Wow, talk about an absurd statement given your fear based need to accept a literal Genesis.
Creation vs. Evolution II
- Thread starter patrick jane
- Start date
Wow, talk about an absurd statement given your fear based need to accept a literal Genesis.
Indeed. And I accept that both models appear consistent with the observable universe. But it still has to be explained how Maxwell and Einstein can be right for a round-trip measurement, with the operation of the values of permittivity and permeability (and photon mass) contained therein, but the model of the propagation of light through space can be wrong because there are separate values for the constants depending on the direction of travel. How can magnetic fields or electric fields move into the next bit of space-time in two (or more?) different ways?
AiG calls it a theory, but of course it's not. As usual.
Stuart
Greg Jennings
New member
You believe ridiculous things that have been proven untrue, such as the first humans could write and speak language (I mean this is just overwhelmingly false) while rejecting well established scientific methods such as radiometric+stratigraphic dating techniques. If you can't see the irony there, then bless you
What was God's reconciliation with Adam?
6days
New member
God created humans as highly intelligent beings. We know they spoke language.
Your belief system that man developed language skill has lead to false conclusions about Neandertals.
6days
New member
Examples: coelacanths, Junk DNA, pseudogenes, Neandertals, Miller Urey, useless appendix ETC
And... Your young man is given a padded cell.
We could also, put your young man in a padded cell for claiming that life arose from inorganic materials...that everything came from nothing.
However, in the case of Lot's wife we have evidence of divine inspiration...an omnipotent, omniscient God. We have evidence of inerrancy supported by historical accounts and supported by science.
6days
New member
Nope... not true.
We have the History book of the universe.
It doesn't look old. You rely on all types of hypothetical entities attempting to make your "old" beliefs match the real world.
Science ALWAYS is consistent with God's Word
Greg Jennings
New member
Oh really? So tell me, did Neanderthals have writing language?
And you didn't answer before, what was God's reconciliation with Adam?
So God's Word says the universe is billions of years old and humans are apes. Thanks, glad you cleared that up for me.
And, since bats aren't birds, the Jewish bible is not consistent with science. And it's not consistent with science that humans walk again after being judicially killed, so the NT isn't consistent with science.
So the Judeo-christian scriptures are not god's word.
Stuart
6days
New member
We don't know if this particular people group had lost writing skill or not. We do know, contrary to evolutionist claims in the past, Neandertals were intelligent and as capable of speech as you and I.
Col. 1 May help you, although I'm not sure what your actual question is. Are you wondering if OT believers have been reconciled?
6days
New member
God's Word and science are ALWAYS consistent. Science often ends up proving evolutionist claims false...the Bible correct.
BTW... The Bible does not call a bat, a 'bird'. The verse you refer to uses the word owph which is winged creatures.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
carl linoleum, the uppsalian ubermensch?
i believe he's been dead for a few hundred years
Greg Jennings
New member
Ok. So if the word was owph meaning winged creatures, and the writer made sure to include both bats and birds under that umbrella.......why would he not also mention flying reptiles such as pterosaurs (since you believe that humans and dinosaurs coexisted)? Do you really think he'd leave out the largest winged creatures in existence?
Dear GregJ,
Adam did not write the book of Genesis. Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible's Old Testament. Moses wrote them down with a lot of God's help. So he wrote what God said happened. God had talked to Moses before that and Moses even saw God's back parts, but not His face. God was quite able to tell Moses word for word what happened from Creation to Moses' time. No Adam did not pen the Book of Genesis. Come on.
Also, Greg, God used Chemistry to change Lot's wife into a pillar of salt. He turns other people's bodies into ashes and the dust of the Earth. He can do things you wouldn't fathom because you don't know Him. That's why you don't understand a lot of stuff. If He could make creatures and man out of the ground, He certainly could do whatever needs to be done to His Creations in an instant.
Why is it that you cling to your atheism, knowing that the great majority of people believe in God and Jesus, and the Bible. The Bible is the best-selling Book of all time. There must be a reason. You think that just because you are in the minority, that makes you right. I'm not saying it's based on a popularity contest, but instead a good sense belief by a lot of diverse people. God called on the ones who believe in Him, and the ones whom He hasn't called are the one's who don't believe in Him because they don't want to be bothered with God's rules or commandments. That is what's going on. You think that God treats His Creations unfairly. Well, you don't know the half of what is going on. You speak about Him and you've never read half of the Bible. So you don't know Him, but you like to speak against Him. That is blasphemy of God and that's not good at all. Jesus said that if you can't handle all of the commandments, at least keep the first two, namely, love God with all of your heart, and mind, and soul. And, love each other as God loves us. The rest of the commandments will fall into place at one time or another. Just keep two rules. Is that so hard?
Praise God!!
Michael
Dear Greg J.,
Now you want us to believe in Uranium/Lead radiometric dating, and other forms of radiometric dating using other elements. I don't trust your dating for a moment, just like you all swore to us up and down that C-14 dating was absolutely correct. You are wrong about man being Evolved instead of believing that God created him. You are dead wrong and yet you want me to believe your story about dating methods? Tell it to some gullible people instead.
Warmest Regards,
Michael