User Tag List

Page 4 of 32 FirstFirst 123456714 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 474

Thread: Did we re-evolve after the comet that killed all the dinosaurs?

  1. #46
    cattyfan
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mighty_duck View Post
    For the same reason we fight viruses, bacteria, tigers, earthquakes, hurricanes etc from killing us off. Just because something is "natural", doesn't mean we have to submissively accept it and let it hurt us.

    Hey!!! That's the same argument some people use for being anti-gay! Just because it may be naturally occurring doesn't make it good.

  2. #47
    Over 4000 post club rexlunae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The high desert
    Posts
    4,604
    Thanks
    763
    Thanked 1,679 Times in 1,075 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    691962
    Quote Originally Posted by cattyfan View Post
    Hey!!! That's the same argument some people use for being anti-gay! Just because it may be naturally occurring doesn't make it good.
    It's called the naturalistic fallacy. And you're right, just because something is natural does not mean that it's good. Otherwise pedophilia would have to be acceptable. There are other reasons that homosexuality is acceptable, but that seems out-of-scope for this thread.

  3. #48
    Your powers are weak, old man. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,570
    Thanks
    210
    Thanked 1,276 Times in 670 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    62 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    971588
    Quote Originally Posted by rexlunae View Post
    There are other reasons that homosexuality is acceptable, but that seems out-of-scope for this thread.
    Are you trying to tell us something?

    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Download the new TOL app for iPhone, iPad, and Android...


  4. #49
    Journeyman icilian fenner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by cattyfan View Post
    Hey!!! That's the same argument some people use for being anti-gay! Just because it may be naturally occurring doesn't make it good.
    Doesn't make it bad either.

    A lot of the "gay is natural" argument stems from the anti-homo argument that goes that it's un-natural. So hopefully having put paid to that, the anti-homo crowd now try to make out that the only reason people who don't have a problem with gay people is that it's natural.



    It's not a problem because homosexual relationships with adults don't intrinsically differ from a lot of heterosexual relationships - and although they may differ proportionally in certain tendencies, both groups run the gamit from vanilla to Häagen Dazs's white chocolate raspberry truffle, sexually.

    In essence, if a man is naturally violent, that would be a problem, even so. But if a man is pleasant, naturally, that's not a problem.

    Theres no problem where there's no problem...

  5. #50
    Over 4000 post club rexlunae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The high desert
    Posts
    4,604
    Thanks
    763
    Thanked 1,679 Times in 1,075 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    691962
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight View Post
    Are you trying to tell us something?

    I'll leave that to your imagination for now.

  6. #51
    Old Timer MrRadish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    A bubble of my own self-satisfaction. Which is in the New Forest somewhere in Hampshire.
    Posts
    431
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight View Post
    I thought the latest was that dinosaurs were descendants of birds?
    Other way round, surely?

  7. #52
    Your powers are weak, old man. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,570
    Thanks
    210
    Thanked 1,276 Times in 670 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    62 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    971588
    Quote Originally Posted by icilian fenner View Post
    Doesn't make it bad either.

    A lot of the "gay is natural" argument stems from the anti-homo argument that goes that it's un-natural. So having put paid to that, the anti-homo crowd now try to make out that the only reason people who don't have a problem with gay people is that it's natural.



    It's not a problem because homosexual relationships with adults don't intrinsically differ from a lot of heterosexual relationships - and although they may differ proportionally in certain tendencies, both groups run the gamit from vanilla to Häagen Dazs's white chocolate raspberry truffle, sexually.

    In essence, if a man is naturally violent, that would be a problem, even so. But if a man is pleasant, naturally, that's not a problem.

    Theres no problem where there's no problem...
    Uh, we are getting way off topic here but I think it's pretty safe to say homosexuality is unnatural. That really isn't much of a stretch is it.... I mean... even a basic understanding of biology can make that clear. (please, please, lets not explore this much further because it gets too gross very quickly).

    All I will say is... certain body parts are obviously made to fit with other body parts. As my dad used to say about homosexuals.... "it's no different than trying to breath through your liver." ....errrrr.... something like that.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Download the new TOL app for iPhone, iPad, and Android...


  8. #53
    Your powers are weak, old man. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,570
    Thanks
    210
    Thanked 1,276 Times in 670 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    62 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    971588
    Quote Originally Posted by MrRadish View Post
    Other way round, surely?


    Yes... switch that up.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Download the new TOL app for iPhone, iPad, and Android...


  9. #54
    Journeyman icilian fenner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight View Post
    Uh, we are getting way off topic here but I think it's pretty safe to say homosexuality is unnatural. That really isn't much of a stretch is it.... I mean... even a basic understanding of biology can make that clear. (please, please, lets not explore this much further because it gets too gross very quickly).

    And sure, let's reign back on the argument - the most important point I was making is that the reason people argue for homosexuality being accepted isn't exclusively on the grounds of 'it's natural'.

    Whether or not that belief is in error doesn't change that the argument isn't'it's not a problem, since it's natural'.

    DISCLAIMER: I'm sure people argue sometimes exclusively on this basis, as all sides of a debate have it's share of foolish remarks.

