Nazaroo
New member
Now lets turn to the issues that are apparently important to you:
(perhaps these will be better thought out and researched?)
What I do find is that your choice of topic is trivial and infantile.
There is nothing difficult about following English etiquette in regard
to social norms, and why would you refuse to, and let that get in the
way of anything important you have to say?
Most people just "man up" after the age of say 25, and behave themselves
when speaking publicly. At least that used to be the norm,
until this latest generation has been dumbed down to the point where
they can't speak without using an irrelevant and ineffective "cuss word"
in every sentence.
I couldn't care less whether you use "cuss words".
But please don't use words at all without a purpose.
Perhaps below we can find more substantive issues to discuss.
logical fallacy.
Of course there are more heterosexual pedophiles.
Heterosexuals represent 95% of the population.
All things being equal, 95% of pedophiles should be heterosexuals.
However two things mitigate against this:
(1) Sexual deviates already defy categorization because they can cross boundaries which would be barriers to those who are stable and classifiable.
(2) People mis-categorize sexual offenders as if they were or could be
grouped with normal categories like "heterosexual", when this is a
scientifically fallacious method of categorization.
Really? This is so retarded that I can scarcely believe you are serious.
Its akin to "Just say no to rapists." Do you really think parents
are the main group to blame for what is plainly a well-financed
and organized agenda to destroy Christian society and culture?
Here's a better newsflash:
Children and teens can EASILY be corrupted into becoming involved and
committed to all kinds of dangerous and stupid activities.
Your cute 'rules of thumb' are the real fantasy here.
Drug abuse is an obvious example of this vulnerability,
and the need for children and teens to be protected from exploiters
of all kinds.
The idea that sexual experimentation, like drug experimentation,
could be harmless is total insanity personified.
No comment, except lets I.D. the fantasy correctly this time.
very many of the "lies you were taught".
Keep studying.
(perhaps these will be better thought out and researched?)
I don't know about ironic, because that would require substance.
What I do find is that your choice of topic is trivial and infantile.
There is nothing difficult about following English etiquette in regard
to social norms, and why would you refuse to, and let that get in the
way of anything important you have to say?
Most people just "man up" after the age of say 25, and behave themselves
when speaking publicly. At least that used to be the norm,
until this latest generation has been dumbed down to the point where
they can't speak without using an irrelevant and ineffective "cuss word"
in every sentence.
I couldn't care less whether you use "cuss words".
But please don't use words at all without a purpose.
Perhaps below we can find more substantive issues to discuss.
I am really shocked that your own mind hasn't called you on this
logical fallacy.
Of course there are more heterosexual pedophiles.
Heterosexuals represent 95% of the population.
All things being equal, 95% of pedophiles should be heterosexuals.
However two things mitigate against this:
(1) Sexual deviates already defy categorization because they can cross boundaries which would be barriers to those who are stable and classifiable.
(2) People mis-categorize sexual offenders as if they were or could be
grouped with normal categories like "heterosexual", when this is a
scientifically fallacious method of categorization.
Really? This is so retarded that I can scarcely believe you are serious.
Its akin to "Just say no to rapists." Do you really think parents
are the main group to blame for what is plainly a well-financed
and organized agenda to destroy Christian society and culture?
Here's a better newsflash:
Children and teens can EASILY be corrupted into becoming involved and
committed to all kinds of dangerous and stupid activities.
Your cute 'rules of thumb' are the real fantasy here.
Drug abuse is an obvious example of this vulnerability,
and the need for children and teens to be protected from exploiters
of all kinds.
The idea that sexual experimentation, like drug experimentation,
could be harmless is total insanity personified.
Why let reality get in the way of a perfectly good fantasy, right?
No comment, except lets I.D. the fantasy correctly this time.
What is sad, but predictable, is that you still haven't shaken off
very many of the "lies you were taught".
Keep studying.
