The Late Great Urantia Revelation
- Thread starter Caino
- Start date
- Status
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
Blessings
Blessings
Excellent, it must be my ISP connection,....which doesn't allow for the Youtube video to playback,...says to try later :think:
Paper 196, the last paper is most significant
My former commentary on the Neville Goddard video holds, on the subject of the 'thought-adjuster' which is the very pre-personal spirit-fragment of Deity which indwells the human mind, also called 'divine monitors' or 'Father-fragments'. Only that spirit-presence within us mortals is 'very God' (as it were), while our mortal soul is human, yet given the opportunity by merging with that spirit-fragment to become 'immortal'. So understanding these fine points and particulars enables us to discuss and explore such relationships and their wonderful potential. Such a subject is open to all true religionists, whether of judeo-Christian backgrounds or any other religious tradition, since the soul and its relationship with God, those aspects which are mortal and immortal are germane to the subject of religion.
Blessings
Excellent, it must be my ISP connection,....which doesn't allow for the Youtube video to playback,...says to try later :think:
Paper 196, the last paper is most significant
My former commentary on the Neville Goddard video holds, on the subject of the 'thought-adjuster' which is the very pre-personal spirit-fragment of Deity which indwells the human mind, also called 'divine monitors' or 'Father-fragments'. Only that spirit-presence within us mortals is 'very God' (as it were), while our mortal soul is human, yet given the opportunity by merging with that spirit-fragment to become 'immortal'. So understanding these fine points and particulars enables us to discuss and explore such relationships and their wonderful potential. Such a subject is open to all true religionists, whether of judeo-Christian backgrounds or any other religious tradition, since the soul and its relationship with God, those aspects which are mortal and immortal are germane to the subject of religion.
Lon
Well-known member
2Ti 4:1 I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom:
2Ti 4:2 preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching.
2Ti 4:3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions,
2Ti 4:4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.
2Ti 4:5 As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.
2Ti 4:2 preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching.
2Ti 4:3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions,
2Ti 4:4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.
2Ti 4:5 As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.
Lon
Well-known member
Gal 1:7 not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ.
Gal 1:8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:10 For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ.
Gal 1:11 For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel.
Gal 1:12 For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ.
Gal 1:8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:10 For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ.
Gal 1:11 For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel.
Gal 1:12 For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ.
Excellent, it must be my ISP connection,....which doesn't allow for the Youtube video to playback,...says to try later :think:
Paper 196, the last paper is most significant
My former commentary on the Neville Goddard video holds, on the subject of the 'thought-adjuster' which is the very pre-personal spirit-fragment of Deity which indwells the human mind, also called 'divine monitors' or 'Father-fragments'. Only that spirit-presence within us mortals is 'very God' (as it were), while our mortal soul is human, yet given the opportunity by merging with that spirit-fragment to become 'immortal'. So understanding these fine points and particulars enables us to discuss and explore such relationships and their wonderful potential. Such a subject is open to all true religionists, whether of judeo-Christian backgrounds or any other religious tradition, since the soul and its relationship with God, those aspects which are mortal and immortal are germane to the subject of religion.
Germane Jackson?
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
Don't forget in this epistle he really shows his disdain and contempt for the original apostles of Jesus,....Peter would not agree with Paul's rant above, since it was Paul's anxiety over his conflict with the Jerusalem community that stirred this up.
See Bet Emet Ministries perspective on 'Galations' in the bottom section here
Paul makes some grandiose boasting here and elsewhere.
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
Yes, Paul taught and proclaims HIS own gospel...and his own apostleship.
Blood atonement is no longer essential, neither was it the only way of atonement in the OT, anyways. My former thread 'Atonement without blood' fully covered this subject. The UB account of Jesus gospel is fundamentally sound and agrees in principle with the synoptic gospels, mainly focusing on the Fatherhood of God and Brotherhood of Man, the goodnews of sonship with God, in the kingdom of Spirit-born or renewed souls, led by the Spirit to DO God's will. Its all about doing God's will, living a Spirit-led life of love and service. All 'christians' born of the Spirit would agree with this fundamental principle.
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
If your insinuating the UB is distorted, its not...since as a whole compendium of papers, it is very uniform, consistent and integrous as far as its cosmology, principles, ethics and morals are concerned. Perhaps 'distortions' may exist within peoples minds or they may be projecting such?
- as far as distorting subjects,...survey the whole forum for a host of odd, strange or peculiar topics. I'm sure you'll find your share.
You don't know if unfamiliar spirits are distorted. Unfamiliar means unfamiliar. You say you do but I'm not listening to you. We know betterIf your insinuating the UB is distorted, its not...since as a whole compendium of papers, it is very uniform, consistent and integrous as far as its cosmology, principles, ethics and morals are concerned. Perhaps 'distortions' may exist within peoples minds or they may be projecting such?
Lon
Well-known member
Don't forget in this epistle he really shows his disdain and contempt for the original apostles of Jesus,....Peter would not agree with Paul's rant above, since it was Paul's anxiety over his conflict with the Jerusalem community that stirred this up.
See Bet Emet Ministries perspective on 'Galations' in the bottom section here
Paul makes some grandiose boasting here and elsewhere.
I kind of expect this sort of thing from those who have never read the NT, certainly not retaining any of it. I don't care that you two want to tear down the Apostle. So did Joseph Smith. So did Hayes. Cults do what cults do simply and predictably because they don't want to be accountable to God, but make up whatever fits their fancy. "My God doesn't....." Nobody cares about 'your' god or 'my' god. We can make any kind or one up. The ONLY thing that matters is who God actually is. He promises His word will not return void, so it really doesn't matter that you argue with it either. You two are accountable to it, simply because you've heard it. Choosing to ignore it or attempt to explain it away does nothing to accountability. You are accountable to God for your rejection. He keeps account.
Bible isn't speculation
141:4.2 In answer to Thomas's question,“Who is this God of the kingdom? Jesus replied: “God is your Father, and religion —my gospel—is nothing more nor less than the believing recognition of the truth that you are his son. And I am here among you in the flesh to make clear both of these ideas in my life and teachings
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
Omnipresence
Omnipresence
You asked if TOL had room for distorted 'topics'. I amply responded.
There is only One infinite Spirit, one Life from which all things and beings derive their existence.....There is nothing 'unfamiliar' to this infinite consciousness which is omniscient. It is One and All.
Your own religious denominationalism and dissecting mind would make something 'familiar' or 'unfamiliar'. God is one. You cannot dissect, divide or denominate 'God' who is indivisible.
Omnipresence
You asked if TOL had room for distorted 'topics'. I amply responded.
There is only One infinite Spirit, one Life from which all things and beings derive their existence.....There is nothing 'unfamiliar' to this infinite consciousness which is omniscient. It is One and All.
Your own religious denominationalism and dissecting mind would make something 'familiar' or 'unfamiliar'. God is one. You cannot dissect, divide or denominate 'God' who is indivisible.
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
The logos of the Spirit............
The logos of the Spirit............
Truth, wisdom, reason, logic is wherever you find it; it is not limited to one collection of books or to some exclusive religious catalogue.
The logos of the Spirit............
Truth, wisdom, reason, logic is wherever you find it; it is not limited to one collection of books or to some exclusive religious catalogue.
- Status