User Tag List

Page 1 of 7 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 105

Thread: Battle Royale Rules

  1. #1
    Your powers are weak, old man. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,486
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 1,082 Times in 590 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    928293

    Post Battle Royale Rules

    BATTLE ROYALE RULES

    Battle Royale OFFICIAL rules:
    After contestants for a Battle Royale have been chosen each contestant will submit to me via their Battle Royale thread (which will be created by me for them) three possible debate topics and their summarized stance on each proposed debate issue.

    I will then choose ONE of the topics that I feel would be the most interesting and open a new thread and begin the debate. On the debate thread only the combatants and I will be allowed to make posts. I (as moderator) will only make posts for moderation purposes i.e. keeping the debate on track etc. I will not actually participate in the debate. The debate will last a predetermined amount of posts and then I will close the thread.

    The details:
    Once a topic has been chosen (by the ringmaster or moderator) The moderator will choose one of the combatants to post his opening argument (all posts must follow existing TOL guidelines regarding length, language etc.). Then the next combatant will make his opening argument via a post. After that each combatant will take turns responding to each others posts until all rounds in the battle are complete. The length of the battle (maximum amount of posts will be determined by the ringmaster or moderator - see rule addition #2). The maximum amount of posts (rounds) in a battle will include each combatants opening and concluding argument posts. NO combatant will be allowed to post TWO posts in a row, it's POINT vs. COUNTER POINT - (basically post and then wait for a response and then respond etc.) Therefore the combatant who is chosen to post first will get the benefit of making his argument first, but the combatant who posts second will get the benefit of having the last word.(The total number of posts may be higher based on moderator posts which of course will not be included in the round or post count). The only exception will be if posts are disqualified due to editing (more on that below) or the post is deleted because it was past the post deadline. Therefore a combatant may have less than the maximum amount of posts in the debate if these situations occur.

    BATTLE TALK
    For each Battle Royale I will also open up another thread so everyone else can discuss the debate in progress. There will also be a poll for you to vote on who you think is winning the debate (you may want to reserve your vote until the debate has evolved somewhat as you will only get one vote).

    TIME LIMIT
    Each combatant has 48 hours to make his response, after the last response has been made or directly after the moderator has issued the "Let's get in on" command to start the battle.

    EXAMPLE: So, let's say a combatant makes a post and his post is clocked in at: "07-06-2002 05:00 PM" the other combatant has 48 hours from that time to post his follow-up or response, after that post has been made the other combatant has 48 hours from the time of the last response and so on. YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE 48 hours to make a response, you might only take three minutes! But you cannot take MORE than 48 hours.

    If, a combatant takes more than 48 hours to make his response his turn will be skipped - and his post will be deleted if he tries to sneak the post in after the time limit has expired.

    The moderator will let the combatants know if a time limit has been exceeded and the other combatant will then have 48 hours to make a new point or post. And therefore that combatant will have the luxury of having two posts in a row, which is normally illegal!

    EXCEPTIONS
    If, for a some reason you know you cannot make the time limit for whatever reason you can ask the moderator if he/she will extend the deadline for another 48 hours. If you have a compelling reason for the 48 hour deadline to be extended the moderator will inform the combatants of the extended time limit. If the extended time limit is exceeded the combatants turn will be skipped.

    If the moderator does not feel your reason for extending the time limit is compelling enough he/she will inform you and you either will have to rush your response or skip your turn. Too bad!

    AD HOMINEM ATTACKS
    Ad hominem attacks will most certainly be permitted as long as no forums rules are broken i.e.; foul language, blatant blasphemy etc.

    (I would hope my combatant would try such a tactic as it might easily back fire!)

    NO POSTS CAN BE EDITED
    Once a response has been made each combatant will have exactly 2 minutes to make any edits to their post. After that the "last edited by...." message will be posted on the post and the moderator will delete the post and the combatants turn will be forfeited. IS THIS RULE CLEAR? This rule will be strictly enforced and will have ZERO exceptions!

