Noted.
James White to Debate Bob Enyart on Open Theism
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
glorydaz
Well-known member
Sticks and stones.....call me anything your little mind can conjure up. I would suggest Rikki Tikki Tavi. He takes care of all the evil snakes. :thumb:
Note: The "refined one" had a dirty mind and read into what wasn't there, as you did. The "refined one" isn't as "refined" as you might think, now, is she? "Refined"....... :rotfl:
I was asking you about your language.
Did I have it correct? Immutable applies in a limited way to certain things about God like His loving kindness and faithfulness, but does not mean He cannot change in terms of the incarnation -- for example.
That's a yes-or-no question. If your links answered that question, could you not just say so?
I've been called a heretic and uneducated. James White reckons I'm not even a Christian. :idunno:
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
I agree with James. None of you guys are Christians.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Ha!
I have come up with a few of my own, but have resisted lowering myself to her vulgar level.
I just wonder if readers of this thread have taken note of the disruption of a fairly interesting discussion that was occurring before the pointless interruptions and name-calling that these female sycophants began this evening?
Is this the best defense Open Theists can conjure up in a debate?
glorydaz
Well-known member
Ah yes, the wisdom of the natural man. He thinks so highly of himself and considers the spiritual man a fool. Nothing new there. :nono:
you really are stupid aren't you? Why not research blowback? Or are you too scared to think your government could ever lie to you/
I'm too manly to blindly follow orders. I'm too manly to become a pawn to kill and die for politicians. And I'd be manly enough to say that to a soldier's face if I needed to.
FYI, little boy. Anyone who has to talk about how "manly" he is ISN'T. At least put on your big boy pants before coming to post on an adult forum. :duh:
We know that is not correct, because God did change without ever ceasing to be God.
Well I'll be.
And here I heard Jesus was made a little lower than the angels, and yet never ceased to be God.
Maybe you didn't get the memo.
Another memo you must have missed:
Romans 1 KJV
(20) For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
(20) For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
"Finite" level????
He became one of us (mankind) and walked among us. Yet he never ceased being God.
Since God is the only infinite one, you don't get to set that rule for Him to abide by. God can change, and God did change, and yet he never ceased being God.
He defined Himself as becoming a man and a little lower than the angels. And yet He never ceased being God.
God can and did change, and yet never ceased being God.
We know that from scripture.
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
I don't think highly of myself. If God didn't regenerate my mind I'd be just as dumb and lost as Enyart.
Its you guys who think highly of yourselves, since you think you chose to accept Christ.
I don't have to, I was just showing the absurdity of your original comment.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Yep, there ya be, Nang, in all your "sycophant" glory. :thumb:
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
Has anybody told you you were stupid, Glorydaz?
Go on back and read my posts, and then list what names I have called you.
And then I will list the names you have called me.
Fair enough?
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
Or you could, you know, actually debate. If you had anything to debate, which you don't.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Of course, and I've been called an idiot before, too. I always consider the source, however, and so am able to overlook it from people I have no respect for.
Again, tell us, just when did it become a criteria that in order for one to be right, they had to first be the smartest of the two?
I'll wait.
glorydaz
Well-known member
I know...
Brother Vinny
Active member
This is a danger I see in Calvinism (although I am in danger of painting with too broad a brush) -- they put so much stock in doctrinal correctness that it becomes a mark of a right relationship with God. The implication is the better (and more-rightly) educated a person is, the closer that person's walk must be.
glorydaz
Well-known member
To be honest, AMR. That is about the worst post I have ever seen you write. It's rambling, and doesn't make a lick of sense. Nor does it address the verses I gave you.
No, I do not feel like I'm being coerced into praying. I feel like I am speaking to my Father, and He is hearing every word I speak and knows every fear I can't even express. I know, without a doubt, that God will RESPOND and work together for good every circumstance that I face. He rewards me for coming to Him by filling me with His peace and answers every request that is for my best.
I don't believe God was lying when said, "You have not because you ask not. Whatsoever you ask in my Name.... You seem to think that we have a Father that sits on His throne with His fingers firmly in His ears and watches our mouths run. I don't believe it.
Hello CL,
I enjoyed interacting with a Reformed PhD at http://OpenTheism.org in the debate titled, Is Calvinism Biblical? If I recall, my opening post introduced the excellent passages that you're referencing CL. Then the debate proceeded mostly covering the Scripture in Romans 9. As I recall, afterward, the Calvinists said that their side won hands down.
-Bob Enyart
Posted from the TOL App!
glorydaz
Well-known member
For the record. This is hardly a "hit me with your best shot" permission, Vinny, as you've claimed in chat. You should be able to tell by my suggestion I didn't expect an adult male would even think of sending me the private message you did. If your conscience doesn't allow you to post something on the open forum, you should really try to refrain altogether.
Of course, I was surprised Nang took the low road, too, so go figure. "Equally appalling" tells me you two make a great team. Great minds think alike.