Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Thread Where You Link To Stripe's Best Evidence-Based Posts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Arthur Brain View Post
    What evidence? Why isn't any of it up for peer review? Science doesn't work on personal agenda as any theory is held to stringent testing to hold water as viable. So why is Brown's work disregarded? You've yet to even attempt to answer this.
    The only way to find out is to read it for yourself.

    Or you could just believe what is most popularly believed. Up to you.
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Nick M View Post
      Talk about a huge stretch. There isn't any evidence, it is "interpreted" to mean what you want it to mean.
      No evidence??! Accepted by practically the whole of the scientific community on a global scale? I don't interpret it doofus. You just have a brick wall of theology that can't stand to be refuted so you'll just continue to do ostrich impressions...

      Wrong again. It took a long time to get around the political pressure for the global warming nonsense to get refuted by the experts in the field. It was popular without proof because of political pressure. Now it is gone since the email hacking, and charges of scientific misconduct. For example.
      Yeah Nick. Man does nothing to affect the atmosphere of this planet at all. He's a great steward of the earth and it's inhabitants in general. There's no reason to be concerned by any shifting climate change whatsoever.


      Of course there is an agenda. They are Christ hating pigs just like you.
      What's the agenda? Did these evil scientists do you a disservice by inventing the computer and the world wide web you participate on? Stop being such a whiny flaming hypocrite.

      Romans 1

      18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools,


      See, scientists discovered this thing called a 747. Then they saw the blueprints and schematics. But it was decided by peer review that the blueprints weren't drawn by anybody, the ink just lined up like that on the paper by random chance, then the parts of the plane came together in perfect order by sheer chance.

      Brainless moron....

      retard77
      Dude, if the latter is a nod to the old "747 being assembled in a scrapyard by chance" then you've missed the entire point of evolution from a theistic perspective to begin with you berk!!



      As to your latter 'insults' then....hey. Same ole same old really. You're a thirty odd year old guy who should have grown out of his nappies by now.

      Well this is fun isn't it?

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Stripe View Post
        The only way to find out is to read it for yourself.

        Or you could just believe what is most popularly believed. Up to you.
        Why isn't it up for peer review? What do you think is stopping such? An honest answer please?

        Well this is fun isn't it?

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Arthur Brain View Post
          Why isn't it up for peer review? What do you think is stopping such? An honest answer please?
          Get back to us when you're ready to talk evidence.
          Where is the evidence for a global flood?
          E≈mc2
          "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

          "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
          -Bob B.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Stripe View Post
            Get back to us when you're ready to talk evidence.
            "Us"? Why can't you give an honest answer as to why YEC isn't even given status as credible science? What's the problem? Why is it not open to peer review? The evidence for an old earth is overwhelming and all you seem to do is parrot what you read from Walt Brown. Why would the scientific community worldwide make up this stuff dude? Go on, be original and answer that.

            Well this is fun isn't it?

            Comment


            • #96
              Nick revives ancient creationist dishonesty:
              See, scientists discovered this thing called a 747. Then they saw the blueprints and schematics. But it was decided by peer review that the blueprints weren't drawn by anybody, the ink just lined up like that on the paper by random chance, then the parts of the plane came together in perfect order by sheer chance.

              Hard to believe that Nick actually believes anyone here is stupid enough to think evolution works by sheer chance.

              He's either an moron, or he thinks everyone else here is a moron.

              Comment


              • #97
                Stripe on the Hydroplate Theory - with pretty pictures.
                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                E≈mc2
                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                -Bob B.

                Comment


                • #98
                  More Hydroplates.
                  Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                  E≈mc2
                  "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                  "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                  -Bob B.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Go Stripe Go!

                    We don't tell our children fairy tales so that they will know that monsters exist.
                    They already know monsters exist.
                    We tell our children fairy tales so that they will know that monsters can be killed.

                    Comment


                    • Darn, I thought maybe Stipe would link to the post where he showed us his math that disproves evolution.

                      But I guess he must have lost it, or something...

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
                        Darn, I thought maybe Stipe would link to the post where he showed us his math that disproves evolution. But I guess he must have lost it, or something...


                        Brabrarian.
                        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                        E≈mc2
                        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                        -Bob B.

                        Comment


                        • Yep. Stipe's lost it. (so to speak) He made the mistake of claiming he had math that refuted evolution. Every now and then, I remind him about it; he still gets upset about it. I'm hoping one of these times he'll man up and make an attempt to show us.

                          I have to say, I'm surprised that Inzl Kett would let herself get taken down the path like that. "Eretz Israel" means "the land of Israel", not "entire Israel."

                          Comment


                          • Here's the thread where you can link to that sort of stuff, Brabrie. You bring this up fondly all the time, but you never deliver.
                            Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                            E≈mc2
                            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                            -Bob B.

                            Comment


                            • So when are you going to show us that math, Stipe? C'mon. Be a man, and let us see what your math says.

                              Or admit you made it up to impress us.

                              Comment


                              • You've got nothing again I see. Brabrarian.
                                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                                E≈mc2
                                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                                -Bob B.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X