    Basically make sure you are ready to post your response when you post it because we do not want combatants editing their posts after they have been posted.

    QUOTING YOUR OPPONENT
    Please do not quote your opponents entire post in each of your responses. If you wish to quote parts of his posts in your response that is fine and even encouraged.

    SUMMARIZE YOUR QUESTIONS AT THE BOTTOM OF YOUR RESPONSE
    In a post many questions get posed, some serious, some rhetorical. If you have a question you want you opponent to answer make sure to ask in it in a plain and clear way at the bottom of your response i.e,: "Here are my questions for you... 1. bla bla bla? 2. bla bla bla etc.

    RULE ABOUT RULES
    Battle Royale is young and new therefore the rules may change. I will do my best to make everyone aware of the rule changes and or additions.

    -------------------
    RULE ADDITION #1
    How will the moderator determine which combatant to go first? The moderator of the battle will literally flip a coin! Trust me this is as fun for the moderators as it is you, so I give you my word that the moderators will select the order of the debate based on a REAL flip of the coin.

    RULE ADDITION #2
    Length of the Battle. Not all Battles will be 20 rounds (20 posts from each combatant). The moderator will determine the length of the Battle AFTER the topic has been selected. That way if a topic is selected that is on the lighter side it can be given a shorter round limit or if a very HEAVY topic is selected the moderator can select a longer battle.

    RULE ADDITION #3
    The official name of these events shall be "Battle Royale" and not Battle Royal as was first stated. (my bad!)

    RULE ADDITION #4
    Quoting other sources. If you choose to quote another author or source you must recognize that source clearly in your post. If you use a external source and fail to recognize such source you will be subject to verbal abuse .

    Furthermore.... let's keep in mind that the "BATTLE ROYALE" is a debate between participants at TheologyOnLine, NOT a debate between external authors, or theologians so let's attempt to use external sources sparingly. The obvious exception might be The Bible (Gods true word), due to the fact that many theology debates will be centered around the Bible in the first place.

    RULE ADDITION #5
    Minimum and maximum battle length. Battle Royales can range from 5 rounds (minimum) to 30 rounds (maximum).

    RULE ADDITION #6
    All rules already in existence for TheologyOnLine also apply to the Battles. Please refer to the TOL Commandments if you have questions.

    RULE ADDITION #7
    Do not attempt to make your entire argument in your FIRST post! Please keep the post length to no longer than 6 short to medium sized paragraphs. These debates should be POINT vs. COUNTER POINT style... in other words make a point and then let the other combatant respond and make his point, don't restate your original argument over and over for the length of the battle. A good example of post lengths can be found in Battle Royale II both Knight AND Zakath did good job of keeping their posts to reasonable lengths.

    RULE ADDITION #8 - the copyrights!
    By agreeing to participate in a Battle Royale you also agree to allow your Battle to be reprinted or reused in full or in part by TheologyOnLine and it's various entities. In short... Battle Royales belong to TheologyOnLine and can be reprinted only with prior approval from TheologyOnLine.

    RULE ADDITION #9
    Any participant may attach images to their posts if they choose. However, since only subscribers can attach images to posts it is therefore beneficial to be a TOL subscriber. A regular registered TOL member does not have the ability to post image attachments to their posts and can therefore be at a possible disadvantage. To this we say............ SUBSCRIBE!!!

    Please use this thread to ask questions about Battle Royale Rules. Thank you.
    Last edited by Knight; November 3rd, 2005 at 07:27 PM.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Download the new TOL app for iPhone, iPad, and Android...


  2. #2
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Is there anyone to decide the winner? Or is that left to each individual viewer? Also, what sort of topics would you accept?

