In any trial, there are two sides, the defense and the prosecution. Right? They both have attorneys and they both make their case. In the end a judge or a jury renders a decision.
With me so far?
Imagine a case, where the prosecution decides to run out, get in front of a camera, and holler out his opinion. What would it mean.
Nothing. It would mean nothing. In fact it would taint the whole case
No judgment, no deliberation, no jury, just one side's opinion carries no weight, no meaning... ...nothing.
So, why do we care what Mueller says? He is one side. And should he even be allowed to issue a public report? He is not a judge, and he has no authority to render any decision. HE IS THE PROSECUTOR. HE IS JUST ONE SIDE.
Will the other side - the defense - get to issue a report?
Does anybody here see anything wrong with this whole scenario?
With me so far?
Imagine a case, where the prosecution decides to run out, get in front of a camera, and holler out his opinion. What would it mean.
Nothing. It would mean nothing. In fact it would taint the whole case
No judgment, no deliberation, no jury, just one side's opinion carries no weight, no meaning... ...nothing.
So, why do we care what Mueller says? He is one side. And should he even be allowed to issue a public report? He is not a judge, and he has no authority to render any decision. HE IS THE PROSECUTOR. HE IS JUST ONE SIDE.
Will the other side - the defense - get to issue a report?
Does anybody here see anything wrong with this whole scenario?
