Greenhouse effect revisited

ClimateSanity

ClimateSanity

New member
Quetzal said:
Hard to say revisited when this is from 2011.
Click to expand...

It never was noticed in "consensus " ....it was ignored like everything that contradicts man-made catastrophic global warming.

Climate alarmist aren't exposed to papers like these unless brought up by skeptics. It is new to most folks who get the same old garbage from NOAA et al like 2015 being the hottest year on record nonsense.
 
Quetzal

Quetzal

New member
ClimateSanity said:
It never was noticed in "consensus " ....it was ignored like everything that contradicts man-made catastrophic global warming.

Climate alarmist aren't exposed to papers like these unless brought up by skeptics. It is new to most folks who get the same old garbage from NOAA et al like 2015 being the hottest year on record nonsense.
Click to expand...
A book report written by a 9 year old during the science fair wasn't noticed either. Both for the same reason, they came up short. Sorry not sorry, nerd.
 
ClimateSanity

ClimateSanity

New member
Quetzal said:
A book report written by a 9 year old during the science fair wasn't noticed either. Both for the same reason, they came up short. Sorry not sorry, nerd.
Click to expand...

This never came up.short. it was ignored without rebuttal. It cannot come up short until it is solidly rebutted.
 
ClimateSanity

ClimateSanity

New member
view
view
 
ClimateSanity

ClimateSanity

New member
Quetzal said:
Can't imagine why. :chuckle:
Click to expand...

I will tell you why. Money and prestige that would be lost if the so called consensus position was shown to be utterly false. There are millions of dollars and maybe billions that's would be allocated to other areas of science and some.people.like.Michael Mann would have to find a real job. This scam is a huge industry with lots of people.making money off it. These people make.so.much money that they are able to.fly private jets to these CC conferences.
 
Quetzal

Quetzal

New member
brewmama said:
It's called belittling and silencing any opposition at all costs. And you think it's funny, and perfectly fine!
Click to expand...
Do you understand how rare a scientific consensus is? You obviously don't or else you wouldn't celebrate your own ignorance. :loser:
 
brewmama

brewmama

New member
Quetzal said:
Do you understand how rare a scientific consensus is? You obviously don't or else you wouldn't celebrate your own ignorance. :loser:
Click to expand...

Do you realize there is NO consensus on the climate? And you think I'm the ignorant one?
 
ClimateSanity

ClimateSanity

New member
Meanwhile, I have a thread up asking how to attach a PDF. Unless someone can help.me here, I'm not interested in the sarcastic mud throwing. I want to discuss these papers and see if you guys can come up.with a real rebuttal.
 
Quetzal

Quetzal

New member
brewmama said:
Do you realize there is NO consensus on the climate? And you think I'm the ignorant one?
Click to expand...
:chuckle: You have no idea what you are talking about. You are speaking from your own opinion with no data to support it (no surprise there).
 
ClimateSanity

ClimateSanity

New member
Quetzal said:
Do you understand how rare a scientific consensus is? You obviously don't or else you wouldn't celebrate your own ignorance. :loser:
Click to expand...

Yes, a true scientific consensus is rare. This one is manufactured. Plus, if these people's grant money disappeared, the consensus would be even smaller.
 
Quetzal

Quetzal

New member
ClimateSanity said:
Meanwhile, I have a thread up asking how to attach a PDF. Unless someone can help.me here, I'm not interested in the sarcastic mud throwing. I want to discuss these papers and see if you guys can come up.with a real rebuttal.
Click to expand...
You want to discuss empirical evidence here? No dice because you are ignoring the tens of thousands of other papers that counter your preconceived notion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top