It's a direction society is unfortunately going, but it's not the case in a courtroom.
Yet
Pornographers protest pornography
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
It's a direction society is unfortunately going, but it's not the case in a courtroom.
Yet
will do. no need to discriminate and belittle mentally challenged individuals whilst making a poor comment about another person being evil or such
Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
i wasn't doing that
glassjester
Well-known member
He's not going to stop saying "retard," man.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
as well, i will vigorously defend those who are developmentally delayed (we don't call them retards anymore) or otherwise physically or mentally challenged
if you use that word, you are. you comparing an evil person to that of someone who is mentally ill (whether from birth or due to an event) and may pertain no evil deed.
again, your words.
" i'd have used 'evil' or 'retarded' or 'condemned to burn in hell for eternity' "
so by quick examination, those words or descriptions are interchangable. you would use either one for the same person.
you see no flaw in that?
Ill leave it hear since this is not even thread topic, but please refrain from such inappropriate and incorrect usage. especially if you "defend" mentally challenged individuals despite your ealier post identifies them as "evil" or " condemned to burn in hell..."
Tapatalk
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
well, no i'm not
you may choose to see it that way, but it doesn't affect my intent
you are welcome to define your own reality all you like
but you don't get to define mine
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
they're also intellectually retarded, seeking the government to treat them like children
musterion
Well-known member
Good point, but for me that still falls under moral retardation, which always leads to all manner of iniquity. Many seem emotionally retarded, though.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
would that include the hillary supporters who cried for months?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well of course he isn't, just like there's those who continue to give that type of trolling a free pass and indulge in it themselves, either directly or indirectly and pass it off as being 'moral'.
So it goes...
glassjester
Well-known member
Passing off name-calling as moral? Strange.
glassjester
Well-known member
Although I guess it has its place in certain situations.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
seems to me that name-calling is appropriate when it's used appropriately :idunno:
| 1. Ye blind guides (Matt. 23:16). 2. Ye fools (Matt. 23:17). 3. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees…for ye are like whited supulchres…full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness (Matt. 23:27). 4. Ye serpents (Matt. 23:33). 5. Ye generation of vipers (Matt. 23:33). 6. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! (Luke 11:44). 7. Ye are as graves which appear not (Luke 11:44). https://bible.org/illustration/names-jesus-called-scribes-and-pharisees |
glassjester
Well-known member
Right, "appropriate" being the qualifier in dispute, I'm sure.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
glassjester
Well-known member
"retard" gets a better response than "fools"
What kind of response do you hope to get, and why?