User Tag List

Page 2 of 25 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 374

Thread: Bob Enyart's "The Plot" is he right?

  1. #16
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    472
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    499
    Quote Originally Posted by way 2 go View Post
    I agree

    bottom of page

    " Jesus himself preached grace"

    Jesus never said the word grace
    1. What is your definition of the word "grace"?

    2. While Jesus Himself is not directly quoted in the gospels as using the word "grace", we still find this in the gospel of John:

    John 1:14, 1:16
    And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth...And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.

  2. #17
    Over 1500 post club Vaquero45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,615
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 48 Times in 45 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    315822
    Quote Originally Posted by way 2 go View Post
    I agree

    bottom of page

    " Jesus himself preached grace"

    Jesus never said the word grace
    Have to allow for Luke 4:22, Jesus with "gracious words", which is not at all opposed to the mid-Acts view to my knowledge, or the way Bob views salvation I think, but it surely suggests Jesus spoke of grace. I don't know anyone who would deny grace is involved in salvation in any dispensation. If anyone is saved at all, grace is involved.
    Marge: "Aren't you going to give him the last rites?"
    Rev. Lovejoy: "That's Catholic, Marge - you might as well ask me to do a voodoo dance."



    "Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered the next round.

    Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin

  3. #18
    Black Rifles Matter Nick M's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13,864
    Thanks
    339
    Thanked 3,829 Times in 2,461 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147747
    So Paulos is teaching that Jesus taught grace and didn't teach grace at the same time you have to earn salvation. Got it.
    Last edited by Nick M; March 3rd, 2013 at 08:09 AM. Reason: rebuke removed so he suffers
    Jesus saves completely. http://www.climatedepot.com/ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

    Titus 1

    For there are many insubordinate, both idle talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, whose mouths must be stopped

    Ephesians 5

    11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret

  4. #19
    Over 750 post club Doormat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    In a temple made without hands.
    Posts
    719
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by way 2 go View Post
    can you show how your exegesis is correct
    and that Mid Acts Disp exegesis is wrong ?
    We had a good discussion not too long ago about the idea of "two gospels" being error. You can read it here: Rightly dividing the Word of Truth.
    So they took him and killed him, and threw him out of the vineyard.

  5. #20
    Over 750 post club Doormat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    In a temple made without hands.
    Posts
    719
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by way 2 go View Post
    Jesus never said the word grace
    John 1:17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
    So they took him and killed him, and threw him out of the vineyard.

  6. #21
    Over 3000 post club
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    3,003
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 161 Times in 123 Posts

    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    131120
    [QUOTE=Paulos;3373866]1. What is your definition of the word "grace"?
    /QUOTE]


    Hi , and the word CHARIS /GRACE is translated 12 different ways , like .

    Grace , Thanks , Trankful , Benefit , Trustworthly are just a few !!

    There is a difference between GRACE and the DISPENSATION of GRACE as explained by Paul !!

    dan p

  7. #22
    Welcome to the Underneath Lighthouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Anderson, IN
    Posts
    19,774
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked 10,670 Times in 8,588 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    570680
    Quote Originally Posted by Paulos View Post
    Here are some other points of view:

    The Church is both the body and the bride of Christ
    I'd like for those who keep saying this to show the phrase "Bride of Christ" in the Bible. Then to show Paul using it, as well as anyone other than Paul using the phrase "Body of Christ."


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Lighthouse For Your Post:

    Tambora (April 26th, 2016)

  9. #23
    Black Rifles Matter Nick M's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13,864
    Thanks
    339
    Thanked 3,829 Times in 2,461 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147747
    Quote Originally Posted by Doormat View Post
    John 1:17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
    That is John, not the Lord. And he is speaking of the Lord, ex post facto.
    Jesus saves completely. http://www.climatedepot.com/ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

    Titus 1

    For there are many insubordinate, both idle talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, whose mouths must be stopped

    Ephesians 5

    11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret

  10. #24
    Over 1000 post club way 2 go's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,200
    Thanks
    257
    Thanked 170 Times in 134 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    175874
    Quote Originally Posted by Doormat View Post
    We had a good discussion not too long ago about the idea of "two gospels" being error. You can read it here: Rightly dividing the Word of Truth.
    did it show your exegesis

    and settle doctrinal debates like:

    are believers under the law?
    is baptism necessary ?
    does salvation by faith require works ?
    can believers lose their salvation ?
    must believers keep the sabbath ?
    is the rapture before the tribulation ?
    is there a rapture ?

    this exegesis works
    circumcised= Jew under the law
    uncircumcised= body of Christ

  11. #25
    WWDD? musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,335
    Thanks
    848
    Thanked 3,724 Times in 2,246 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147639
    can you show how your exegesis is correct
    and that Mid Acts Disp exegesis is wrong ?
    All I can add to what's been said is exactly what's already been said - you won't get one. They'll CLAIM it's one, but it won't be. Never is. I've looked.

