What claims am I making that you can refute? If you make a good argument, I will not dismiss it.
"New American research shows that there could be a link between the controversial MMR triple vaccine and autism and bowel disease in children"
Specifically refuted by the lead author of that very research that allegedly shows such a link.
"Here is a list of 28 studies that support Wakefield's findings"
I already cited one which does not in that list of 28, and that was the very first one I looked at... this gives me great doubt that the others are any better. I don't have the time or patience to examine all of them, though 1 is sufficient to refute the claim.
Freedom to practice my religion. I live in the United States.
And how do vaccine requirements for children infringe upon your freedom of religion?
If vaccines are not mandated for the entire population, why mandate them for school children?
Because children are not capable of making an informed decision on the matter at such a young age. If adults wish to put themselves in harms way they are free to do so in most respects, they however cannot put children in harms way.
It is for the pro-vaxxers who want to trivialize the injuries and deaths following vaccination as acceptable risk to obtain their goals.
Are you referring to something outside of allergic reactions? Because children which have allergies to the ingredients are not permitted to receive them. Those that knowingly and put children in harms way should be held accountable.
You had no point, other than to try and associate me with an ideology I don't believe in.
The rationale between anti-vaxxers refusing vaccines for their children and Christian Scientists who refuse medical treatment for their children is the same: Infringement upon personal beliefs and parental sovereignty over the welfare of their children.
lain: