White Lives Matter

MrDante

New member
Libs need to calm down, they're making our Nation look bad to the rest of the world. Libs must accept that President Trump will be our leader for, at least 4 more years.

Mark 3:25 "And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand." A philosophy that, transcends all dispensations.


They are just showing all they learned from conservatives over the last 8 years.

NMP.png
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
You need to work on your WIT my dear fellow.
Like having your grammar critiqued by a parrot. Or, to borrow and alter, your speech exceeds your grasp.

You must not have been blessed with it, at birth.
Which brings me half way to your total.

The reason I say that is, your WIT doesn't flow naturally and seems forced.
It's odd how the people who say that to me are always on the pointed end of it, where the people who don't are usually chuckling over it.


TH, it appears as if you and I are not "Politically aligned."
I'm a moderate, registered Republican who strongly opposed our current president. So the chances are we're divided on some things of importance and in agreement on others.

That's why we seem to be at odds with one another.
No, we're at odds because I took a fairly mild exception to a point of yours a while back and you turned oddly hostile then declared me null and ignored. After that I decided to answer insult with barb.
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
I would gather, either nothing, or its understandable.
Not to anyone who reads first and answers second.

And what do you have to say about the racism against whites?
Unsurprisingly, exactly the same thing I'd say about racism regardless. It's an evil thing that begets evil actions. And it doesn't belong among us. Supra.

I believe that's where CS decided the important thing to talk about was "supra". :plain:
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
Like having your grammar critiqued by a parrot. Or, to borrow and alter, your speech exceeds your grasp.


Which brings me half way to your total.


It's odd how the people who say that to me are always on the pointed end of it, where the people who don't are usually chuckling over it.



I'm a moderate, registered Republican who strongly opposed our current president. So the chances are we're divided on some things of importance and in agreement on others.

No, we're at odds because I took a fairly mild exception to a point of yours a while back and you turned oddly hostile then declared me null and ignored. After that I decided to answer insult with barb.

Either way, I find you, rather annoying and pretentious. Your ego gets in the way of your common sense.
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
Here you go. I was off by two decades. It looks like around the mid 1940's that African-Americans started to lean more Democratic. It wasn't until the 1960's that African-Americans voted havily Democratic. But my overall point stands. African-Americans didn't always vote overwhelmingly Democratic like they do today.

When did black Americans start voting so heavily Democratic?

Why not check out your sources before making a "supposed" truthful statement?
 

The Berean

Well-known member
Why not check out your sources before making a "supposed" truthful statement?

I will next time. :up: I think I poorly worded my intial post. The gap between GOP and Democratic support by African-Americans became large in the 1960's but it started in the mid 1940's.
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
See: the odd coincidence relating to how you value wit. I can understand how that would be annoying.

I think you bruise easily for someone who likes to jab.

Well, that's just one man's opinion. As they say, "We all have one." Frankly, your opinion and $5.00 will purchase a half way decent cup of coffee.
 

Yorzhik

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Not always. Black people were mostly Republicans until the late 1960s.

Sent from my SM-G920V using TheologyOnline mobile app
No. They were more Democrat during the Roosevelt socialist push in the 30s. Then they were about equal as Repubican and Democrat until they permanently got on the Democrat plantation for Johnson's socialist Great Society in the middle 60s.
View attachment 25288
source

Eee gads. My first post back on TOL and The Berean had already corrected it. Nevermind. Sheesh.
 

The Berean

Well-known member
No. They were more Democrat during the Roosevelt socialist push in the 30s. Then they were about equal as Repubican and Democrat until they permanently got on the Democrat plantation for Johnson's socialist Great Society in the middle 60s.
View attachment 25288
source

Eee gads. My first post back on TOL and The Berean had already corrected it. Nevermind. Sheesh.

NO worries Yorzhik. :chuckle:

In 1960 Jackie Robinson famously supported Richard Nixon. Robinson personally knew Nixon and had long talks with him about the racial issues in America. Robinson also met JFK and was not impressed by him. Robinson wrote in his 1972 autobiography that he was shocked that a major political candidate like JFK was completely clueless of the racial problems in America. Robinson later regretted supporting Nixon because he felt Nixon sold out to the Republican estamblishment and turned their back on African-Americans.
 

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
No. They were more Democrat during the Roosevelt socialist push in the 30s. Then they were about equal as Repubican and Democrat until they permanently got on the Democrat plantation for Johnson's socialist Great Society in the middle 60s.
View attachment 25288
source

Eee gads. My first post back on TOL and The Berean had already corrected it. Nevermind. Sheesh.
:wave2:
We're glad you're here anyway!
 

Alate_One

Well-known member
Darwin tried that, he was a total racist.
Darwin was a product of his time which was inherently racist. However, he was relatively forward thinking for the age accepting that all humans had a common origin. Many people at the time thought each race was a separate creative or evolutionary event (some still think this in Europe especially).

But evolution as we understand it today isn't predicated on one man's ideas 150 years ago. Evolution is a scientific idea, not religion, and so it changes to fit the data when more data is available. Darwin did not have data on genetics.
 

Alate_One

Well-known member
So that kind of racism is ok. Is that how you libs are setting up your own racism against white people?
Are you able to read? Because someone's a product of their time doesn't mean it's okay. But it is understandable. The racism in this thread is current, when we have plenty of available information to show how scientifically incorrect it is. Yet, here you are asserting that equality means racism against white people.
 
Top