Obama nominates child molesting homo for Secretary of the Army
- Thread starter Nick M
- Start date
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
I think he's the guy who gets the coffee at meetings
shagster01
New member
They like little boys and Donald Trump. . .
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/19/politics/trump-delegate-child-porn-gun-explosives/index.html
Are you suggesting that you have seen it? You, Delmar have actual evidence that the President's nominee is a pedophile?
No, I don't buy it.
I'm not the one calling Nick a liar.
You just take him at his word then?
Secretary, Flight Attendant and Nurse are three occupations where I assume that if a guy is working them then he's gay.
I think even that gives him too much credit. If he had actual evidence, he would have stated it at the outset. He's just a bigot. Asking him for evidence is like demanding that stones compose a symphony. All you'll get is silence.
Delmar do you think a person should have some evidence of someone being a pedophile before they call them one or is that an accusation that you take lightly?
The evidence was already presented: The guy's a homo.
Fail.
Great argument.
lain:The guy's a homo; he's perverted normal practice. It deserves investigation, not reward.
shagster01
New member
Nick just has a guilty conscience. He feels the need to divert the attention.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using TheologyOnline mobile app
Sent from my SCH-I545 using TheologyOnline mobile app
Would you be willing to stand before God as a witness and attest that you witnessed the man sexually asulting children? If not, why would you be willing to state that on a public forum?
What about you Nick M. will stand before God and swear that you witnessed this man sexually assaulting children?
shagster01
New member
So what you are saying is that though I have seen no evidence against you for any crime, it may exist, and therefore it makes sense to publicly declare you guilty? :think:
For example, many gun owners commit crimes and you are a gun owner....
Great argument.
You didn't present an argument. You just revealed yourself to be incapable of making a rather simple distinction. What do you expect?
Trust you to get everything utterly wrong.
I called the guy a homo. I don't think anybody is debating that. :idunno:
Sure, I did. Try reading. :thumb: