No, clearly the Romans and Pilate were more than capable of dealing with any uppity locals. Appeasing the locals just wasn't something the Romans did. Crucifixion was how they routinely dealt with anyone who was causing them problems and it showed that they meant business.
That's not what tradition states.
Anyway now you seem to agree that the Jews, who could have had him set free, and not the Romans, were the ones who wanted Jesus killed. I can be so persuasive.
I said from the get go that it was the Jews who wanted him dead, and have the greater sin. It was the central point- how you got that confused is beyond me.
Ah the good old days when guys could love 'em and leave 'em.
And now, women do that to men every day, and if a man brings it up, he's mocked. It's called 'insanity', and that's what you all are walking masses of.
In the event of pregnancy, it is a prospect to women and a terror to men who, without the leeway and support system a woman has, must struggle and hope that she doesn't bury her heel into her neck.
Yeah, the 'good ol days', when people such as yourself were called crooks.
Yeah let's blame women for everything, we guys need scapegoats right? And it's so Biblical too.
The Bible puts a lot of emphasis on the sin of Eve and a societal need of patriarchy for obvious good reason- a reason that you can't see because you are incapable of realizing how warped feminized society is.
It seems to me that this isn't about anyone's desire to kill fetuses but is about having the right to rationally choose based on one's own particular circumstances and moral compass, and not those of someone else.
lain:
If a would-be father forces an abortion on his sexual partner, you would see this as some screwed up crime, even though it is very much his child as well.
That's because when it boils down to it, you've been trained to simply give women supremacy in any conflict of interest.