    And mind you, this is coming from an ex-independent fundamental Baptist, which is about as close to a hard-core doctrinal bulldog as you can get these days. A friendly, patient MAD gave me THINGS THAT DIFFER and challenged me to refute it, to bleed red ink on it. I tried, for months. Threw the book against the wall once, it made me so angry. And then...here I am.

    So what you WILL find is that those who simply cannot/will not see the revelation of the mystery for ALL that it means are quite happy with a doctrinal Mexican standoff. They'll put up strawmen and SWEAR you built them, gainsay whatever you say, ignore any number of holes you blow in their position, ignore direct questions they can't answer and pretend you never asked them, and keep repeating their same old points over and over again until one of you gets bored and disgusted and quits. Then! they usually have the unmitigated audacity to claim victory. That's why I left TOL a few years back.

    BTW...some college kid a few years back supposedly wrote the end-all, be-all refutation of Joel Finck's THE MYSTERY. I have not seen it but heard it was hardly that. Point is, it's one of the few true attempts to take on MAD head-on and like the rest, it fails.

    If anyone here wants to know just how rock solid MAD is, there is NO HUMAN BOOK ON EARTH I can recommend more highly than Stam's THE CONTROVERSY (now retitled HOLDING FAST THE FAITHFUL WORD). Why this one? Because it shows several doctrinal exchanges Stam had with some truly historic, recognizable names of 20th century Christianity...Ironside, DeHaan, Steadman, Rice and others. Each and every one of these cats got trounced but the book is worth buying to see just how arrogant, duplicitous and downright NASTY some of them really got back in the day when MAD was in the ascendency and a threat to water baptism (which is exactly what it amounted to for the opposers). Way2Go, if you don't have this book but are interested and promise to read it (if you haven't already) I may have a spare copy. PM me if interested.

    Good night to all...

  12. #26
    Gold level Subscriber heir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colossians 3:3 KJV
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks
    3,819
    Thanked 3,489 Times in 2,103 Posts

    Blog Entries
    7
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147681
    Quote Originally Posted by Doormat View Post
    We had a good discussion not too long ago about the idea of "two gospels" being error.
    Right, because there are more than two gospels in the Bible.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to heir For Your Post:

    Grosnick Marowbe (April 28th, 2016),Tambora (May 1st, 2016)

  14. #27
    Over 1000 post club way 2 go's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,200
    Thanks
    257
    Thanked 170 Times in 134 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    175874
    Stam's THE CONTROVERSY I may have a spare copy. PM me if interested.
    found .pdf online

    link

    thanks for the book title

    So what you WILL find is that those who simply cannot/will not see the revelation of the mystery for ALL that it means are quite happy with a doctrinal Mexican standoff. They'll put up strawmen and SWEAR you built them, gainsay whatever you say, ignore any number of holes you blow in their position, ignore direct questions they can't answer and pretend you never asked them, and keep repeating their same old points over and over again until one of you gets bored and disgusted and quits. Then! they usually have the unmitigated audacity to claim victory
    that is describing godrulz and others

  15. #28
    Over 1000 post club way 2 go's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,200
    Thanks
    257
    Thanked 170 Times in 134 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    175874
    musterion
    Slogan/motto:
    Christ + nothing else = salvation. Christ + anything else = Lake of Fire.
    i wouldn't say a christian that believes he has to keep the law is going to the Lake of Fire

  16. #29
    WWDD? musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,335
    Thanks
    848
    Thanked 3,724 Times in 2,246 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147639
    Quote Originally Posted by way 2 go View Post
    i wouldn't say a christian that believes he has to keep the law is going to the Lake of Fire
    If a professing Christian is keeping any aspect of the Law (to which he died in Christ!) in order to keep himself saved, stay saved, prove he's saved or to be sanctified, then at the very least he has believed a false gospel of works. He or she may have truly believed the Gospel and so are regenerated and eternally secure in Christ, but is now walking not by faith but by the flesh and is on the path to self-righteousness. He or she needs to repent of it, per Paul's rebuke to the Galatians. In most cases though, I fear it is the sign of a devout, religious, sincere unbeliever who has been deceived and has never been saved - the sign of a member of Christendom but not of Christ - for if we are saved or sanctified by keeping any aspect of the Law then Christ died for nothing, yes?

  17. #30
    WWDD? musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,335
    Thanks
    848
    Thanked 3,724 Times in 2,246 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147639
    Quote Originally Posted by way 2 go View Post
    found .pdf online

    link

    thanks for the book title



    that is describing godrulz and others
    Yep, one of the people who went on my block list, quick.

    Glad you found the book. Take time to read it, it's truly fascinating and will shed light on much.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us