No, the definition of science has not changed.
They make claims based on many assumptions. Don't confuse that with real science (knowledge).
Job did not have the means to do so at that time. Don't confuse that with something eternally unknowable.
You're the one that quit the conversation.
So who is it that has the authority to define what the "valid" definition of science is, and why have so many school teachers and college professors and textbooks gotten it wrong all these years?
That's a very debatable topic.
Then their calculations were worthless.
I would think scripture is real knowledge.
So you think that was just concerning the one man, Job, and some other man could?
Apparently.
Thanks.
I'm not distracting from it.
No argument there.
It is, but it does not give all details about the physical world.
The ones that start with God's word.
You've completely missed the point. Job or any other man AT THAT TIME could not do what we can do today. For example, get in an airplane and circle the globe.
Once again... AT THAT TIME.
Sure it does. It often talks about sun rise and sun set.... those to NOT happen in the "flat earth model".
This type of appeal to authority is a fallacy.
Not true.
No.
Like I've said in a previous post. It's not about piling up evidence on two sides of a scale and seeing which way it tilts. There is come incontrovertible evidence that show that the earth is not flat.
It indicates that it is because no man was there in the beginning.
That an object can rise and fall above the earth does not prove a globe earth.
Appealing to "science" as authority would also be a fallacy then.
Sure it is.
Igor Baliukin of Russia's Space Research Institute says yes.
Because cities don't move closer or further apart, and thus the distance would be the same no matter which model is used.
So you think that God will not allow us to measure our world?
Sun set shows that the sun goes below the horizon. That is not what the "flat earth model" says.
According to "flat earther's", it does not go below the horizon. It's not my opinion, it's what they say.
And?
A bunch of Hebrew language experts does not determine the shape of the earth.
Their "experiments" do not prove a flat earth.
That's because some things are harder to prove than others.
That does not make any sense.
Irrelevant to the question above.
Just showing what scripture says.
Does scripture say the sun goes below the horizon?
Just pointing it out.
They do verify what scripture says about the earth.
Their experiments show no curvature.
No doubt.
Cities don't move closer or further apart, they stay where they are.
Someone may have hypothesized that is a "true" map.
Why?
I know what scripture says, you're claiming what it means. I disagree with what you think that it means and not what it says.
What does sun SET mean?
That's debatable.
The "experiments" are not valid... sorry.
Once again, you are not making any sense. Nobody is claiming that the cites move.
Do you have a better map? That is the "flat earth map".
We move with the planet. So does everything that sits on the surface of the earth.