Advice for Kim in Kentucky

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
The time of civil disobedience is behind us, UNLESS EVERYONE awakes from their apathetic nap and demonstrates as one...
Let's bring her a cake with a file in it (Ac 5:19). :reals: Jack Phillips at Masterpiece Cakeshop will help us. :jump:

chef.gif
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
the real story is not getting out
most are arguing around the edges
here is my understanding
her name is on the license
and
until it is removed
she will not allow it to be issued to anyone
if
she resigns
the license can be issued with her name on it
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Back to the OP, is it really a good idea for the state to be in charge of marriages. Remember the Othello game? If one black faced chip is at the end and you have a black chip, but all the chips between are white, you get to flip them all when you put yours down.

As the evangelical pastors of 1800s warned, the church should be the institution authorizing marriage. Sex and cohabing outside of marriage are agnostic and atheistic views of it anyway. And they don't need a state office to manage them, unless there is divorce but that seems to get managed no matter what.

But marriage is an act with God. It is a trinity. It is the belief that there are reasons beyond the visible and animal world (animals have sex and reproduce) that merit joining in God's name as an act of worship. In Catholicism it is a sacrament like communion. The wedding is a statement that there is only one kind of human sexual activity approved by the Creator of sex, and it is hopefully a statement that enough research and preparation about male-female relations has been done to say that a commitment for life can be made between that particular couple, which is also what its Creator wanted.

There is no state office that can cover this and I wouldn't want one anyway. The first thing to do after the Jun 30 SCOTUS decision was to petition local counties so that the county had NO authority re marriage, meanwhile carrying on in private with weddings and ceremonies at our churches on a need-to-know basis so that no interference is stirred up.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
the real story is not getting out
most are arguing around the edges
here is my understanding
her name is on the license
and
until it is removed
she will not allow it to be issued to anyone
if
she resigns
the license can be issued with her name on it

are you okay with your name on the license for a same sex marriage?
 

1Mind1Spirit

Literal lunatic
She's right, you never will see the day where women and the like are denied the vote. You're dumber than a box of rocks if you think you ever will. You'll have to content yourself with fantasizing about the 1800s...

Nice knee jerk reaction without reading the rest of the thread.

:flamer:
 

Christian Liberty

Well-known member
Bingo... she is giving Jesus a black eye.

We can affect change in this country through our behavior and our vote.... civil disobedience should not be in our repertoire.

You statists are terrible exegetes and terrible people...

Read the Old Testament, like any passage, lol....
 
Top