ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Made ya post :chuckle:
-
This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
Q. What do Christians and Darwinists have in common with one another?
- Thread starter 7djengo7
- Start date
Made ya post :chuckle:
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Again (9th time), is this--
--you defining what (if anything) you mean by "incest"? Yes or No?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Again (10th time), is this--
Why can you not answer this simple, yes-or-no question?
I challenged annabenedetti to try to quote you answering it:
So far, she's failed the challenge, just as you have.
--you defining what (if anything) you mean by "incest"? Yes or No?
Why can you not answer this simple, yes-or-no question?
I challenged annabenedetti to try to quote you answering it:
So far, she's failed the challenge, just as you have.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I haven't even bothered. :chuckle:
Get over yourself and move on. Begging him for answers is kind of unseemly.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Thanks for the admission. That's you admitting to me that you've never found Arthur Brain answering the question I've asked him 10 times. And, by that admission, you further demonstrate that you were lying when you tried to give him moral support in his lying--his saying, falsely, that he'd answered the question I'd asked him. :chuckle:
That's how you characterize what I'm doing? "Begging him for answers"? As usual, your shallowness causes you to be quite mistaken. I obviously wouldn't beg him to do what I know he can't do. I know that he can't answer the question I've asked him. That's the thing, see: now, not only do I know that he can't answer the question, but you know, and he knows, that he can't answer it. People who think they can answer a question do not stonewall against it the way errorists like Arthur Brain and yourself need to stonewall against questions.
Nope. Present evidence showing that what we believe cannot be true. Watch our response. :up:
Nope. I regularly read ideas and explanations from sources that I wholly disagree with.
Thanks! :up:
You know nothing about either. Watch:
What is science?
What is the law?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The evidence has been presented time and time again, by Alate One & Barbarian, people who are completely versed in science. You're that entrenched in your belief that you never listened or even understood. Science itself undoes what you believe to be true. YEC is again, not science.
Oh be honest. You are never going to entertain anything that counters your belief in a young earth.
You're welcome, if you like having your ignorance pointed out so much. That thread of yours where you oh so foolishly tried to take on TH about law when you didn't even have a layman's understanding of the basics was entertaining as anything! :thumb:
Nah, think you need to watch those instead.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
One of your problems, here, is that what you and your fellow Darwin cheerleaders call "evidence" is naught but a combination of falsehood and nonsense. They, and you, have, time and again, presented evidence that you are versed in the falsehood and nonsense you falsely call "science" and "evidence".
It is by listening to your Darwin cheerleading that we have been enabled to understand that the falsehood and nonsense that you Darwin cheerleaders have been calling "science" and "evidence" is falsehood and nonsense, and that it is neither truth, nor science, nor evidence.
How does the falsehood and nonsense you, as a Darwin cheerleader, call "science" undo the truth that is YEC? That's right: the falsehood and nonsense you promulgate does not undo the truth that is YEC. What's always an amusing spectacle, however, is how Darwin cheerleaders such as yourself are constantly undoing yourselves by your own irrational thinking in your performance as Darwin cheerleaders.
Well, YEC definitely is not the falsehood and nonsense you call "science". What YEC is, though, is Bible truth. Which is why Bible-despisers such as yourself and all other Darwin cheerleaders despise YEC.
Since YEC is true, anything that counters YEC is either falsehood or nonsense. Duh. So, if by "entertain", you mean believe, then why would, or should anybody who believes the truth that is YEC stop believing it and start believing the falsehood you believe and preach--the falsehood that counters YEC?
Right Divider
Body part
AB is convinced that man can tell more about the creation by "observing" it than the one that created it can in His Word. And yet AB still describes himself as a "believing Christian". It's stunning.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Man can tell more about God's creation than God can: more falsehood! Arthur Brain, for example, makes it his personal business, day by day, to tell as much falsehood about God and His creation as he can. Like you, and unlike Arthur Brain, I'll stick with the Bible truth that is YEC.
But you won't tell us what it is or what they were responding to. :idunno:
Quite unlike you. You have no idea what it is. You think that because they say it, it is science.
You're that entrenched in your belief that you never listened or even understood. Science itself undoes what you believe to be true.
Nobody said it was, and nor should they. This is another tacit admission that you have no idea what you're talking about.
OK
If you take a declarative statement from me and present evidence that shows it cannot be true, I will shift my belief. :up:
For example, the Earth was created by God about 6,000 years ago.
Go ahead. We have plenty of time. :up:
You have no idea what science or the law are.
Right Divider
Body part
I've tried to discuss some science with AB regarding radiometric dating. Not ONCE did he ever discuss the scientific details. Every single time he ran to a fallacious argument. Typically the appeal to authority or the appeal to popularity. He repeated those over and over and over .....
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh please, they've undermined the nonsense of YEC on here for years.
No, it's because what they're saying is science, not because I think it's science. This is lame even by your standards. Science doesn't undo itself silly, but it does undo non science like YEC/"creation science".
Sounds like someone has his pedantic hat on. "Creation science" is not science.
Barb, Alate and others have shown you how ridiculous YEC is on here for years and you were never going to listen.
You carry on talking to yourself if you want. You are completely clueless...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I haven't described myself as anything and I'm not going to either. There's nothing "stunning" about Christian's accepting actual science and having faith either as plenty have displayed on here.
Right Divider
Body part
So you have a secret belief system?
I accept actual science.... theories about ORIGINS are not the same kind of science that builds computers and skyscrapers.
You have rejected God's OWN description of the events and have instead accepted a man-made idea about it.
Call yourself whatever you want. You appear to be neither a Christian nor a scientist.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, no, I've accepted actual science and I'm not tied to some restrictive belief system that has no room for allegory in it. Rejecting fundamentalism is entirely different. This is why many Christian's have no cognitive dissonance with accepting science and having faith.
Right Divider
Body part
Why do you lie about me again? I leave plenty of "room for allegory". But unlike you, I do not force allegory were it is not there.
It's a bit ironic that you cannot see that you have your own form of fundamentalism that is wrong.
I too have no problem with accepting science and having faith. Real science and not your brand of pseudo-science.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
There's no need for force.
Probably because I don't.
Sure you do because what you accept simply isn't science, it's pseudo bunk that is rightfully derided for the nonsense that it is. You don't accept actual science at all.
Right Divider
Body part
I agree... but you do it anyway.
Adam is ALWAYS spoken of in scripture as an actual MAN and not as an "allegory".
Oh look!!! Allegories having allegories :rotfl:
Of course you do... your fundamentalism includes:
- God's Word cannot be taken seriously.
- Man-made ideas are above God's Word.
- etc. etc. etc.
You can continue to lie. It suits your nature.
"Science" is your "god".