    All I will say is... certain body parts are obviously made to fit with other body parts. As my dad used to say about homosexuals.... "it's no different than trying to breath through your liver." ....errrrr.... something like that.


    That's a case against sodomy (and oral sex?). Whoops.

  10. #55
    cattyfan
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mighty_duck View Post
    For the same reason we fight viruses, bacteria, tigers, earthquakes, hurricanes etc from killing us off. Just because something is "natural", doesn't mean we have to submissively accept it and let it hurt us.
    Sorry, Knight. I didn't mean to derail the conversation. I was just pointing out the aforementioned argument has been used in other circumstances.

    My apologies.

  11. #56
    Journeyman Mr Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    227
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight View Post
    I thought the latest was that dinosaurs were descendants of birds?
    Other way round, birds are descendents of dinosaurs.

    Personally I think the asteroid theory of the Late Cretaceous extinction is rather... unconvincing. At least as a primary cause. There almost certainly was a major impact around the time of the KT boundary - Iridium and glass in the intervening layer strongly point to it, and we've found a pretty damn big crater dating to the period.

    However, the Late Cretaceous event is only one of a number of major extinction event (one of five referred to as 'the big five') and not one of the others has corresponding evidence for an major impact at the same time. I find it more likely that there is an underlying explanation for all extinction events.

    Moreover, the nature of the extinctions doesn't seem to me to match with any sudden cause. In fact, the number of dinosaur genera was already falling well before the KT boundary, with several major groups going extinct well before the impact and others in decline. The same is true of other less striking groups that disappeared around the same time. Even those that disappeared 'suddenly' at the end of the KT probably disappeared over the course of some 100,000-250,000 years - an eyeblink in geological time but a much longer period that any particulates from the impact would have remained in the atmosphere. And, yes, there probably would have been a more lasting climatic shift as a result of the impact, but there the dinosaurs had been around for 100 million years and weathered a great many climatic shifts before their end. Finally, there is no clear pattern in terms of body size, habitat or apparent lifestyle among those that did or didn't get wiped out - something that an extinction event precipitated by a meteor strike would be expected to produce.

    Oh, and one last point: computer simulations of evolution produce extinction events without any external input.
    If you're really a Goth, where were you when we sacked Rome?

  12. #57
    Over 500 post club PlastikBuddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Still going to and fro in the earth, and walking up and down in it- but now looking up.
    Posts
    650
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    485
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight View Post
    I thought the latest was that dinosaurs were descendants of birds?
    No, birds are the descendants of SOME dinosaurs, the smaller ornithischians.
    "Those who have crossed
    With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom
    Remember us--if at all--not as lost
    Violent souls, but only
    As the hollow men
    The stuffed men." ... T.S. Eliot
    γνῶθι σεαυτόν

  13. #58
    Over 500 post club PlastikBuddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Still going to and fro in the earth, and walking up and down in it- but now looking up.
    Posts
    650
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    485
    Quote Originally Posted by cattyfan View Post
    Yeah...

    I remember when I was a kid, I had one of those Golden Books with dinosaurs all over the front. It described the T-rex as slow...lumbering...cumbersome...upright, and dragging its tale behind it.

    Now, 35 years later, we're supposed to believe they were quick and moving upright, more like a bird.
    Let's hear a round of applause for the advance of knowledge that is science!
    How did they decide this about a bunch of animals the "experts" have never actually seen?
    Comparing the skeletal structure of extinct animals with those of living ones. Making models based on what we DO know and drawing conclusions. Revising what DO know as new fossils are discovered. Nobody said it was easy.
    All they have are some bones...but we're supposed to take as fact this new line of "conclusions."
    As provisional "fact", rather- taking into account that we haven't actually observed them alive and are basing our conclusions on a limited amount of information.
    "Those who have crossed
    With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom
    Remember us--if at all--not as lost
    Violent souls, but only
    As the hollow men
    The stuffed men." ... T.S. Eliot
    γνῶθι σεαυτόν

  14. #59
    Over 500 post club PlastikBuddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Still going to and fro in the earth, and walking up and down in it- but now looking up.
    Posts
    650
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    485
    Quote Originally Posted by cattyfan View Post
    Hey!!! That's the same argument some people use for being anti-gay! Just because it may be naturally occurring doesn't make it good.
    It doesn't necessarily make it bad, either. We must take other factors into consideration- in the case of global warming or cooling for example, our own survival could possibly be concern to some of us. Maybe it would be a good thing in terms of the evolution of some other species that could move into niches now held by us bossy humans, but I sure ain't planning on throwing in the towel so some cockroaches can live easier.
    "Those who have crossed
    With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom
    Remember us--if at all--not as lost
    Violent souls, but only
    As the hollow men
    The stuffed men." ... T.S. Eliot
    γνῶθι σεαυτόν

  15. #60
    Over 500 post club Real Sorceror's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Florida, where people go to die
    Posts
    541
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by cattyfan View Post
    Hey!!! That's the same argument some people use for being anti-gay! Just because it may be naturally occurring doesn't make it good.
    Gays are the leading cause of hurricanes. And drama llamas.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us