LIberal plows into crowd of liberals in Va

Status
Not open for further replies.

randomvim

New member
The original reason of the rally was to protest the town council's decision to remove the statute of Robert E. Lee.

Those groups that would attend such a protest do not represent "mainstream" America!
that group doesnt need to represent mainstream america. because they do not does not mean they are automatically racists or incorrect/invalid in their arguement.

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk
 

Rusha

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
that group doesnt need to represent mainstream america. because they do not does not mean they are automatically racists or incorrect/invalid in their arguement.

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk

Is this guy with the nazi armband deplorable?

DHHHhzuWAAI-FUc.jpg



We know Trump certainly has not labeled him as such. We also know that one of Trump's base said this ...

“I would recommend you take a good look in the mirror & remember it was White Americans who put you in the presidency, not radical leftists,” David Duke

Why do you suppose he doesn't address Duke ... personally? He has no problem screeching on about Dems, Clinton, Republicans, Obama, China, NK, the news media, celebrities ... the only person and group he hasn't called out is Russia ... and white nationalists.
 

exminister

Well-known member
Lil Jeff has declared the events in Charlottesville don't meet the definition of domestic terrorism.


Under the Patriot Act, person engages in domestic terrorism if their actions are ""dangerous to human life"" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.

If this nutter aimed his vehicle at strangers taking a particular stand against a particular ideology/movement then how is the nutter not fulfilling (i) and meeting the definition? Or is Lil Jeff of the mind that the nutter was after someone he knew for some other reason?

Just another in a growing list of reasons to not take this administration seriously as guardians of the public trust and right.

Edit point: yes, I know the nutter's name.

Just plain incredible but totally expected.
 

exminister

Well-known member
Lil Jeff has declared the events in Charlottesville don't meet the definition of domestic terrorism.


Under the Patriot Act, person engages in domestic terrorism if their actions are ""dangerous to human life"" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.

If this nutter aimed his vehicle at strangers taking a particular stand against a particular ideology/movement then how is the nutter not fulfilling (i) and meeting the definition? Or is Lil Jeff of the mind that the nutter was after someone he knew for some other reason?

Just another in a growing list of reasons to not take this administration seriously as guardians of the public trust and right.

Edit point: yes, I know the nutter's name.

Has he changed his mind?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/14/us/politics/domestic-terrorism-sessions.html
 

randomvim

New member
No, the murderer was specifically attending the Unite the Right rally, according to his mother. And there are photos of him holding placards at a far-right rally. He was definitely a far right supporter, Republican voter and Trump supporter. That doesn't tar the rest of Republicans, but it is what it is.
as another poster describes, the protest dealt with removal of a u.s. monument to robert e lee. that is not a rally to unite and that is not automatically a far right event.

again, i notioned to understanding political platform. socialism is not " political right or far right." therefor there are multiple groups and peoples at the rallies. and there are at both sides of this arguement.

yes there were racists at rally of that day, but there were others who did not stand with white supremists though believing the statue should stay.

and in the neo nazi groups and kkk there may be those who out right disgust the actions of the individual they happened to been standing next to.

the video showing the collision was shot by a white woman who was being yelled at for being a bigot prior to that incident. she walked away from a group that wanted to force her out.

there were many people of different ideals present. some just recording events as they occured.


Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk
 

randomvim

New member
Are you following this conversation at all? You seem rather detached from the normal logic of a thread.
this is a good point to follow for someone taking a neutral position on the matter. news isnt aleays correct.

my news stationed showed a man being beaten by a group wearing all black and claiming he was attacked by nationalists. this was their part to say how racism has grown in U.S. however. the full video on youtube shows that the men were actually antifa .. a group of socialists and anarchists.

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk
 

randomvim

New member
Ah, yes, the broad brush. Make it all look the same, and you can call it a wash.

How does that balance look when one of the Nazis drives a car into a crowd? Was that self-defense? What balances that out?
Violence is not balanced. it progresses and continues to foster more violence that is extended beyond past violent act.

This shouldnt make us abscent minded to idiocy and wrong doing by all groups. We should not refrain ourselves from criticising more than just the white nationalists.

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk
 

randomvim

New member
Not to mention that message boards aren't how people are connecting and communicating in great numbers these days. Where the numbers are is in social media, and those platforms operate differently. Twitter has private rooms where they can congregate, and a look at the Twitter hashtag UniteTheRight or AltRight is more than enlightening. So while a certain website will get traffic (although I've seen one domain is being yanked after they called the young woman killed in Charlottesville a string of pejoratives), organization is being done in large part through much faster-acting venues than message boards.

Check out the poster artwork on Twitter here, along with the hashtags and a list of people/orgs involved:


And regarding private rooms:

How a network of little-known Twitter “rooms” helps die-hard fans amplify Trump’s message, attack CNN, and spread #MAGA to the world.


I've watched as the right has tried to distance itself from this, and it's pathetic. Its a 'conspiracy to effect a coup against Trump,' it's a 'false flag,' It's the 'deep state trying to discredit the right by planting fake alt-righters amongst them,' and on and on. They're filled with hate, they're empowered by Trump, and they want to pretend they're just being good 'patriots.' The only ones they're deceiving are themselves.

DHHHhzuWAAI-FUc.jpg



The white supremacist response to Trump's unwillingness to put blame on the alt-right white supremacists:
Trump comments were good. He didn’t attack us. He just said the nation should come together. Nothing specific against us.

