Q Anon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jefferson

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
[h=5]Obama's Corrupt Book Deal with Pearson Publishing[/h] 27 Dec 2019 - 4:58:48 PM

09a582c70baf01d06dce08c72d35880feb518900171a0b8c53ad592bc636cd64.png


https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1210328992684707840

US Taxpayer > FED Gov't
FED Gov't [HUSSEIN] > Pearson Publishing
Pearson Publishing > [HUSSEIN]
BIDEN?
Follow the money.
Corruption.
Q
 
User Name

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Jefferson said:
Q's drop does not say the year would be 2017.
Click to expand...

That's all too convenient of an excuse, don't you think? Q posted on Nov. 1, 2017 that Podesta would be arrested on Nov. 4th. If the year wasn't supposed to be 2017, what year do you think Q was referring to?

When will you come to realize that Q is nothing but a con-job designed by a few anonymous Trump supporters who are working behind the scenes to gin up support for Trump among people such as yourself?
 
Jefferson

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
User Name: Q will also post fake predictions to get the deep state to waste "ammunition." The deep state will create events to take media attention off other events that could sway public opinion against their interests. That kind of ammunition is hard to come by so the Q anon team tricks them into wasting it. The Trump administration is not just another 4 year election. It is a military intelligence operation designed to take down the deep state.
 
User Name

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Jefferson said:
User Name: Q will also post fake predictions to get the deep state to waste "ammunition."
Click to expand...

He's a clever one, this Q...What predictions has Q made that have come true?

What about all these promises of mass arrests? When is Clinton going to be sent off to Guantanamo? When is the "storm" going to strike? Trump has been president for almost 3 years now. Q makes lots of promises, no delivery.
 
Last edited:
Jefferson

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
[h=5]CIA Director Gina Haspel Knew about the Spygate Operation in the UK and Is Working with John Durham[/h] 28 Dec 2019 - 12:33:17 PM

22d59464f25f7200c8444c145d06ff07faca8a04c0947a330c02041358917e72.jpg


https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1210593915008638976

Haspel made Dir for a specific reason?
Brennan 'tapped' directly for support?
Brennan CLAS SEC DIV > spy_T?
IF C_A WAS RUNNING BLACK OP [spy_T] IN UK WOULD HASPEL [STATION CHIEF] BE INFORMED AND INSTRUCTED?
MI6?
Meeting(s) w/ Durham?
The only way to restore faith is through transparency and accountability.
Q
 
Jefferson

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
[h=5]FBI and Crowdstrike Concealed the Real Source of the DNC Data Breach (Seth Rich) and Framed Russia[/h] 28 Dec 2019 - 1:23:27 PM
DNC server(s).
Crowdstrike.
Did Russia 'break-in' to DNC server(s)?
Why did FBI accept 'indirect' evidence re: DNC server(s) 'hack''break-in' by Crowdstrike [Ukraine]?
Why didn't FBI 'directly' investigate DNC server(s) [in-hand]?
Download speed internal data DL vs remote? [1]

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...ur_source_was_not_the_russian_government.html

[1]
How does one provide content to WL?
>comp-to-comp
>person-to-person [1]
Personal comms [secured] prior to release? [1]
The (Source(s)):
>Feeder [1]
>Recipient [1]
Interning for the DNC can be deadly.
Does Crowdstrike possess 'gov_capablity' to trace 'break-in' route(s)?
Does Crowdstrike possess 'gov_capability' re: foreign intercepts?
Possible to layer/insert code [Crowdstrike] to designate intruder [intended target]?
NSA data_bridge DNC-Crowdstrike [bulk data collection]
Matters of National Security [Highest Levels].
FISA is only the beginning.
The hole is DEEP.
Q
 
Jefferson

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
[h=5]The DNC Data Breach Download Speed Points to an Internal Leak, Not an External Hack[/h] 28 Dec 2019 - 1:30:29 PM

Anonymous28 Dec 2019 - 1:28:43 PM

652133b0cebd48699b11c279c83891eceee037d27b71f3c8e89a2ddfe36a4c78.png


orensicator’s first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.

These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed. Compounding this contradiction, Guccifer claimed to have run his hack from Romania, which, for numerous reasons technically called delivery overheads, would slow down the speed of a hack even further from maximum achievable speeds.

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
Click to expand...
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
User Name said:
That's all too convenient of an excuse, don't you think? Q posted on Nov. 1, 2017 that Podesta would be arrested on Nov. 4th. If the year wasn't supposed to be 2017, what year do you think Q was referring to?

When will you come to realize that Q is nothing but a con-job designed by a few anonymous Trump supporters who are working behind the scenes to gin up support for Trump among people such as yourself?
Click to expand...

I doubt that he is and that's exactly what this type of wingnut outfit rely on. Play to the paranoia and gullibility of people and thinly disguise it as legitimate and insightful. It's like scam artists although plenty of those are a lot more convincing...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top