User Tag List

View Poll Results: Who do you THINK will win Battle Royale IV?

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • JALTUS

    33 89.19%
  • s9s27s54

    4 10.81%
Page 2 of 32 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 474

Thread: BATTLE TALK ~ Battle Royale IV - JALTUS vs. s9s27s54

  1. #16
    Yxboom
    Guest

    Re: the KJV or the Book Of Mormon

    Originally posted by AJ4Yeshua
    Yxboom

    Heyyyyy. Long time no hear.
    Whoa....no kidding. How you been? Good to see you back Bible in hand and all

    I have often enjoyed LDS company and offered a drink to them although recently they have refrained from coming here? Curious. Oh well. It's all good.

    Hopefully you gonna stick around and join us for a marraige ceremony for our fellow Supermoderator Goose and his lady in waiting, Lucybelle.

  2. #17
    Trainee AJ4Yeshua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Goose tying the knot? will wonders never cease!? couldn't have happened to a better sucker.

    Congrats there Goose!

  3. #18
    Journeyman drdeutsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    211
    This should be mildly interesting... if not just embarrasing for s79... Sorry, but I forgot how it goes. I got into a bit of textual criticism with Jaltus on the "God is not an OV'er" thread and barely managed to keep my head above water, so to speak.

    Anyway, I do look forward to the battle and wish both the candidates good luck.

    By the way, Jaltus, there's absolutely nothing wrong with double negatives. For strict schoolmarms, perhaps, but it's merely prescriptive grammar. In fact, double negatives were widely employed in Chaucer's time and are still the rage in modern French (e.g. Je ne sais pas, where both "ne" and "pas" are negations).

    Not to be a nitpicker, but I've been reading The Language Instinct by Steven Pinker. Fascinating stuff.

    God bless,
    Dr. Deutsch
    Praecipitatum verius quam editum "Thrown together rather than edited."
    -Erasmus describing his Textus Receptus (the MS the KJV/NKJV is translated from)

  4. #19
    cirisme
    Guest
    I think Jaltus is winning. He went ahead by leaps and bounds by saying
    You might want to post the link for s9, though.

  5. #20
    cirisme
    Guest
    I'm highly irritated by double negatives.

  6. #21
    cirisme
    Guest
    But all the other grammer errors I make are perfectly acceptable.

  7. #22
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    207
    Originally posted by drdeutsch
    By the way, Jaltus, there's absolutely nothing wrong with double negatives.
    As is always the case when defining that which is "right" and "wrong", it all depends on what is chosen as the standard.

  8. #23
    Over 500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    221
    In English it is wrong. In Greek a double negative asserts a specific point or stresses the negation. In French, it is actually a single negative, the second half specifies the type of negation (pas = default, rien = anything, jamais = ever, etc., so it would be not, nothing, never respectively).
    For Greek conversion, click here.
    <opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of TOL or the TOL Holding Company, and are in fact probably either wrong or dangerous or something even worse. In the event of a world-wide catastrophe coming from one of these posts, all we can say is we did not do it and we warned you not to listen to this post, but NOOOOO, you knew what you were doing all along and yet you STILL managed to destroy part of a continent and yet missed Hollywood! Any resemblance to mathematicians dead or alive is strictly on purpose.>

  9. #24
    Over 500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    221
    Oh, ne by itself means nothing. You should read about the pleonastic ne. (I took French this summer, and frankly I am pretty good at it, though I cannot speak it well I can read it very well)
    For Greek conversion, click here.
    <opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of TOL or the TOL Holding Company, and are in fact probably either wrong or dangerous or something even worse. In the event of a world-wide catastrophe coming from one of these posts, all we can say is we did not do it and we warned you not to listen to this post, but NOOOOO, you knew what you were doing all along and yet you STILL managed to destroy part of a continent and yet missed Hollywood! Any resemblance to mathematicians dead or alive is strictly on purpose.>

  10. #25
    Over 750 post club Brother Vinny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Tulsa, dig it?
    Posts
    767
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 30 Times in 24 Posts

    Blog Entries
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    94177
    Originally posted by JackS
    I still want to know how the KJV can be inspired when it can't even get the 10 commandments correct?

    It's murder, the 6th commandment is you shall not murder. I cringe whenever I see Thou shalt not kill.
    I agree with you, JackS. Here in Tulsa, the PETA folks put a billboard up with a bearded figure (God? Moses?) dressed all in white holding a bunch of carrots with the caption, "I said, 'Thou shalt not KILL!' " As if capital punishment and animal sacrifices weren't both commanded just chapters later.
    "To deny Calvinism is to deny the gospel of Jesus Christ." - Charles Spurgeon

  11. #26
    Yxboom
    Guest
    Paul,

    According to PETA Jesus was also a vegetarian.

    Right in line with

    John 21:13 KJV Jesus then cometh, and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish likewise.

    dont ya think

  12. #27
    Over 750 post club Brother Vinny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Tulsa, dig it?
    Posts
    767
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 30 Times in 24 Posts

    Blog Entries
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    94177
    That's it! That's the billboard!
    "To deny Calvinism is to deny the gospel of Jesus Christ." - Charles Spurgeon

  13. #28
    Journeyman drdeutsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    211
    Well, Jaltus,

    If grammar mavens say that people shouldn't use double negatives, it is because that is prescriptive grammar, not descriptive grammar.

    If someone always says "not hardly" then it is no longer an error -- it is a rule. Much like there are no grammatical errors in Inner City English (i.e. Black English): It is completely consistent in it's use, thus it is grammatical.

    Not to mention that "not hardly" is practically an idiom, and idioms, whether "grammatical" or not, pretty much have their own rules.

    Take "I can't get no satisfaction." You would probably argue that this means "I can get satisfaction" because the two negatives cancel each other out. Wrong! No one on earth would say, after receiving a plentiful amount of satisfaction, "Gee! I can't get no satisfaction!" No, the meaning is quite clear.

    Anyway, I would highly recommend that book. The Language Instinct by Steven Pinker, Ph.D. at MIT. I think it is chapter 12 where he deals with double negatives.

    By the way, I do love prescriptive grammar, as well, and no, I don't use no double negatives. I am, however, compelled as a hopeful linguist, to study descriptive grammar and it's consistency and use.

    God bless,
    Dr. Deutsch
    Praecipitatum verius quam editum "Thrown together rather than edited."
    -Erasmus describing his Textus Receptus (the MS the KJV/NKJV is translated from)

  14. #29
    Journeyman drdeutsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    211
    Originally posted by Redeemed

    As is always the case when defining that which is "right" and "wrong", it all depends on what is chosen as the standard.
    And it depends on what is defined as "standard." Obviously, Standard American English prescriptive grammar would say "no double negatives," "no split infinitives," and "no dangling participles."

    However, if they are used consistently, then they are no longer grammatical errors; rather, they are rules of the language itself, whether that language is used by 1 person or 1 million.

    Dr. Deutsch
    Praecipitatum verius quam editum "Thrown together rather than edited."
    -Erasmus describing his Textus Receptus (the MS the KJV/NKJV is translated from)

  15. #30
    Over 1500 post club themuzicman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,788
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 97 Times in 79 Posts

    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    56743
    We ain't not gonna have no double negatives 'round here nohow.

    Triple negatives, on the other hand....

    Michael
    I don't care how systematic your theology is, until you show me how biblical it is.

    2 Tim 2:15 Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us