He said that we need to study why people are so angry, and implied that there was hate… on both sides!

So he implied the antifa are haters.

There was virtually no counter-signaling of us at all.

He said he loves us all.

Also refused to answer a question about White Nationalists supporting him.

No condemnation at all.

When asked to condemn, he just walked out of the room.

Really, really good.

God bless him.
1. not saying a direct word does not come to " he loves us" think logically right? so whom ever said that is ignorant and incorrect.

2. there are multiple sides and groups at play. condemn them all for their violence. not just one side for some of their violence.

3. hashtags are used by anyone. that doesnt really demonstrate a role of thumb for everyone.

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
Violence is not balanced. it progresses and continues to foster more violence that is extended beyond past violent act.

This shouldnt make us abscent minded to idiocy and wrong doing by all groups. We should not refrain ourselves from criticising more than just the white nationalists.
I think it's important to distinguish between tactics and aim. The aim of the Nazi lovers is vile. Opposing that in principle is virtuous. Choosing the wrong means to oppose it may invite reasoned censure, but it doesn't invite the suggestion of moral equivalence.


Apparently not. Yahoo has amended. So that's some hope. :thumb:
 

randomvim

New member
Is this guy with the nazi armband deplorable?

DHHHhzuWAAI-FUc.jpg



We know Trump certainly has not labeled him as such. We also know that one of Trump's base said this ...

“I would recommend you take a good look in the mirror & remember it was White Americans who put you in the presidency, not radical leftists,” David Duke

Why do you suppose he doesn't address Duke ... personally? He has no problem screeching on about Dems, Clinton, Republicans, Obama, China, NK, the news media, celebrities ... the only person and group he hasn't called out is Russia ... and white nationalists.
wow. one guy in a group of people. wearing a hat ive seen some steal. I dont know what that guy believes and i do not wish to guess at it. its a picture which can tell a thousand lies with the truth.

2. trump like me probably doesnt know who that is. i doubt trump seen him.

3. this doesnt negate the fact that not all people voted for trump are white or racist. ive seen plenty of black citizens wear same red hat. wear rebel flags. this isnt cut and dry. not cut down the center.

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk
 

Rusha

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
wow. one guy in a group of people. wearing a hat ive seen some steal. I dont know what that guy believes and i do not wish to guess at it. its a picture which can tell a thousand lies with the truth.

2. trump like me probably doesnt know who that is. i doubt trump seen him.

3. this doesnt negate the fact that not all people voted for trump are white or racist. ive seen plenty of black citizens wear same red hat. wear rebel flags. this isnt cut and dry. not cut down the center.

Hat? :plain: So, you are unable or unwilling to say that the guy wearing a nazi sign is deplorable? Those he is with don't see it as deplorable.
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
wow. one guy in a group of people. wearing a hat ive seen some steal.
So you're suggesting the crowd that doesn't appear to be concerned with his presence may be tolerating a thief as well?

I dont know what that guy believes and i do not wish to guess at it.
You don't have to guess. He's wearing his heart on his sleeve.

its a picture which can tell a thousand lies with the truth.
You know what should distinguish truth from a lie? Reason. Not desire. So the apparent truth is before you. The question is what reason do you have to doubt it?

3. this doesnt negate the fact that not all people voted for trump are white or racist.
Completely true. It only underscores the open comfort level of those who supported him who are. And that suggests something. To some it may be as simple as their voting for his skin color. But how likely is that?

ive seen plenty of black citizens wear same red hat. wear rebel flags. this isnt cut and dry. not cut down the center.
Depends on what you mean by "this."
 

WizardofOz

New member
wow. one guy in a group of people.

It's an example of a mentality at play.

wearing a hat ive seen some steal.
:rolleyes: Is that what most likely happened here or are you simply playing incredulous?

I dont know what that guy believes and i do not wish to guess at it.

We know two things that he believes, don't we?

its a picture which can tell a thousand lies with the truth.
Whoa, that's deep. What lies does it tell with the truth? Any examples?

2. trump like me probably doesnt know who that is. i doubt trump seen him.
What is the significance as to whether Trump personally knows all of his Nazi supporters? It's the reason why they choose to support him in the first place, and why they support him so vehemently that is up for discussion.

I doubt Jim Jones knew all of his followers.

3. this doesnt negate the fact that not all people voted for trump are white or racist.

Just as this tidbit doesn't negate the fact that many are indeed, racist.

ive seen plenty of black citizens wear same red hat. wear rebel flags. this isnt cut and dry. not cut down the center.

This is just hand waving. "These aren't the droids you're looking for".
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
And there's the goal of the whole op.

Yep. David Duke tweeted to Trump to think about who made him president. Clearly he did, and so failed to condemn the republican Nazi white racist who killed that woman.

Stupid move I think. Yes, he could not have won without the support of those people. But if he had shifted left after the election, he would have gotten a large number of moderate republicans who would have more than replaced the Alt-right supporters.







From The Guardian, no less.[/QUOTE]
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Who were America's mortal enemies during WWII?

We chose to make germany our enemy


Japan chose to make us their enemy

Are you defending American Nazi's or...?

Nope

They're stupid people playing stupid people tricks

Since this dint even get a mention on the cbc, i don't really care :idunno:


I can imagine how the US msm is playing this up, seeing as how the ghettos have been quiet this summer
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top