PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
This heretical schismatic insistence disqualifies you from posting in the ECT section, including this thread.
ECT Our triune God
- Thread starter Lon
- Start date
This heretical schismatic insistence disqualifies you from posting in the ECT section, including this thread.
Yes, Jesus was made a man in the image of God, after being born from Mary, as the seed of David.
(Never the seed of God)
LA
The opportunity to avail yourself of the gift of grace through faith that Jesus was who He said He was began at the cross and ends at Christ's return. What about everyone else. What of the children who never formulated this faith in their head? What of the children?
Lon
Well-known member
Not really part of this thread or supportive of it.
Lon
Well-known member
Matthew 19:14
Lon,
Of course you do not support it.
It is scripture.
LA
Of course you do not support it.
It is scripture.
LA
Cross Reference
New member
C'mon, LA. Wake up! Jesus, the man, had to be [*by and of] the Seed of God! How else could a sinless man enter into the race of Adam from the outside? Sin or Sinlessness follows the blood line of the father, not the mother. Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit. The important thing to keep in mind is that, as with Adam was the whole human race made subject to his decisions, by His conception was the whole of the Godhead make subject to the decisions of Jesus. made vulnerable to human "Vanity" per Rom.8:20 KJV, to do things his way. In this was Jesus trusted completely by His Father because of the great Love and worship Jesus had for Him that brought to him the JOY and Vision of His Father's intention. Though Jesus would shed tears and sweat as of drops of blood before it all came to the end, He never waivered in His allegiance to His Father by which He overcame the world. He became the pattern for life for us all.
[*by] By because of the needed sinless conception.
[*of] Being of God assured Him of the Holy Spirit indwelling much as it does for those born again.
The Holy Spirit has no blood.
The Bible says He is the seed of David.
Jesus did waiver, but He was shown how to get through it by the fathering of His Father in experience.
Your idea is that Jesus could not be tempted to sin.
LA
Cross Reference
New member
Adam was too.
Luk 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
No.
You are adding something to the account which is not there.
Wrong again.
Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.
Luk 22:42 Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.
Your manner tells me you do not know the truth.
Making false judgments of another is not the way of those who know Christ in a close manner, or of those who seek to honor Christ.
LA
Cross Reference
New member
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Once again, the common misunderstanding that it is believing (the verb) that saves rather than faith (the noun).
Children have this qualitative functionality. It is adults who outgrow such sincere and simple functionality, tainted by their own hearts and minds.
It doesn't matter if your "learned" and 75 years old, you are a CHILD of God
Cross Reference
New member
Legally? No question. Howver, It is not His intention to leave us in that state. Read 1 John 1,2 and 3.
OMT: Children are teachable. Jesus could well have been inferring that by using them as an example. I rather think so.
Last edited:
Lon
Well-known member
You mean like hijacking a thread that has nothing to do with denial of the Triune view and posting against it? It is not allowed here LA. I've shown an incredible amount of patience, even these last two pages. Please stop. Discuss our view. Ask questions, sure. Promote Unit-Arianism? :nono: There are about 4 other threads, right now, you can post this kind of thing in, not here.
Cross Reference
New member
Last edited:
I'm not sure I understand the distinction your are trying to make as the two seem so intertwined.
Lon
Well-known member
Hello CR, I think we are at the end of this discussion.
We are about at the end of this road because the links and discussion will only become cyclic at this point. By way of wrap up here are a few posts with related reading and then we need to get back to the OP which is the orthodoxy of the Triune view and it's discussion.
As Ask Mr. Religion reminded us:
As to the Lord Jesus Christ being fully man, there is no contest. The heresy you are espousing is however against the creeds and councils, against scripture passages (against the Lord Jesus Christ being Yesterday, Today, and Forever the same).
We are about at the end of this road because the links and discussion will only become cyclic at this point. By way of wrap up here are a few posts with related reading and then we need to get back to the OP which is the orthodoxy of the Triune view and it's discussion.
As Ask Mr. Religion reminded us:
Along with his ensuing post here.
It is time to wrap up the discussion here.
I will thank you, CR, for helping flesh out the problems of your view as Trinitarians understand it, for all, that any can read and appreciate those differences, and then read the scriptures and links. Thanks and lets move on to other topics. -Lon
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Yes, few are. That's why there is so much debate and conjecture by so many from their various perspectives.