User Tag List

Page 52 of 52 FirstFirst ... 24249505152
Results 766 to 770 of 770

Thread: Battle Royale VII Specific discussion thread

  1. #766
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Bob,

    I hope I have read that wrong and you are not terminally ill.

    If it is the case you have my warmest best wishes and I hope you and your family are not suffering unduly.

    It brings home some of the reality of what I say here sometimes means little in the face of reality.

    Regardless of my own personal opinions.. if your faith gives you and your family comfort then it is a damn good thing.

  2. #767
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Hawkings' atheistic universe argument

    I found this forum today, and I don't really understand where to post things but here it goes:

    The Theist guy said:
    "I can find a word for something popping into existence from nothing: magic. Magic is not real. And an atheist with a pre-suppositional bias against a supernatural origin of the natural universe must contradict at least one of the first two laws, and so, Stephen does. Hawkings is wrong."

    This is very much a false statement. Quantum physics predicts that particle/anti-particle pairs come into existence spontaneously. This has been tested by experiment and shown to be true. When things are at quantum and plank lengths you can't use standard forms of logic or reasoning. Existence and non-existence are not well defined concepts until the quantum system is disrupted by a classical system, ie. measured. As the universe canít be measured outside itself, by definition, since it is all that there is. Hence, its existence on that scale becomes a difficult question to deal with in its own right. As Hawkings said, time itself is part of the universe. If the universe is point sized time does not process. If time does not process does the universe exist? How could we know it exists if it requires time to observe the universe to measure its existence? If something can't be measured to exist then the discrete distinction between existence and non-existence is meaningless.

    ( Bahh, rubbish, you say, but take 4 years of undergraduate physics and then come back and talk. One shouldnít discount things because they superficially make no sense. )

    So I guess one could say that the universe was in this very much non-classical, semi-existent (but most likely physically tractable) state until it got large enough for time and existence to have some meaning. Then it existed. When physical systems scale to different rules, ie. Plank weirdness -> quantum -> semi-classical- > classical they do so smoothly. So one can not even say at what point the universe did in fact exist, and what point where existence had no meaning.


    A non-quantum argument that addresses this problem:
    The universe is defined as the set of all that exists. Anything that is not in this set does not exist. Does this set exist? The universe canít include itself. Hence the universe does not exist. This is a classic paradox of logic. We see again that discussing the existence, non-existence, especially in the creation of the universe is on a deep level a flawed question. The vary notion of existence is so intimately tied to the concept of the universe that it can not be applied to the universe in a meaningful way.

  3. #768
    Over 750 post club Flipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    815
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2376
    I think that would be Planck, as in Max.

    Otherwise, a typical Plank length is 4 feet and you won't be able to get a lot of the quantum subtlety at such a scale

  4. #769
    Friendly Neighborhood Admin Turbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    5,316
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    1038
    leers,

    That was only your second post, and you're already repeating yourself?

  5. #770
    Gold level Subscriber Bob Enyart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    1,109
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 132 Times in 123 Posts

    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    74378

    BR7 Milestone: hit 39,000 views on Jan 16, 2005!

    Battle Royale VII Milestone:

    The number of views for BR7 hit 39,000 on Jan 16, 2006, about 29 months after the debate ended on Aug. 20, 2003!

    -Bob Enyart
    The Bob Enyart Live talk show airs at KGOV.com weekdays at 5 pm E.T. Also, same time, same station, check out Theology Thursday (.com) and on Fridays, Real Science Radio (.com) a.k.a. rsr.org. All shows are available 24/7 and you can call us at at 1-800-8Enyart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us