1. Why was a FaceBook webpage for the alleged dead teacher Victoria Soto of Sandy Hook Elementary School posted before the event occurred?
Most plausibly someone created the page prior to the shootings and then changed the purpose of the page after they saw what had taken place. I'm pretty sure it's possible to change the theme of a facebook page.
anyone who’s been around the block knows that malformed Google searches have been known to happen. Heck, sometimes they even cause United Airlines’ stock price to fall 11 percent in one day (in just one widely known example of Google date-stamping a search result incorrectly). And, hey, look, the same Daily Caller report eventually reveals that they obtained an email sent by a Google engineer to a “public relations firm contracted by the United Way” in which the engineer flat out says, “This is a technical glitch on our end.”
But, sure, time travel — or, you know ... ‘United Way was involved in a false flag operation’ — those are definitely some totally plausible possibilities that journalists should absolutely be exploring.
link |
2. Why was the United Way charity webpage for Sandy Hook posted before the event occurred?
To understand the Sandy Hook websites that seem to have been published early, you must first understand the way the internet reconciles dates as well as how Google crawls them. If a page is repurposed to host other information than it originally displayed, it may show up as having been “published” earlier.
Further, servers and sites often have incorrect dates. Having used a number of WordPress panels in my career, it is a job to keep track of where dates and times are set in order to avoid publishing in the past when scheduling a post, something that could be at play and an easily explainable factor not often acknowledged by Sandy Hook truthers.
And given the fact material can run afoul on an individual computer, a site’s panel and then a search engine, sites like the United Way’s Sandy Hook page could easily register as a prior date on Google.
(Reddit breaks it down in minute detail on this thread — even explaining to Sandy Hook truthers that source code from the United Way’s page indicate it was indeed repurposed for the Newtown incident after it was initially created for a different reason.)
But what about the Vicki Soto Facebook page, created days before her death? Much like the situation with Sandy Hook sites on Google, Facebook’s dating system can be messy in establishing a timeline.
Everyone looking to make money off Facebook seeks the next big social story, and the Newtown incident was very, very well trafficked. A person seeking to create a group that is simply popular could have easily converted an existing group to a memorial page for Victoria Soto and the time stamp wouldn’t match the timeline.
Much has been made of the Sandy Hook websites allegedly published early, but the simplest explanation is often correct — and Sandy Hook truthers have perhaps selected the most unstable bit of “evidence” to support their conspiracy theory.
link |
3. How did the Arlington Red Devils website post the book on Talking With Children/Students About the Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting on 12/10/2012 (which was contained in the page url), 4 days before the event occurred? If this were some kind of technical glitch, then how did Google’s bots manage to record a cached page for 12/13/2012, still 1 day before the Sandy Hook shooting happened?
See above
4. How did John Trentacosta (whose house was next to the Lanzas with a lot of activity occurring there at the time), who was CEO of the local Newton bank, start a victims’ fund on the same day so quickly after the event, after receiving in his words “countless requests” to do so? Is it just a coincidence that Trentacosta was also a member of a new council of the New York Federal Reserve, the Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council?
Someone in the community doing anything they can to help out as soon as they can isn't evidence of a conspiracy, it's evidence of peoples humanity in the face of tragedy.
5. According to various researchers, why was the Newtown community seeded with new families in the years leading up to the event?
Source? I am unsure what this claim is referring to. "According to various researchers". Who are these researchers and what were their specific claims?
6. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why were 16 state troopers pre-positioned 45-60 minutes before the alleged shooting?
A lot of the 33 questions begin the same way, "According to Wolfgang Halbig". I'd have to see his evidence before addressing 'he said' claims.
For now:
7. Why did the media keep switching its narrative as the story unfolded regarding the actual weapon used? Finally they settled upon a rifle. But how could a rifle kill 26 people in such quick succession?
This is easily done with an AR-15
8. Why did known actor and Sandy Hook witness Gene Rosen keep changing his story about how he encountered the 6 kids who allegedly came to him? In different interviews he variously claims he found the kids just after feeding his cats in the loft, just after going to breakfast and just after coming home from breakfast. His testimony completely conflicts with that of the school bus driver and the official report. There is also video of him near the fire house walking around slowly, plus a video of him rehearsing his lines with the cameraman …
He was mistaken? He was confused? This is a problem with reliability of eyewitness testimony in general, not evidence of a conspiracy. Where is the video of him "rehearsing his lines"?
9. How was a skinny 19-year-old boy with no military training capable of killing 26 people clean while injuring none? (Trained military veterans have claimed it was highly unlikely or even impossible for someone with the weight of Adam Lanza to execute that many people in so short a time.)
Address previously. Further, what "Trained military veterans" have claimed this and wouldn't it be easier to kill a bunch of kids trapped in classrooms that it would be combatants on the field of battle?
Also, who said that Lanza injured none?
Police: Second person injured in Connecticut school shooting survived
| Connecticut State Police Lt. Paul Vance confirmed that a second adult was injured and survived, saying both were wounded in the "lower extremities." |
10. Why was there no evidence of blood? A total of 26 fatalities (children and adult) would produce at least at a conservative estimate 20 gallons (75 liters) of blood. Thus would require a concerted blood cleanup (blood is considered a biohazard in this type of situation), yet when Sofia Smallstorm asked who did the cleanup, all the departments were ignorant of it and even claimed that no one did the cleanup.
Source? When I searched I found that
Clean Harbors, Inc cleaned up after Sandy Hook.
