Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[Christian Liberty]

Would you think any polygamist figure in the Bible would not be heterosexual if he enjoyed 2 or more of his wives together?

Well, I sort of doubt that they had their wives have sex with each other.

But no, I don't think that enjoying lesbian porn makes one gay. I do find it weird, however. (I also don't watch any porn.)

[Arthur Brain]

Thanks for letting the world know Art that an act of homosexuality turns you on.

As it does a myriad heterosexual men where it comes to beautiful women. I've no problem being honest about it.

We're not talking about viewing a heterosexual act Art, we're talking about a homosexual act where the participants are homosexual females.

Which doesn't in any way shape or form equate to a heterosexual man being homosexual because he isn't repulsed by it. The only way you could level either bi or homosexuality at anyone is if they are attracted to their own gender. Why the bleedin' obvious has to be repeatedly explained to you is bizarre...

Call it what you want, but I call anyone that gets excited about such a thing a freak.

Funny, that pretty much sums up my view on supposedly heterosexual blokes who are utterly obsessed with homosexuality and continually link to graphic gay content including pics of practically naked men...

[noguru]

Since you're here noguru, perhaps you could respond to Naz's post about how you feel about the regulation of homosexual behavior by governments and courts (for you Libertarians out there, that means criminalizing it).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...&postcount=804

In public, yes. In private, no. I agree about the absurdity of that cyber flyer which was posted (I think by you) earlier.

[resurrected]

And for what its worth, I was in the Adirondacks last week....

maybe there's hope for you yet



wait a tic

you weren't driving on the northway, were you?

and i assume you only visited private residences while you were inside the blue line

[Arthur Brain]

A freak? Maybe.

A homosexual? Not exactly.



I beg to differ. I don't see being a cop as something to be proud of, but I do see it as a very logical explanation of WHY the individual in question is an authoritarian fascist.

His character is consistent with policing, and not consistent with any free market job. You know, jobs that people actually CHOOSE to pay for.

Well if he is/was a cop they obviously don't have much of a vetting process in order to get into the force. It may also (if aCW is to be believed regarding the crime rate in Seattle) explain why it's so bad because he makes Chief Wiggum look like Inspector Morse...

[noguru]

Well, I sort of doubt that they had their wives have sex with each other.

I meant threesomes+ of the husband and two or more of the wives. And if it did occur I think it was there business and no one else's.

But no, I don't think that enjoying lesbian porn makes one gay. I do find it weird, however. (I also don't watch any porn.)

Yes and I think anal sex between 2 heterosexuals is weird, but there are many I have met (in one on one hetero relationships) that felt it was acceptable.

I have not watched porn in 20 years. Although growing up in the 60s and 70s it was quite a common thing to see porno magazines (usually soft porn like Playboy but sometimes a little more hardcore like Penthouse) at the house of school friends. I think even main stream society has been inundated by the same level of porn in recent years. Some of the ads I see on South Beach, and a lot of fashion magazines, are no less sexually revealing than what was considered porn when I was a child. Let's face it, laissez faire capitalists have caught on with the idea that sex sells product for them.

[noguru]

Well if he is/was a cop they obviously don't have much of a vetting process in order to get into the force. It may also (if aCW is to be believed regarding the crime rate in Seattle) explain why it's so bad because he makes Chief Wiggum look like Inspector Morse...

He is more like Barney Fife, or Peter Sellers in "The Pink Panther".

[Christian Liberty]

I meant threesomes+ of the husband and two or more of the wives. And if it did occur I think it was there business and no one else's.

Yes, its obviously not anyone else's business.

[GFR7]

Do you need a change of panties GFR7?

I took care of that myself.

***Please see:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...=1#post3978197

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Since you're here noguru, perhaps you could respond to Naz's post about how you feel about the regulation of homosexual behavior by governments and courts (for you Libertarians out there, that means criminalizing it).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...&postcount=804

In public, yes.

Unless it's done at a gay pride parade or a homosexual festival like the Folsom Street Fair, it's already illegal (the crime is called "lewd act in a public place").

In private, no.

Where do you think HIV/AIDS, gonorrhea, syphilis and a whole bunch of words that are sexually transmitted diseases common amongst homosexuals, words that I can't pronounce let alone spell are contracted at nog?

(I'll give you a hint, in the privacy of someone's sodomy chamber).

[GFR7]

For what its worth, as a heterosexual, I don't find the idea of two people of the same gender doing anything sexual to be attractive, even if its two women. Let's just leave it at that.



Could I please ask that you not use that name? You may be under the impression that it is an old-username, but it is not. aCW started calling me "Junior" to make fun of me. Just saying.

1. Could not agree more.
2. Sorry, I couldn't recall your proper name.

[Arthur Brain]

He is more like Barney Fife, or Peter Sellers in "The Pink Panther".

Hmm, I think I may have just found some cctv footage of 'Officer aCW' in action...

[Christian Liberty]

1. Could not agree more.
2. Sorry, I couldn't recall your proper name.

I never posted my proper name to my knowledge. My username works. CL works as well.

[noguru]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Since you're here noguru, perhaps you could respond to Naz's post about how you feel about the regulation of homosexual behavior by governments and courts (for you Libertarians out there, that means criminalizing it).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...&postcount=804


Unless it's done at a gay pride parade or a homosexual festival like the Folsom Street Fair, it's already illegal (the crime is called "lewd act in a public place").

It should be illegal at a parade in public as well.

[GFR7]

I'm mostly messing around because a bunch of people here have said that they think aCW is lying/bragging about being a retired cop. Seeing as I have a low opinion of police in general (I could share why in another thread, or in PM) I kind of find it a fun thing to use as an insult

Actually, I had never heard him claim to have been a cop. I really just find all his "move on" and orders to stay off his threads - while he feels complete freedom to go on the threads of those he commands - to be cop-like. And no, it is not a compliment, although my brother-in-law is a Homicide and Major Crimes Lieutenant, whom I admire.