User Tag List

View Poll Results: Who is winng Battle Royale III?

Voters
49. You may not vote on this poll
  • Dee Dee Warren

    24 48.98%
  • Jerry Shugart

    25 51.02%
Page 2 of 28 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 413

Thread: BATTLE TALK - Battle Royale III ~ Dee Dee vs. Jerry

  1. #16
    Dee Dee Warren
    Guest
    How do you all like my new Battle Avatar??? Ggggrrrrrhhhhhh!!!!

  2. #17
    Yxboom
    Guest
    I am familiar with both Jerry S. as I have posted along side him for a time in the Dispensational forum and I am familiar with Dee Dee from her consistent posts regarding the preterist view.

    Jerry S. has a great chance for he is very eloquent with Scripture and collected in his discussion; however, Jaltus claim is appropriate that many of his proofs can be used to contradict him as he does not tend to cover the context of his proofs while providing them but it will still require a knowledgable opponent to bring this out.

    Dee Dee has a great chance cause she is just a ball of spunk and even if she lost you would still be scratching your head afterwards cause she's fast and wouldn't let you admit it. Anyway to simply put it she is a force to be reckoned with agree or disagree with her and I personally fear her.

    So I'm expecting a great debate.

  3. #18
    Dee Dee Warren
    Guest
    LOLOLOL!!! YxBoom, flattery will get you everywhere

    And I do agree BTW that Jerry is a worthy opponent. He and I go way back, and that is why I personally invited him to challenge me. But, Jerry also has part of the "credit" for turning me to preterism, so this is an interesting turn of events. It should be very interesting, and I look forward to it.

    I realize coming into this that I am the severe underdog, and that is just fine with me. Any points I earn will be hard-earned, and I expect to have to work for them. That is why I have my game face on.... Grrrrhhhhhh!!!!

    Boy I hope I get to go first...

  4. #19
    Dee Dee Warren
    Guest
    Whhoooo Hoooo!!! I get to go first!!! But... wait a minute... that means I don't get the last word... grrrhhhhhh!!!!

  5. #20
    BANNED AVmetro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Talking Hot turds!! Hot turds!! Whatever Knight!

    Get your BOILED HOT TURDS!!! BOILED HOT TURDS FOR SELL!!!

    THREE FOR THREE $$$ through PAYPAL!!

    "you just can't sell a turd."
    Whatever jealous! Just sit back and watch the mony roll on in!....

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$
    Last edited by AVmetro; August 27th, 2002 at 04:14 AM.

  6. #21
    Rookie JohnV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Dee Dee's first post

    Good, but it focuses on the destruction of the temple. Outside of the opening dismissal of Daniel, it doesn't even mention the Great Tribulation.

  7. #22
    cirisme
    Guest
    Her first post is good, but I don't think it does anything for her. I seriously doubt anyone is going to challenge the fact that the temple was destroyed.

  8. #23
    Resident Atheist Zakath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    3,015
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    249
    Originally posted by Knight
    ...[/i] "you just can't sell a turd."
    Obviously this man has never purchased manure for use in a garden...

  9. #24
    Yxboom
    Guest
    Maybe he has a rock garden.

  10. #25
    Yxboom
    Guest
    Originally posted by cirisme
    Her first post is good, but I don't think it does anything for her. I seriously doubt anyone is going to challenge the fact that the temple was destroyed.
    The opening with the destruction of the temple was powerful in my opinion as what it does is as you observed builds a common ground since a futurist will agree. By building this common ground she doesn't just come out and puke on the audience for it brings validity to the rest of her arguments. Jerry isn't gonna open his thread denouncing that the temple was not in fact destroyed he would lose his argument from the get go. So it follows that she is laying a well place trap I mean argument for her opponent where Jerry is bound to acknowledge her view has validity at least in the launching pad.

    I also think that the silence concerning the tribulation was beneficial for her case as well. I don't know if it was because of length or she meant to do it but it agains helps bolster her foundation because she isn't just coming out sounding like a blithering idiot to any futurist. I would not be surprised if she had all this laid out already. But then Jerry is formidable enough to handle a loaded debate

  11. #26
    Over 500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    221
    I think the easy rejoinder to Dee Dee's first post is John 2:21-22
    21 But the temple he had spoken of was his body.
    22 After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had said. Then they believed the Scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.

    Since Jerry would never agree with anything I say, I have no problem posting this, hehe.
    For Greek conversion, click here.
    <opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of TOL or the TOL Holding Company, and are in fact probably either wrong or dangerous or something even worse. In the event of a world-wide catastrophe coming from one of these posts, all we can say is we did not do it and we warned you not to listen to this post, but NOOOOO, you knew what you were doing all along and yet you STILL managed to destroy part of a continent and yet missed Hollywood! Any resemblance to mathematicians dead or alive is strictly on purpose.>

  12. #27
    Dee Dee Warren
    Guest
    Dear Everyone:

    I am not sure if I am allowed to post here at all now... but I am sure that I am not allowed to post anything substantive... so I won't. But I am utterly astounded (did that sound melodramatic enough) at the failure of almost everyone to grasp my point. I don't mind having my points criticized (Lord knows I get that all the time) but I would certainly like for them to be grasped first. I am asking you kindly to please reread what I posted... there is a logical progression to the argument which is summarized in the final paragraph. No one here has shown that they understand the dilemna that I presented. Now I understand that all of you may disagree that it is an actual dilemna, and go for it if that is what you believe, but please for Pete's sake.... and least try to "get" what I am saying. .. I apologize for any writing inability or ill communication on my part.

    And to our dear and beloved moderators please promptly delete this post if I am not supposed to be posting here.

  13. #28
    Rookie JohnV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Dee Dee

    OK, I've re-read your last paragraph. I think I understand it, and I think it's incorrect. I'm not going to go into my reasoning in any depth during the Battle, but here's a clue: Olivet Discourse. You like that term, but think about it a little bit.

  14. #29
    Dee Dee Warren
    Guest
    Dear JohnV:

    All I am asking is that you understand the point... disagreement is fine.. but I think we all want to make sure that what we are disagreeing with is actually the point that the other person was making and not a phantom, so I thank you heartily for taking the time to make sure that we understand each other. That is all that I can ask, so thank you.

    And I am sure that Jerry disagrees too, so perhaps he will pose the issues that you would do if it were a debate between you and I. If not, you and I can hash it out afterwards.... I would look forward to it.

  15. #30
    Dee Dee Warren
    Guest
    I think the easy rejoinder to Dee Dee's first post is John 2:21-22
    Jaltus, Jaltus, I already spanked you on that before... do you need another

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us