User Tag List

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 95

Thread: Battle Royale XI suggestions

  1. #76
    Over 500 post club sentientsynth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Where the soil is black and red
    Posts
    534
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by K$
    You don't think anyone else on here is capable of defending disp?

    I'm sure many of you have copies of The Plot, just post those!
    I had a man with a slightly different dispensational perspective in mind, K$, from a man who I believe isn't familiar with TOL. It's a long shot, but I've made stone cold phone calls before. It all depends on who's going to be representing the Covenant side.




    SS

  2. #77
    Over 1000 post club logos_x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Anderson, Indiana, USA
    Posts
    1,052
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Redfin
    I like the universal salvation topic.

    It would likely have to be Logos-X to defend it, although there may be some others who would be competent.
    Who would like to present eternal torment if this were pursued? No one seemed interested.

  3. #78
    TOL Legend kmoney's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    A farm
    Posts
    10,550
    Thanks
    1,225
    Thanked 2,609 Times in 1,393 Posts

    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    1246786
    Quote Originally Posted by Sozo
    Never.

    I only question the bizarre idea that foreknowledge would equal causation.
    oh ok, I mixed it up.

  4. #79
    BANNED Apologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    174
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by logos_x
    Who would like to present eternal torment if this were pursued? No one seemed interested.
    Me. I am very, very eager to show why, when you die, you are going to be thrown into the fiery pits of hell, ravished by demons, and skewered over a burning lake.

  5. #80
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,674
    Thanks
    654
    Thanked 6,938 Times in 3,695 Posts

    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147775
    Quote Originally Posted by Sozo
    Never.

    I only question the bizarre idea that foreknowledge would equal causation.
    Bizzarre in that no one holds to this silly idea.

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  6. #81
    Over 1000 post club logos_x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Anderson, Indiana, USA
    Posts
    1,052
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Apologist
    Me. I am very, very eager to show why, when you die, you are going to be thrown into the fiery pits of hell, ravished by demons, and skewered over a burning lake.
    Go to hell.

  7. #82
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,674
    Thanks
    654
    Thanked 6,938 Times in 3,695 Posts

    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147775
    Quote Originally Posted by sentientsynth
    Who do we have in mind to represent the Covenantal side?


    SS
    Good question! I have no idea who would be qualified. Most people don't even understand what Covenant Theology is! In fact, the only person I've ever heard give a cogent definition of the term was a dispensationalist.

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  8. #83
    BANNED Apologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    174
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by logos_x
    Go to hell.
    to the hell you don't believe in? Not only are you a heretic, but a hypocrite as well!

  9. #84
    Journeyman No Worries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    167
    "Seperation of Church and State - to be or not to be?"

    OR

    "WAR: UnChristian or Crusade?"

  10. #85
    Over 1000 post club logos_x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Anderson, Indiana, USA
    Posts
    1,052
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    I believe in hell...you don't even know what you want to refute!

  11. #86
    BANNED Apologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    174
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by logos_x
    I believe in hell...you don't even know what you want to refute!
    But your understanding of it is extremely flawed. The debate, from what i understand, would be this:

    I, Apologist, would present an argument clearly showing that it is possible to be "unsaved" and that the "unsaved" shall burn forever in fiery torment.

    You, Logos, shall attempt to refute my arguments while, at the same time, showing that all souls are eventually saved.

    I, apologist, will show why your refutations are bull, and why your argument is fallacious.

    And so forth and so on.

    If you will have said debate OKed by the moderation, and set a date, i shall begin researching the topic and formulating my argument.

  12. #87
    Over 1000 post club logos_x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Anderson, Indiana, USA
    Posts
    1,052
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Apologist
    But your understanding of it is extremely flawed. The debate, from what i understand, would be this:

    I, Apologist, would present an argument clearly showing that it is possible to be "unsaved" and that the "unsaved" shall burn forever in fiery torment.

    You, Logos, shall attempt to refute my arguments while, at the same time, showing that all souls are eventually saved.

    I, apologist, will show why your refutations are bull, and why your argument is fallacious.

    And so forth and so on.

    If you will have said debate OKed by the moderation, and set a date, i shall begin researching the topic and formulating my argument.
    Pretty sure of yourself aren't you?

  13. #88
    BANNED Apologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    174
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by logos_x
    Pretty sure of yourself aren't you?

    do you accept my challenge or not? If so, then i formally challenge you with the permission of the moderation.

  14. #89
    Over 1000 post club logos_x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Anderson, Indiana, USA
    Posts
    1,052
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Yes. I accept your challenge. If the moderation approves.

  15. #90
    Journeyman 2ephesians8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    95
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    175
    'I can't imagine kids not being taught about sex in school. It's so common; we know it works. What sometimes doesn't work are the occasional weirdo parents who either refuse to talk to their kids at all or else teach them some ridiculous unnatural BS.

    Imagine bisexual or homosexual parents teaching their teenage son that he should "explore" freely and openly. Or an ultra-conservative home where kids are taught masturbation will send you straight to Hell. It seems to me that we need scholastic sex ed to counter any such harms."


    Quote taken from the x-rated childrens book thread. Maybe not B. Royal material, but definately fightin' words. The 'we know it works' part especially. Just a thought....
    Today's fortune cookie say: " The mighty oak was once a little nut that stood its ground."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us