Why Don't the Liberals Want a Wall?

[ok doser]

The right to murder is not being debated morally, constitutionally nor practically.....so your answer is an astounding 'no'.

Likewise a 'no' to your next urge in response.

Ummmmm

Abortion is murder

[quip]

Ummmmm

Abortion is murder

You're as predictable as thick.

[Arthur Brain]

You're as predictable as thick.

[Clete]

Well, that was a nice rant signifying nothing...

See what I mean!?

[Jerry Shugart]

You seem unwilling to weigh the pros and cons. Seems you've reached a kneejerk conclusion in search of a justification.

I am the one who is supporting a solution, and that solution is the wall.

The Dems have no solution and all they want to do is to obstruct any solution which others might come up with.

Those are the pros and cons and I have indeed weighed them. Have you?

Do you favor Trump's plan or are you willing to let the evil at the border continue for the rest of Trump's term in office in the hope that the Dems will win and do it their way?

Tell us what you think is the best solution.

[Arthur Brain]

See what I mean!?

Sure, you're one of the most reasonable posters on this forum who so very rarely posts in a fit of pique at all...

[quip]

I am the one who is supporting a solution, and that solution is the wall.

The Dems have no solution and all they want to do is to obstruct any solution which others might come up with.

Those are the pros and cons and I have indeed weighed them. Have you?

Do you favor Trump's plan or are you willing to let the evil at the border continue for the rest of Trump's term in office in the hope that the Dems will win and do it their way?

Tell us what you think is the best solution.

I don't presume to know the best solution until I study all the pertinent facts. I was hoping to glean some info on the issue you raised...but you seem to have concluded upon the overall issue by your own undisclosed methods, however biased and limited those may appear.

[glassjester]

The right to murder is not being debated morally, constitutionally nor practically.....so your answer is an astounding 'no'.

So we agree that the underground (or "back alley") continuation of a criminalized activity, is not an argument for it to remain legal.

[quip]

So we agree that the underground (or "back alley") continuation of a criminalized activity, is not an argument for it to remain legal.

No we don't. Such would hold under the rubric of women's safety/health; access i.e. practical considerations.

[Rusha]

No we don't. Such would hold under the rubric of women's safety/health i.e. practical considerations.

For this administration, well being equates to jailing babies, toddlers and children in cages. I am fairly certain that safety and health comes in last on their list of priorities.

[glassjester]

No we don't. Such would hold under the rubric of women's safety/health; access i.e. practical considerations.

The mere fact that people will break a law, is an argument against making that law?

I don't see the logic, there.

[glassjester]

For this administration,well being equals jailing babies, toddlers and children in cages, I am fairly certain that safety and health comes in last on their list of priorities.

Do you also think abortion should remain legal, just so people won't "have to" murder their babies in "back alleys" ?

[quip]

The mere fact that people will break a law, is an argument against making that law?

I don't see the logic, there.

Then take your logical discourse to a deeper level.

[glassjester]

Then take your logical discourse to a deeper level.

lol - nice burn!

[glassjester]

Then take your logical discourse to a deeper level.

People break every law, dude. Is that an argument against making any laws at all?