Besides that, our "conscience" tells us that abortion is wrong and that is why so many women who have had an abortion in the past regret it afterwards and want to know if they can be forgiven by God for what they did.

https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/i-had-an-abortion

The Bible declares that even the guiltiest of people can find forgiveness when they believe the gospel. But there will be a loss of rewards in heaven for any Christian who defends abortion.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Abortion: executing children.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Again, I would have thought you and Jerry et al would have regarded the killing of the unborn as murder, not execution. Also, again, you have nothing to add to the topic of "executing" born children outside of the womb do you?

:rain:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Both are taking away a life of one who is created in the image of God. And that is the reason the LORD gives for capital punishment. Besides that, our "conscience" tells us that abortion is wrong and that is why so many women who have had an abortion in the past regret it afterwards and want to know if they can be forgiven by God for what they did.

https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/i-had-an-abortion

The Bible declares that even the guiltiest of people can find forgiveness when they believe the gospel. But there will be a loss of rewards in heaven for any Christian who defends abortion.

I wager that most people's consciences would tell them that executing children as young as six and to the point of stabbing them to death as "righteous punishment" is utterly unconscionable, but nobody really wants to talk about that, do they?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
I wager that most people's consciences would tell them that executing children as young as six and to the point of stabbing them to death as "righteous punishment" is utterly unconscionable, but nobody really wants to talk about that, do they?

I'd wager that you're going to continue to avoid explaining why Thompson and Venables didn't deserve to be executed for kidnapping, torturing and murdering James Bulger
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
What Kind Of Person Could "Execute" A Child?


me

I'd have no problem executing the ten year old on the right, who is in the process of kidnapping the little two year old on the left, so that he and his friend can spend the afternoon torturing and murdering him

james-bulger-jon-venables-and-robert-thompson-cctv-footage.jpg


here's the two ten year olds planning their crime:

fa0e365b569190639c5019230538ff7e.jpg


and here's the two of them leading their victim to his death:

1BC2C4E7000005DC-5109415-image-a-39_1511395094577.jpg




I'd have no problem springing the door, or throwing the switch, or casting the first stone at those two
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Doser, one more time. As you already know after having had things explained to you directly, I am not remotely interested in engaging you on a topic about anything at all. It's entirely up to you if you want to waste your time quoting posts by me and following me about but after this secondary reminder you're getting nothing at all. I'm not asking you to be barred from threads I start unless you spam them up with the trolling that landed you your latest ban.

You clear now?

Cool.

:e4e:
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
and it's worth noting, for those retards who whine on incessantly about "consent", that these two ten year old murderers "consented" to murder their victim deliberately and maliciously

I wouldn't recommend opening this unless you want to be sick to your stomach (no, it's not pics):
Spoiler
Closed-circuit television (CCTV), surveillance from the New Strand Shopping Centre in Bootle taken on Friday 12 February 1993 showed Thompson and Venables casually observing children, apparently selecting a target.[7] The boys were playing truant from school, which they did regularly.[8] Throughout the day, Thompson and Venables were seen stealing various items including sweets, a troll doll, some batteries and a can of blue paint,[9] some of which were later found at the murder scene. One of the boys later revealed that they were planning to find a child to abduct, lead him to the busy road alongside the shopping centre, and push him into the path of oncoming traffic.[10]

That same afternoon, Bulger, from nearby Kirkby, went with his mother, Denise, to the New Strand Shopping Centre. Whilst inside the A. R. Tym's butcher's shop on the lower floor of the centre at around 15:40, Denise, who had been temporarily distracted, realised that her son had disappeared.[3][11] Thompson and Venables approached him and took him by the hand, leading him out of the shopping centre.[12][13] The moment was caught on CCTV at 15:42.[14][15] Thompson and Venables took Bulger on a meandering 2.5-mile (4 km) walk across Liverpool to the Leeds and Liverpool Canal where he was dropped on his head and suffered injuries to his face. The boys joked about pushing Bulger into the canal.[8][16] During the walk across Liverpool, the boys were seen by 38 people.[17]

Bulger had a bump on his forehead and was crying, but most bystanders did nothing to intervene.[18][19] Two people challenged Thompson and Venables, but they claimed Bulger was their younger brother or that he was lost and they were taking him to the local police station.[20] At one point, the boys took Bulger into a pet shop, from which they were ejected.[16] Eventually the boys arrived in the village of Walton, and with Walton Lane police station across the road facing them, they hesitated and led Bulger up a steep bank to a railway line near the disused Walton & Anfield railway station, close to Anfield Cemetery, where they began torturing him.[8]
James Bulger being abducted by Thompson (above Bulger) and Venables (holding Bulger's hand) in an image recorded on shopping centre CCTV

One of the boys threw blue Humbrol modelling paint, which they had stolen earlier, into Bulger's left eye.[21] They kicked him, stamped on him and threw bricks and stones at him. Batteries were placed in Bulger's mouth and,[22] according to police, some batteries may have been inserted into his anus, although none were found.[3] Finally, the boys dropped a 22-pound (10.0 kg) iron bar, described in court as a railway fishplate, on Bulger.[23][24][25] He sustained 10 skull fractures as a result of the bar striking his head. Dr Alan Williams, the case's pathologist, stated that Bulger suffered so many injuries —42 in total— that none could be isolated as the fatal blow.[26] Thompson and Venables laid Bulger across the railway tracks and weighted his head down with rubble, in the hope that a train would hit him and make his death appear to be an accident. After they left the scene, his body was cut in half by a train.[27] Bulger's severed body was discovered two days later on 14 February.[8] A forensic pathologist testified that he had died before he was struck by the train.[27]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger



and those who celebrate man's law over God's will note that it's incorrect to call them "murderers", as that is a legal term that doesn't apply to minors
 
Top