Nang's SPOTD is Tet's Hit Out of the Park!

Status
Not open for further replies.

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
As we see, none of the John Nelson Darby followers can address the Royal Priesthood of believers.
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
Nope, you're wrong.

Start at Luke 1, and take note of how many times Christ Jesus uses the phrase "this generation" before you get to Luke 21:32

Each time "this generation" is used by Christ Jesus, He is specifically referring to the generation of Jewish contemporaries of His.

Read the entire chapter! Yikes man, you sound slow in the noggin?
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
TeT, wish I could sit across the table from you? First, I'd arm wrestle you then,
after you recover, we'd have a nice debate on some very interesting subjects!
 

musterion

Well-known member
Oh, almost forgot. Hum along the theme to GOLDFINGER for this one.

Bull-in-ger
he's the man
the man with the Darby touch
no, Crowley's touch
no, maybe Blavatsky's touch, sorry I can't keep the lies straight
but someone's touch

Such a cold finger
beckons you to enter
his web of historical-grammatical method-based sin
but don't go in!

Golden words he will pour in your ear
but his lies can't disguise what you fear
for a dispie kid is sold when he knows that
the N.C.'s not for us, all thanks to
Bull-in-ger

etc

going to bed
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
No, I'm pretty used to it.

Anytime I want to be called all kinds of names by a Dispensationalist, all I have to do is bring up John Nelson Darby.

Nothing sets a Dispensationalist into a rage, like John Nelson Darby does.

666 of the last 800 "posts"(loosely employed) of his contain "Darby."

Ssssssssssssssssss..

TOL laughs at you, Corky. Poor Mrs. Corky...with your obsession.
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
As we see, none of the John Nelson Darby followers can address the Royal Priesthood of believers.


Show us the "evidence," chapter, and verse, that "argues," as you do, that members of the body of Christ are not not to be taught by other members of the body of Christ, whether that member teacher be dead(i. e., via his/her writings),or alive.

Craigie: 3= years of silence.

"Softball" for you Craigie, since you cannot handle my "heater:"


Show us the "evidence," chapter, and verse, that "argues," as you do, that members of the body of Christ are not not to be taught by other members of the body of Christ, such as John N. Darby.
 
Last edited:

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
1 Peter 3:15---"But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and
be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh
you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:"
 

Nang

TOL Subscriber
"I already answered it."-Tet.


Answer this:

I deny that the New Covenant is in place/inaugurated right now, Craigie, in this dispensation of the grace of God. As I've asked you, over, and over:

Am I saved?

No one should declare you to be reprobate, but as long as you deny new covenant, you deny what Christ achieved for His church, and you remain condemned under the old Covenant of Works/Law.

It is impossible to be gifted with saving faith in Jesus Christ's redemption and forgiveness, and deny being under the New Covenant.
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
No one should declare you to be reprobate, but as long as you deny new covenant, you deny what Christ achieved for His church, and you remain condemned under the old Covenant of Works/Law.

It is impossible to be gifted with saving faith in Jesus Christ's redemption and forgiveness, and deny being under the New Covenant.

Whatever you want to call it but, once one has heard the Grace
Message, and placed their faith in Christ, then sealed and
baptized into the Body of Christ, they are then, a Child of God!
Would you agree Nang?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top