Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

“No sex was used to produce this child!”

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by musterion View Post
    Anal sodomy is a fact of civil rights? For children? You are evil and you will burn in the Lake of Fire lest you repent, receiving a love of the Truth. You're still breathing so it's not too late for you yet.

    What have I said here that's false? Oh, that's right...you like to accuse people of lies when all they do is accurately point out what your ilk engage in and want children to do.
    Will you provide actual references for your claims about children being taught how to engage in anal sex in the school?

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
      I don't consider LGBTQ advocacy research to be valid.
      do you have any reason other than your own prejudice?

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by TracerBullet View Post
        Will you provide actual references for your claims about children being taught how to engage in anal sex in the school?
        How soon you forget. Or pretend to forget.

        http://www.massresistance.org/docs/i...te/tape01.html
        "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
        Terence Mc Lean

        [most will be very surprised]


        Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
        By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by musterion View Post
          How soon you forget. Or pretend to forget.

          http://www.massresistance.org/docs/i...te/tape01.html
          wow undocumented garbage from a hate group. Well I'm convinced

          Comment


          • #80
            You didn't listen? Ears too delicate?
            "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
            Terence Mc Lean

            [most will be very surprised]


            Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
            By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by musterion View Post
              You didn't listen? Ears too delicate?
              well lets take a look at the facts. I know you hate facts but....

              It was a student who brought up the topic of fisting and asked what was and was provided with an explanation of the practice of both the heterosexual and homosexual forms of it.

              The educator answering the question was fired but successfully sued to be reinstated showing that the tapes MassResistance published had been altered.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by musterion View Post
                You didn't listen? Ears too delicate?
                I don't think that's it. I think the big problem is many people on this forum don't understand what a reputable source is. A blog post or an article with no citation isn't acceptable, no matter what side of the argument it comes from. A source is not an opinion, but a presentation of facts validated from a variety of perspectives. If others were more willing to at least try to bring these kinds of materials into the discussions, I feel it would be a lot more productive.
                -Q
                "The Man. The Myth. The Legend!"

                Comment


                • #83
                  @Tracer, Quetzal:

                  First, it is fitting and proper to be suspicious of an advocacy group. A political campaign is not unbiased. They can't be.

                  Second, why do I need to justify nature, biology, ancestry, genetics, tradition, religion against a new fangled movement???

                  Third, if you think there are no ethical problems/considerations/conflicts to third party reproduction, you are VERY misinformed.
                  Google it. It is a meta-ethical issue globally.
                  And will continue to be debated throughout the coming decades.
                  Last edited by GFR7; May 8th, 2015, 09:46 AM.
                  He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
                  ~Daniel 2:22

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
                    @Tracer, Quetzal:

                    First, it is fitting and proper to be suspicious of an advocacy group. A political campaign is not unbiased. They can't be.

                    Second, why do I need to justify nature, biology, ancestry, genetics, tradition, religion against a new fangled movement???

                    Third, if you think there are no ethical problems/considerations/conflicts to third party reproduction, you are VERY misinformed.
                    Google it. It is a meta-ethical issue globally.
                    And will continue to be debated throughout the coming decades.
                    so no reason other than your own prejudice

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by TracerBullet View Post
                      so no reason other than your own prejudice
                      Huh? Caring about the rights of children is mere prejudice?
                      He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
                      ~Daniel 2:22

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
                        @Tracer, Quetzal:

                        First, it is fitting and proper to be suspicious of an advocacy group. A political campaign is not unbiased. They can't be.

                        Second, why do I need to justify nature, biology, ancestry, genetics, tradition, religion against a new fangled movement???

                        Third, if you think there are no ethical problems/considerations/conflicts to third party reproduction, you are VERY misinformed.
                        Google it. It is a meta-ethical issue globally.
                        And will continue to be debated throughout the coming decades.
                        You are either too lazy to defend your own argument properly or you can't do it at all. Either way is fine with me.
                        -Q
                        "The Man. The Myth. The Legend!"

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Quetzal View Post
                          You are either too lazy to defend your own argument properly or you can't do it at all. Either way is fine with me.
                          I don't have to defend it. I know the facts. You would never accept them because it goes against your agenda.
                          He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
                          ~Daniel 2:22

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
                            I don't have to defend it. I know the facts. You would never accept them because it goes against your agenda.
                            You don't know that. Despite popular belief, if someone presents me sound evidence to the opposite side of an argument, I will accept it. My beliefs are dynamic and change if I am presented with something to support it. By the same token, if your argument is crap and your sources are crap, I will not change my mind.
                            -Q
                            "The Man. The Myth. The Legend!"

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Quetzal View Post
                              You don't know that. Despite popular belief, if someone presents me sound evidence to the opposite side of an argument, I will accept it. My beliefs are dynamic and change if I am presented with something to support it. By the same token, if your argument is crap and your sources are crap, I will not change my mind.
                              OK, you say that, but I have my doubts--

                              if you have no respect or concern for the ethics violations which occur when poor women are exploited for their wombs and their eggs; for the health risks incurred;

                              for the adult children who resent that they grew up alienated from their biological parent and ancestry; if you're not willing to even reflect on them----

                              what can I say?

                              Here are some links:

                              Hastings Center: Ethics and 3rd party assisted reproduction

                              http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Pub...l.aspx?id=2210

                              Study Guide on Legal , Ethical, Moral questions re 3rd party reproduction: http://cbc-network.org/pdfs/CBC_Thin...tudy_Guide.pdf.

                              Ethics of third party reproduction:

                              http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters...-183-12-00.pdf

                              Ethical Challenges of New Reproductive Technologies- S Callahan (PDF available online)

                              He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
                              ~Daniel 2:22

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
                                Huh? Caring about the rights of children is mere prejudice?


                                rejecting legitimate research because it doesn't prop up you petty prejudices isn't caring about children. It's actively harming them. Just like your advocating for discrimination harms not just children but everyone.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X