Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Terri Case - this is ridiculous

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Terri Case - this is ridiculous

    Tensions run high among supporters on both sides of the Terri Schiavo case.
    From CNN.com

    This is ridiculous. This friggin' case has become the most retarded media circus I ever saw. This is a private family matter that the whole country and court system does not need to be involved in. This is a waste of the judges' time. Waste of the president's time. And poor Terri! She had a living will and her husband has authority.

    This crap will never end. And our media will continue to find stupid things to tell us and waste our time with. And Terri's parents are just sick, sick people. Let the poor woman die with dignity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I tried to avoid the story as long as I could because it's not my business; this family's issue is not my business and it doesn't belong in the nation's courts! This burns me up.

  • #2
    Originally posted by The Edge
    From CNN.com

    This is ridiculous. This friggin' case has become the most retarded media circus I ever saw. This is a private family matter that the whole country and court system does not need to be involved in. This is a waste of the judges' time. Waste of the president's time. And poor Terri! She had a living will and her husband has authority.

    This crap will never end. And our media will continue to find stupid things to tell us and waste our time with. And Terri's parents are just sick, sick people.

    This burns me up.
    She has a living will? Where? The husband has no authority once he, and soon after Terry collapsed, had another woman thereby committing adultry. We can see plainly what his vows meant to him.

    And to say the parents are sick sick people, just shows your ignorance in this matter.
    The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

    Comment


    • #3
      My ignornace becuase I distance myself from the "news that doesn't need to be in the news"

      I should have no knowledge of the case at all!!!! It's a private, family matter!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's my point.

      Comment


      • #4
        and i have every right to say her parents are sick for making their child go through 17 years of misery and force her husband to grieve so long. he's been through enough.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by The Edge
          My ignornace becuase I distance myself from the "news that doesn't need to be in the news"

          I should have no knowledge of the case at all!!!! It's a private, family matter!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's my point.
          It becomes Public when the no good husband is trying to kill her. Your point is not taken.
          The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

          Comment


          • #6
            BChristianK is right on the money here.

            From the act now to save Terri's life thread

            It appears that Judicial tyranny has triumphed over the will of the people and the constitutional right of a woman, depriving her of her fundamental right to life without the due process of law.

            Terry Shiavo has committed no crime, she has not been found guilty of any crime that would warrant the sentence of death. There is no document that explicitly communicates Terry Shiavo’s desire in her current condition. The only evidence introduced was the hearsay testimony of a man whose dedication can be measured by the fact that he is now shacking up with another women with whom he has children.

            The fact that he stands to gain financially from her death has been ignored. The fact that there is affidavit evidence from those who have had conversations with Michael Shiavo saying that he in fact did not know what Terry’s wishes would be in her current situation have been ignored.

            The testimony of Dr. Cheshire from the Mayo Clinic that Terry Shiavo is not in a persistent vegetative state has been ignored.

            And a judicial tyranny of only 9 people has ignored a bill passed by congress and signed into law by the President of the United States.

            A few men have overridden the will of the people and their elected officials in order to ensure that Michael Shiavo has the pleasure of seeing Terry Shiavo starve to death.

            If an unjust judge can ignore congress and the President and then mock the chief executive of a state by tying his hands all for the purpose of depriving a woman of her constitutionally protected right to life on the hearsay testimony of an adulterer, then we have come to a time when the bill of rights is nothing more than a relic in a museum and the rule of law is governed by the predilections and judgment of a few judicial tyrants; then this is the end of more than Terry Shiavo’s hopes.
            The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

            Comment


            • #7
              So before you insert your foot in your mouth Edge, get the facts. Cause by your logic, the Nazi's would have loved you in Germany and they love you here.
              The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

              Comment


              • #8
                And I expect you to apologize to Terri's parents.
                The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

                Comment


                • #9
                  So it's okay to help someone kill themselves? You are supporting assisted suicide.
                  Writhe in the cruel bloom

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    This is what Christianity has become folks. It's up to us to get it back. I call for a national boycott of National Right to Life being it seems thier judgements are convoluted and compromising.
                    The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by drbrumley
                      This is what Christianity has become folks. It's up to us to get it back. I call for a national boycott of National Right to Life being it seems thier judgements are convoluted and compromising.




                      I concur; National Right to Life is horrible... they compromise on Do Not Murder
                      Writhe in the cruel bloom

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        If Terri had a living will agreement with her husband, why did he wait 7 years after she fell ill to mention it?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Cause she didnt for starters, and even if she did, you still dont kill her
                          The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            It makes no deference at all what anyone, even Terry Shiavo herself, thinks or has given permission too. Assisted suicide is wrong. Killing the innocent is murder. No one has the right to kill the innocent. Not even the courts. I have seen hundreds if not thousands of people who were for some tragic reason unable to care for themselves. Their families were to say the least, devastated but supported the life that was there because that life belonged to the one who possessed it and they defended that life through many hardships. They did not take it. The right to life movement has terned into the the Right to death movement. They are saying that Terry Shiavo has a right to have court assisted suicide. Think about it If you are in a condition of not being able to speak for yourself then the court has the right to sentence you to death upon request. Weather they put a needle in you arm or starve you to death, the outcome is the same. It is a death sentence. It is murder made legal. Hitler had nothing on this God forsaken country!
                            Galatians 5:13 ¶For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.

                            The borrower is slave to the linder. What makes this country think it is rich and free?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by drbrumley
                              Cause she didnt for starters

                              Exactly!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X