oatmeal
Well-known member
Galatians 1:1-2:21
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.
24 And they glorified God in me.
But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles
9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
Did Peter and Paul have two different sets of truths?
Was there two different sons of God that died for their sins?
Were there two different Gods?
Or was the approach different?
Judeans would be familiar with the law of Moses
Gentiles would not be
Would there be one set of truths for Judeans and an entirely different set of truths, maybe even contradictory, for the Gentiles?
God forbid.
It was the differing backgrounds of those two groups of people that required two different approaches
Do you teach scripture to a five year old the same way you teach scripture on this website to a sixty year old who has been reading scripture for decades?
For that matter, would you teach the same truths? Some overlap would be there, but there are truths that the five year old would not yet be able to comprehend.
Is there a different lord Jesus for women than there are for men?
Or for wives vs. husbands?
There are places and times and truths that have to have a hard line to it, but were there two different gospels?
No, not at all.
There is but one gospel for this age of grace
kweshtuns? commints? snipe rimarks?
or for those who can spell English words:
Questions? Comments? Snide remarks?
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.
24 And they glorified God in me.
But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles
9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
Did Peter and Paul have two different sets of truths?
Was there two different sons of God that died for their sins?
Were there two different Gods?
Or was the approach different?
Judeans would be familiar with the law of Moses
Gentiles would not be
Would there be one set of truths for Judeans and an entirely different set of truths, maybe even contradictory, for the Gentiles?
God forbid.
It was the differing backgrounds of those two groups of people that required two different approaches
Do you teach scripture to a five year old the same way you teach scripture on this website to a sixty year old who has been reading scripture for decades?
For that matter, would you teach the same truths? Some overlap would be there, but there are truths that the five year old would not yet be able to comprehend.
Is there a different lord Jesus for women than there are for men?
Or for wives vs. husbands?
There are places and times and truths that have to have a hard line to it, but were there two different gospels?
No, not at all.
There is but one gospel for this age of grace
kweshtuns? commints? snipe rimarks?
or for those who can spell English words:
Questions? Comments? Snide remarks?
