Gore likens 'global warming' skeptics to racists, supporters of apartheid and homopho
- Thread starter serpentdove
- Start date
Scott Pruitt to disband the the Climate Change religion from within as EPA chief. :BRAVO:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/08/trump-to-nominate-epa-critic-pruitt-to-lead-agency.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/08/trump-to-nominate-epa-critic-pruitt-to-lead-agency.html
He may be able to stop the EPA from doing anything about climate change, but he can't stop the sea from rising.
Nonsense! just like the climate change religion you adhere to...:carryon:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...ir-heads-on-rising-ocean-claims/#182f39684f03
gcthomas
New member
In 2013-14 there were 17000 papers published on climate change, and only four came down against. Forbes seems to be relying on a 92 year old ex-scientist who never worked on climate change, and who is game for rejecting the links between CFCs and ozone loss, ultraviolet light and melanomas, passive smoking and health problems ...
And the article is still clear that the earth is warming and that sea levels are rising.
This article is hardly a big hit for your pro-oil anti-science side.
Do you believe the sky is falling too?
Greg Jennings
New member
It's going to be hilarious when all these people denying climate change have to move away from their homes due to the rising sea level. Gonna be a whole new kind of immigrant crisis.
I'm ok with debate about how much people are responsible for climate change (I believe the answer to be somewhat), but denying it simply shows either ignorance on the subject or inability to comprehend it
Crack a book, moron.
Yea, Yea, Yea...save it for the lemmings you run with that listen & accept agenda driven junk science. :carryon:
:yawn: Wake me up when it happens...
Greg Jennings
New member
Lol
Learn some better insults.
gcthomas
New member
If you ate not just rejecting science that concludes things that you don't like, how are you making that judgement?
I took lots of years learning the techniques of science, so I am professionally capable of judging the quality of science papers. What expertise do you bring such that you can reasonably reject the work asks judgement of 99.93% of actual working expert scientists?
Gut instinct and politico-religious dogma? Huh.
Not rejecting science that I don't like, I reject pseudo-science that alters data to prop up the hypothesis. What we have here is a grand scam to infringe on the individual liberty & private property rights of people while making gobs of money selling it. The entire premise is a global sham with very little credible evidence to prove it. You can attempt to prove it from your internet library of graphs & so-called peer reviewed papers written by the same hacks that are paid to study this nonsense but, I don't buy it.
Easy. You define your terms clearly, stick to them consistently and present evidence for your claims. :thumb:
Demanding that your opponent toes the line while making yourself out to be an expert on everything doesn't cut it. :nono:
Alate_One
Well-known member
Here's the rub. It's already happening. Miami is regularly flooding. When Insurance companies stop insuring coastal properties, there's likely to be a crash like 2008.