  3. #3
    Rookie Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Latrobe, PA
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Knight, I think this is a cool idea, and I look forward to the debate(s). I did have one question though I'd like to ask. I know that you choose the topic, but do both participants have to give their ok for a topic? For an example, let's say that a topic suggested, and chosen by you, is whether Jesus was 1) fully man and fully God, or 2) something other than this. And let's say that one of the debate participants has no clue about this subject and has never even thought about it. Would that person then have to debate the subject? It seems like the most entertaining (and certainly productive) debates would be ones on a subject that both participants know something about. Just curious

  4. #4
    Journeyman me again's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    In front of my computer terminal.
    Posts
    170
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    191

    Talking Too hot to handle ?

    Well, I posted three suggestions. And suggestion #1 is what started Freak & I arguing. So that topic is probably a hot potato.
    Favorite scripture:
    • And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever. (Rev. 11:15)
    TheologyReview.com

  5. #5
    Over 3000 post club Freak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    3,003
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    220
    Good Idea Knight-"The Battle Talk" thread is an excellent one! I hope many particpate as we battle...
    Jesus Loves You

  6. #6
    Your powers are weak, old man. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,486
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 1,082 Times in 590 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    928293
    Originally posted by Vann
    Is there anyone to decide the winner? Or is that left to each individual viewer? Also, what sort of topics would you accept?
    The winner is in the eye of the beholder. Although we will have a poll in the post debate "Battle Talk" thread. However, my guess is the poll will represent a very unscientific opinion of the winner.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Download the new TOL app for iPhone, iPad, and Android...


  7. #7
    Your powers are weak, old man. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,486
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 1,082 Times in 590 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    928293
    Justin, both combatants will have to agree upon the topic.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Download the new TOL app for iPhone, iPad, and Android...


  8. #8
    Your powers are weak, old man. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,486
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 1,082 Times in 590 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    928293

    Exclamation RULE ADDITION #1

    How will the moderator select which combatant to go first? I will literally flip a coin. Trust me this is as fun for me as it is you, so I give you my word that I will select the order of the debate based on a REAL flip of the coin.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Download the new TOL app for iPhone, iPad, and Android...


  9. #9
    Over 3000 post club Freak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    3,003
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    220

    Talking Do we get to pick heads or tails?

    Jesus Loves You

  10. #10
    Journeyman me again's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    In front of my computer terminal.
    Posts
    170
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    191

    Talking

    The book of Deuteronomy says that God will make us the head and not the tail. So I pick the head.
    Favorite scripture:
    • And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever. (Rev. 11:15)
    TheologyReview.com

  11. #11
    Your powers are weak, old man. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,486
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 1,082 Times in 590 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    928293
    I will pick "heads" equals Freak - "tails" equals me again or vice versa. So no, you will not get to pick.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Download the new TOL app for iPhone, iPad, and Android...


  12. #12
    Over 3000 post club Freak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    3,003
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    220
    That's fair..
    Jesus Loves You

  13. #13
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Perhaps a better way to pick who goes first is to formulate the resolution of the debate, and then, a la traditional debate, the affirmative goes first and the negative closes. So if the argument is, say, "Evolution provides a sound theoretical basis for scientific discovery" or some such, the person arguing for that would go first. Or, likewise, if the argument were, "ID theory succeeds where other theories have failed in the past" then someone who argues that ID theory does that would go first. This would, perhaps, prevent certain people from complaining that Knight rigged the coin toss in favor of one person or another.

    Then again, both parties have to agree on the formulation of the topic, so one person could request a topic that gives them whatever position they choose. Hmm, I just think Knight's "coin toss" will eventually lead to more arguments than something a little more formal. Any other ideas?

  14. #14
    Pilgrimagain
    Guest
    Van that is a great idea

  15. #15
    Rookie Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Latrobe, PA
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    I assume that if someone is going to quote the work of someone else, that they will have to recognize the author of the work, right? I guess that's obvious, but I just want it to be stated in public view since more than a couple times in the history of TOL people have tried to pass off other people's work as their own.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us