Hi and Bullinger does have some truth , BUT it needs to be FILTERED by 2 Tim 2:15 !!
I have his book on NUMBERS and HOW TO ENJOY THE BIBLE , but I has sent aletter to them in Indiana and I do get their news letter as a friend gave them my home address and also get Richard Jordans news letter also the same way !!
I learned what Acts 28er know as we had 2 Acts 28er , and Pentcostal , Acts 9 and also Acts 13 in our assembly !!
Now you know how potent it kis when I ask him how he was saved OR how Paul was saved , they RUN !!
dan p
DanP...
Ac28 has a clear testimony on how he was saved.
He does not, however, kow tow to being baited.
Rightly so.
He also does not post on here much.
As for Bullinger, it is a version of some of his erroneous views that some Mads on TOL have adopted and assert are Mad views.
Views Mad has NEVER held to because Mad does NOT study things in the erroneous way in some things that the Acts 28er does.
I'm sure you're familiar with how that in Bullinger's still great book on how to study the Bible, he lays out all these principles for how to study things, only to every so often violate said principles - in that same book.
I forget when he wrote it, or if he wrote it after he no longer held to MAD, but it is clear in that still great book that he was already into a habit of violating sound principles in favor of first impression conclusions on some things that can only end one up at views that are not MAD based.
I say that even though I have a very high regard for him - he was a brilliant individual like few within recorded Christianity and that book is still held in a high regard by many who are not even Dispensational.
When you have a minute, take a look at his piece in that book "This is that, but what is this?"
Both his brilliant mind, and yet it's sabotage of the obvious are evident in that article.
He is so spot on in that book on so much, only to go south on other things.
You sit there, run his assertions through the principles he so well lays out (to see how that kind of thing works in actual practice) only to find yourself wondering every so often, what happened that it appears he simply threw those great principles to the wind, at times.
Great, great book on the principles of studying a thing out - even for its' unexpected lesson from the great man - on the dangers of failing to be consistent...in their application.
