How do you defend yourself against people who will blow themselves up to kill you?
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
1. Try to control access to the means of launching attacks.
2. Try to avoid the causes of that willingness.
3. Vigilance.
4. Design spaces to minimize impact of attacks.
You would get us all killed.
I think this is how I would handle it if I were a gun-toting conservative out with my family:
http://www.jokeindex.com/joke.asp?Joke=3848
How do you defend yourself against people who will blow themselves up to kill you?
What did the Greatest Generation do?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamikaze#Allied_defensive_tactics
What they were up against:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamikaze#Training
What did the Greatest Generation do?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamikaze#Allied_defensive_tactics
What they were up against:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamikaze#Training
haha!
But in all seriousness, if someone is planning to blow themselves up to kill others, they should be tried for conspiracy to murder and be executed, swiftly and painfully, because in his heart, he is already a murderer.
But you have said Trump is wrong.....sooooo......stupid liberal.
You mean like "Safe Spaces"
In other words, make it so that a person can't commit a crime? You apparently have very little knowledge of how resourceful humans are...
What if the cause of that willingness to kill others is freedom and loving one's neighbor and capitalism etc?
I, for one, agree that the government needs to be more vigilant, but they can't do that with all the crime going on that is a result of bad laws and bad government. As far as surveillance goes, the government has a right to punish criminals, and they can't do that if they don't know who the criminals are.
Again, is your goal to make it so that a person can't commit a crime?
From what I've seen, that's not much of a deterrent of crime.
Far better to make it so that a person won't commit a crime.
musterion
Well-known member
With unrestricted immigration across open [non]borders.
By defending Mohammedism as the ultimate religion of peace, no matter what Mohammedans do in the name and by the teachings of Mohammed.
By disarming as many Americans as possible and by making lawful gun ownership as onerous as possible, and by forbidding the profiling of likely terrorists.
Notice carefully...he doesn't say "do everything possible to prevent attacks," he says "minimize the impact." That tells you he thinks some murders by Mohammedans are acceptable. Kinda like the Mayor of London, the Mohammedan who I believe said Mohammedan terrorism is just a fact of life.
Funny, I don't think I've mentioned Trump in this thread. Go on, what has he proposed to control access to the means of launching attacks? I might blow your mind and agree with him.
Oh, I forgot a step:
5. Make sure to attack anyone who doesn't completely agree with you about other matters to keep yourself ideologically pure. That'll help tons.
dodge
New member
Pray for God to place a hedge of protection around you also praying God deliver you from temptation and keep you from evil.
Works ! 1 tour in Viet Nam- 3 times to Iraq and 3 times to Afghanistan as a civilian D.O.D. contract employee.
I used to think Detroit was a dump. Then I was a Kabul resident and saw what a real dump is. Decades of communism, then decades of the Taliban.
No. The goal is to make it harder to commit a crime, and to reduce the impact.
When has that happened? Do you think we've ever done anything to bring about ISIS?
I'm gonna count that as at least partial agreement.
No. But to reduce the opportunities and the impact.
How do you accomplish the later? Seems more like pie in the sky than anything I suggested, in addition to being even more vague.
dodge
New member
I spent some time in Kabul and Kandahar both. Last place I was at in Afghanistan was at F.O.B. Shank.
Nick, one would have to see Kabul or any place in Afghanistan ( or Iraq ) to understand or believe how much of a dump it really is.